Stay updated with breaking news from Outline. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
their entire message is competence versus chaos. as we just heard, kind of the outline from john heilemann about the back and forth fight between lauren boebert and marjorie taylor greene, i mean, lauren boebert responded and said, "i'm not in middle school." it's like, are you sure you're not in middle school? that's how middle schoolers act, you know? if you're the american public sitting at home, you're thinking, what a waste of time. what a waste of my time, that they are doing there. that is exactly the contrast that the white house, if you're sitting in the white house right now, my old colleagues there, if you're sitting in the democratic congressional campaign committee and you're working with democratic candidates, you're going to run on, we'll do something. we will fight for you, public. that is chaotic and crazy there, and we will not be that. >> let them fight among themselves. >> contrast. >> we are going to fight for you. let them look to the past. we're going to look to your future.
could work to the democrats advantage, and to joe biden's advantage. you just gave a pretty effective outline of everything going on there. with a little detail, marjorie taylor greene and lauren boebert in serum sort of version of a catfight today about who is going to be putting forward articles of impeachment, or trying to impeach the president. this is ultimately not what the public cares about. it's not what they want congress to do for them, what they want government to do for them. well, yes there are a range of polls out there, i would say that the pew is likely an outlier, because biden's approval in a lot of other polls is in the 40s. not that you want to necessarily be, there but it's typically higher. congress is way lower. kevin mccarthy's is way lower. they are not doing things to make the lives of the american people better. they don't want congress to be focused on censoring adam schiff. they want them to be lowering their health care, they want them to be doing things to make their lives better.
here with this house. >> a bit. chris, i think that one that could work to the democrats advantage, and to joe biden's advantage. you just gave a pretty effective outline of everything going on there. with a little detail, marjorie taylor greene and lauren boebert in serum sort of version of a catfight today about who is going to be putting forward articles of impeachment, or trying to impeach the president. this is ultimately not what the public cares about. it's not what they want congress to do for them, what they want government to do for them. well, yes there are a range of polls out there, i would say that the pew is likely an outlier, because biden's approval in a lot of other polls is in the 40s. not that you want to necessarily be, there but it's typically higher. congress is way lower. kevin mccarthy's is way lower. they are not doing things to make the lives of the american people better. they don't want congress to be
military are struggling to hit recruitment goals, fewer young people joining or qualifying to do so. but one group is energizing high school students about the armed forces and to see it is a viable path forward. founder and president of salutes, a non-profit organization. ken, good to be with you. you wrote an op-ed foxnews.com in which you praised the virtues of military service with the headline, our military recruitment crisis robs today's young adults of these life changing opportunities. outline for us, give us the ten second elevator speech here, how does military service change people's lifetime opportunities. >> great to be with you on a very, very busy news day. so i'm a shining example of that. i joined the army many, many years and like many people, many veterans tell you, leadership
the leader gives an outline of what the leader of the opposition has been saying about labour's plans for green energy, should they win the election next year. the former prime minister david cameron is set to give evidence shortly at the covid—19 public inquiry. it's the second week in the first phase of this inquiry, which is scrutinizing the uk's preparedness for a pandemic before covid hit in 2020, and looking at the government's decision—making in response to the outbreak. a number of high—level politicians and health officials are set to make an appearance this week for the inquiry. among them, we will hear from david cameron, the former prime minister. let's go live now to our health reporter, jim reed at the inquiry. david cameron is going to talk about the capabilities of the national health service prior to the onset of
detained in china and interestingly the topic of fantinel will come up. secretary clinton wants to address what he says are the role building materials for the powerful drug that has been coming from china and making its way across the border into the united states in the form of fantinel. again, no expectations for a big breakthrough here, the bar has really been lowered and the very least the us says this can lay the foundation and build the groundwork for further summits and further meetings between the us and china in months to come. well as those talks begin in the coming hours, our correspondent in beijing, stephen mcdonnel, will be keeping us updated, a short time ago he gave us an outline of what to expect. the first thing he will be doing, the first serious thing is meeting his chinese counterpart, chinese foreign ministerqin gang. then the us secretary of state
he was fired, one of which was classified that he leaked to his own attorneys who were not cleared for that information. was his home ever raided? was he ever indicted? that. of course he wasn't. same thing with bill clinton. >> he had all of those tapes as president trump outline in his speech tonight. >> was his home raided? no. the department justice defended bill clinton in front of a federal judge and said he has a right under the presidential records act to have those documents, including classified material. so trump's defense is going to be they'll file several motions challenging the indictment. they'll argue that the governing law is the presidential records act, which supplants a general statute such as the espionage act. all right. last, matt whitaker, we only have a second.
they don't want to end up on the witness stand when a client asks them to break the law. and they also don't want to risk their law license or liberty by actually potentially being engaging in any kind of crimes. >> i think you nailed it. >> going to be tough for him to build out his team. >> i think you nailed it. there are many ambitious lawyers describing the outline of a case that's going to be the case of a sergery. they would say, that's an interesting assignment, but you don't want to be in the history books the way mr. cork ran, mr. mcgahn, or john dean were,s this a theme we're exploring how the lawyers get in trouble with the client. thank you so much. >> thank you. on that related point we look at history, precedent, and we have the legendary watergate journalist and author bob woodward live on "the beat." the only place you'll see him tonight, next. m tonight, next. and only pays for what she needs. she picks her perks, and saves on every one.
feel. >> greg: yes, they are not elegant extremities by any means. nothing there goes together. it is a comical collection of odd features. >> see, greg, when i was a kid -- [laughter] -- i've never even seen my mother naked and she's passed away now. >> greg: thank god, i consider that lucky. >> so i never will. what i was going to say, i was a kid in the midwest. if you wanted to see a naked woman's body, you had to buy x-ray specks. then you had prayer of seeing faint outline of a woman's naked body. now there is no market, you walk into the spa. >> greg: it killed another industry. i've got to move on, dieing to
but the point is, he has said many times over he has emphasized the importance of the preservation of classified documents. so, it's not that the ignorance of the law would have been a defense anyway. but why put this in the indictment. what is the point in saying trump knew exactly what he was doing by keeping these documents, by manipulating them, by showing them to people, and by moving them around? >> the reason to do so is because part of what they anticipate is that they will be defense from the trump team that they threw the mistakes, that the did not really understand it details. he's a big picture guy he does understand the minute granular retails. what they are going to outline is he understood the importance of it before he was elected when he was elected they will have those witnesses come out of how he was informed of what these procedures were, how he understood how these procedures were put into place, and implemented them himself. and then once he left, they are going to have this testimony,