Stay updated with breaking news from Deregulate. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
this state, and i think that he did that based upon a more of a libertarian streak, no masks, getting the government out of people's lives, and let people just live. let corporations, you know, untether them from regulations, deregulate. i think that's a success story here in florida. i think he would be best served by telling that story, and not necessarily getting, you know, continuing it quadruple down, as you said, with the disney fight. i think there's a path for him, yeah. >> once i got past quint, i started to lose my ability to think on the fly there. ashley, let me ask you, though, are democrats at this point, i know the stereo typical, they would be more afraid of desantis because he isn't trump and he's young, and that's a contrast. is that the case? are democrats more afraid of a desantis nominee than a trump nominee? >> i think democrats should be prepared for any nominee. they're all different candidates. even though they have similar policies, tim scott, nikki
voted on because they're interested in deregulating these sort of events, making it more dangerous. so that's one. number two, yeah, we shouldn't sit here and blame elaine chao for not going to, you know, every one of the train derailments that happened during the trump administration. no democrat called for it. of course, republicans and their stooges on trump media are calling for it just because, again, they're a party of gestures. they just want to blame people. they want to deregulate. they want to make accidents like this more likely to happen, and then they want to go in and gesture and do absolutely nothing about it. keeping the people of east palestine and across the rest of the country in more perilous position. >> there were train tragedies during the trump years, just as there were during the obama years and the bush years and the
the levelling up agenda? _ financial sector. you concern about the levelling up agenda? this - financial sector. you concern about| the levelling up agenda? this there is s - in the levelling up agenda? this there is spin today _ the levelling up agenda? this there is spin today that _ the levelling up agenda? this there is spin today that deregulation - the levelling up agenda? this there is spin today that deregulation willl is spin today that deregulation will free up the city of london. what is going to happen is, they are going to take our money on the money manage first, they will speculate on more risky activities. if it goes wrong the city will have banked it bonuses. i think what will happen in terms of levelling up is that the city will generate more profits, higher returns from more deprived areas of the uk. that is going to exacerbate inequality, rather than promote levelling up.— exacerbate inequality, rather than promote levelling up. when jeremy hunt sa 5 promote levelling up. when jeremy hunt says these _ promote levelling up. when jeremy hunt says these reforms _ promote levelling up. when jeremy hunt says these reforms are - promote levelling up. when jeremy hunt says these reforms are going l promote levelling up. when jeremy i hunt says these reforms are going to turbo—charge growth and that regulation and financial services remain robust despite that relaxation, you basically don�*t believe them? yet but i certainly don�*t agree with that. the
2008? b. financial crash of the kind resort 2008? �* ., ., ., , financial crash of the kind resort 2008? ., ., ., 2008? a lot of veterans of the s stem 2008? a lot of veterans of the system are _ 2008? a lot of veterans of the system are concerned - 2008? a lot of veterans of the system are concerned it - 2008? a lot of veterans of the system are concerned it is - 2008? a lot of veterans of the system are concerned it is a i system are concerned it is a slippery slope to further deregulation. the banks are stronger than they were, but they are far from strong enough to withstand another major financial shock. secondly conjuring trick makes the sector look stronger than it is. the uk remains very exposed to risks in the global financial system, simply because our financial markets are such a big part of our economy. if things go wrong in the global financial system we are more exposed than our economic rivals. people are afraid that a combination of these measures are leading to a serious amount of deregulation and reduction in communion protection in the uk financial sector. you in communion protection in the uk financial sector.— in communion protection in the uk financial sector. you concern about the levelling _ financial sector. you concern about the levelling up — financial sector. you concern about
been sold as the second version, but i would remember the 2008 financial crisis. the government and the city of london are selling deregulation as a way of promoting economic growth. the 2008 financial crisis cost this country £1.8 trillion in lost economic output. 0ur financial system is not yet strong enough since the financial crisis to take yet another gamble with deregulation and reductions in consumer protection. if it goes wrong, the city of london will walk away with its profits and bonuses, but ordinary taxpayers and households will end up paying the price for another failed will end up paying the price for anotherfailed regulatory will end up paying the price for another failed regulatory gamble. the governance as these are sensible reforms. are you saying there is a serious danger they could lead to another financial crisis, another financial crash of the kind resort
