Stay updated with breaking news from Go out there. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
of your audience that the state department has a bunch of democrats working there. >> you don't know if all these 900 are democrats, these are career foreign service officerses who go out there and serve all over the world, they come back and they're complaining. let me -- you say it's okay to have some dissent. >> absolutely. >> listen to what the white house press secretary, sean spicer, though, said. listen to this. >> i think that they should either get with the program or they can go. if they don't like it, then they shouldn't take the job. >> you agree with him? >> i agree. they can dissent, but if they're not going to do their job, they need to move on. >> they can do their job but they cab disagree -- >> they can always disagree. >> it's okay to disagree -- >> absolutely. >> than to say, you know what, mr. president, we think this policy is wrong. they're going to go ahead and u.s. at the u.s. embassy -- >> correct. >> -- in bangkok or someplace like that. they're not happy about this. >> the president of the united states -- it's not the career bureaucrats that set the policy. it's the president of the united states. we had an election. our side won the election. i think they should have a right to dissent and they should not be fired for expressing their
i may have said i've been stopped by people and this was their gripe running up to the election, a man stopped me in the store, had a stroke, had to deal with obamacare. he was furious. the political decision has been made to replace it. so the republican party and the trump administration i hope should be bold, go out there, and take the credit for it and change it. >> i think there are people who like obamacare. there are problems with it but it is incredible for the republicans at this point to now be in a position to do this and not have a plan. so many times be telling the democrats you don't know what you're doing, we have a better idea and to not have any plan. >> i don't think that's true. we just don't know it. >> that's slightly ridiculous with all due respect. so that's ridiculous because we throughout the whole campaign we heard there'd be a plan. now they've been up on capitol hill trying to take it away with
because you're inspiring us. >> women like you. successful women, beautiful women. i am so inspired every day by my successful colleagues, men and women, who believe in gender equality. i am inspired by a lot of organizations. for example, wmf, who go out there and stick their necks out fighting for women every day and saying, we support you. >> it's an international sisterhood, i'll say that. thank you so much for your time, stella. >> thank you. >> best of luck. >> thank you. >> since we spoke, stella has returned to india. she said she arrived to suspicious interrogations. but she said she loves telling people's story. she says as i write them for the world now, my heart is full of gratitude. we'll be right back.
virtually no fact checking whatsoever. >> matt, back to you. by most accounts, he went on after that, to give a good speech about policy, and what he planned to do, but by starting with this, did he just sort of feed into the -- stepping on his own message, and did he miss a big opportunity here? >> absolutely, he gave that speech, i think there were 16 or 17 days left in the campaign every single news cycle is precious. when you're rolling out a substantive policy proposal at gettysburg. they had all the media hooks or gimmicks, whatever you want to call it, to get the press to pay attention. we do it at gettysburg, hype it as a contract for america. we have newt gingrich go out there and say, pay attention to this, it's one of the best speeches in the history of mankind. you want the press to pay attention to something that's
>> and numerous other lawyers have said it. i've read stories in various newspapers where others are saying the exact same thing. the republicans can't nominate somebody -- i think i'm going to win on my own merits. but if he ever got it, the democrats are going to bring suit the first day. and how do you run when you have a suit like that hanging over your head and almost as important, you're running for office and you have a suit saying you can't run for office. so until the judges make that determination -- now, perhaps he can go and get a declaratory judgment meaning go to court early. but he has to solve that problem. he was born in canada. and in fact and he was canadian citizen. i guess he was a citizen of the u.s. and canada euntil 15 month ago. so he has a problem. and the democrats will bring suit. so how do we have our candidate, we say good luck ted, go out there and get it, by the way the
that "new york times" article the campaign wants her to show more humor, spontaneity, go out there and be herself. when you write an article like that that's awkward. >> when a somebody says you have to be more spontaneous and then okay darling what time? that doesn't work out so well. >> it did end up in the paper. she's been dealing with this for a long time. i have evidence of a 1999 memo to hillary clinton from an adviser that says look for opportunities for humor. it's important more people see more sides of you. this is not new for her. she has struggled with her image. >> hillary clinton does not love campaigning. this garish spotlight that's on her not where she's most comfortable. i've been in the run up to her campaign i was covering her for a year before and some of these speeches she seemed much more
terrorist, they're right there on twitter direct messaging for you to communicate with. people that isil is trying to reach are people al qaeda would never use as an operative. >> why is that? >> because they are often unstable troubled drug users and isil also does something al qaeda will never do vet an operative by tasking them. right? give them an assignment. go kill somebody. as a way of checking out whether they are a real person or an informant of some kind. >> when isis publicly puts out there on social media, if you can't come to iraq and syria and fight with us go out there and kill u.s. military personnel or law enforcement officers you take that seriously? >> very. >> you told us recently that you and your colleagues thwarted a july fourth attack or attacks, right? >> correct. >> what can you tell us about that? >> not much. [ laughter ] what's interesting about the isil model there too is the normal terms of inspired
operative by testing them. >> give them an assignment. go kill somebody. check out whether they are a real person. >> so when isis pushily puts out there on social media, if you can't come over to iraq and syria and fight with us go out there and kill u.s. military personnel or law enforcement officers, you take that seriously? >> very. >> what can you us about that? >> no much. >> the normal terms of inspired enabled blend together. they're pushing like a devil on somebody's shoulder saying kill kill kill all day long so figures out whether they were inspired directed or enabled is a waste of time in many cases. there are a numb number of
about not airbrushing history, but actually looking at history, right? and remembering the way that it really was at that moment. not just a sanitized view that we sometimes get in the media or we sometimes look back on history with. so, it was an exceptional moment. >> mark? >> yeah, no, i couldn't agree more, rev. look, the president loves this country enough to tell the truth about our history. >> right. >> and to tell the truth about our values and to frankly, confront some of the uglier parts of our nation's history. so when people like rudy giuliani go out there and say the president wasn't you know raised the same way he was, i mean, it's a hideous thing for him to say, first of all, but second of all, on some level, it's true. the president had a childhood, had an experience growing up that was different from rudy giuliani's because he's a black american and he faced adversity that rudy giuliani never had to. so i think the president sees where we are as a country, sees the progress we've made.
is the single greatest hit job on the c.i.a. since the publication by philip agee of inside the company in the 1960s and he was work for the cubans. >> was it ineffective as senator feinstein is saying? were these tactics, were they ineffective? >> i disagree completely with the findings with senator feinstein. this allowed the c.i.a. to take out the second tier of al-qaeda because you have to remember, after 9-11, bin laden and fellow herery went underground and the second tier were the individuals attempt to go plan and execute catastrophic attacks and the united states suffered no follow on catastrophic attack because of this program. >> sure. when you look at the report, there is no context. remember back then, we had already lost 3,000 americans. we thought that there was going to be another wave and in fact, there is evidence that they were planning lots more attacks on the united states. we were just trying to do something. the president directed the c.i.a., go out there and stop something from happening and that's what they did.