why see the government are bringing them in. is it because the government fear that the city of london is slipping behind after brexit? . . london is slipping behind after brexit? , . ., brexit? there is evidence that the ci of brexit? there is evidence that the city of london _ brexit? there is evidence that the city of london is _ brexit? there is evidence that the city of london is losing _ brexit? there is evidence that the city of london is losing ground. it| city of london is losing ground. it is safe to say the city remains centre in europe, but it is certainly losing ground. what seems to be happening as the government wants deregulate. the theory is not to rely on european business.- the theory is not to rely on european business. some are old enou:h to european business. some are old enough to remember— european business. some are old enough to remember that - european business. some are old - enough to remember that deregulation in the 1980s, is this the second kind of bang bang? you�*ll like this
important, a spear of thought for all the people that have been affected by the stop, stuff. >> absolutely, but of course, it is and what a scheme, and the governor will not be stepping into rescue anyone. the whole point of crypto is to some of the government, deregulate, don't be part of any of it. and so, now, you are out there holding the bag on your own. quickly, give us an update on twitter. things aren't getting better over there, are they? >> no, things are not getting better. you know, remember, they were just starting to charge $8 a month for you to actually be verified, without actually checking whether you'll be verified. today, we've been watching an incredible cascade of effects from that. you are seeing people impersonate companies like eli lilly, by buying a very legit-looking username, and then putting the word, eli lilly above it, and a check mark. and then, announcing, insulin is free. that cratered the stock price of eli lilly, such that it had to apologize, then suddenly, you've got bernie sanders jumping on top of that.
the governor will not be stepping into rescue anyone. the whole point of crypto is to some of the government, deregulate, don't be part of any of it. and so, now, you are out there holding the bag on your own. quickly, give us an update on twitter. things aren't getting better over there, are they? >> no, things are not getting better. you know, remember, they were just starting to charge $8 a month for you to actually be verified, without actually checking whether you'll be verified. today, we've been watching an incredible cascade of effects from that. you are seeing people impersonate companies like eli lilly, by buying a very legit -looking username, and then putting the word, eli lilly above it, and a check mark. and then, announcing, insulin is free. that cratered the stock price of eli lilly, such that it had to apologize, then suddenly, you've got bernie sanders jumping on top of that. just this absolute, it's every major brand basically it's gonna get on twitter. that's why they've stopped the verification process. it's a total nightmare.
crypto itself. but there are plenty of everyday people who went for this. you'll recall that during the super bowl, there was that famous commercial on which larry david, famously sits at her desk and says, no, i'm not gonna get any crypto, having been historically wrong about every other great invention of the past. that ad, along with ads from all sorts of other cryptocurrency, businesses, and all sorts of other celebrities, convinced everyday people to put huge amounts of money into this. you have entire retirement and pension funds, putting themselves into this stuff. so, although it is fine to look at somebody like, say, bankman-fried, the person who is running ftx, and say oh, that billionaire, he was just a ponzi scheme. here's the thing. every day people have lost those billions of dollars, and they are not coming back. and so, while it may not -- >> okay, fine -- >> directly, it is really important, a spear of thought for all the people that have been affected by the stop, stuff. >> absolutely, but of course, it is and what a scheme, and the governor will not be stepping into rescue anyone. the whole point of crypto is to some of the government, deregulate, don't be part of any of it. and so, now, you are out there holding the bag on your own. quickly, give us an update on
tough. there are horrible stories emerging from many of them about the treatment of the people inside them. so just the optics of this, everything is about the optics, more than the reality. at the optics are terrible, the first thing it says is we are pulling out the drawbridge, not letting any suffering people into this country. to me that's a national embarrassment, we should be welcoming people, not turning them away and telling them tough luck. the times says the bill is to tackle the record number of migrants crossing the channel. just turning back to the financial times, "number ten squashes jacob rees—mogg's half—baked work performance." do tell us more about what he wanted to do. ~ tell us more about what he wanted to do. . g . . ., , tell us more about what he wanted to do. , ., do. well, jacob rees-mogg has wanted to deregulate — do. well, jacob rees-mogg has wanted to deregulate business, _ do. well, jacob rees-mogg has wanted to deregulate business, and _ do. well, jacob rees-mogg has wanted to deregulate business, and he's- to deregulate business, and he's come _ to deregulate business, and he's come up —