Stay updated with breaking news from Pete mcaleer. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
clearance. they're suing, but they gave us clearance are. but the charge -- i mean, it was, like, a weird charge. a little of this, a little of that, do a little of -- pete: set the arraignment date for four days before the rnc -- >> that's part of the game. pete: it is. someone suggested you could appeal straight to the supreme court because of the special nature of this case. when it comes to the -- [inaudible] and a judge could decide to say, hey, house arrest or even jail. >> i'm okay with it. if i saw one of my lawyers the other dayen on television all in all, you don't want to do that to the -- you don't beg for anything. it's just the way it is. think of it. they have all my books, hay went to -- for five years they sued me getting my tax returns. at the end of five years, they got 'em. the supreme court actually gave it to them. that was the end of it. that was it. they never found anything. they hired the best accounting
pete: because one of the questions we asked him -- good morning -- rachel: good morning -- pete: what's the first thing you do when you can get up in the morning, and he said i just love life. i don't sleep much -- rachel: he said i don't do that as a badge of honor, not bragging about it, it's who i am. pete: it's true, most of us couldn't do that kind of day. rachel: certainly, his opponent can't. and if they thought that verdict or all of these trials are going to slow these guys down, he takes advantage -- pete: again, another new york city if appearance. will: rachel mentioned it, we did sit is down with donald trump yesterday. we ended up speaking with him for an hour and a half. we talked about his reaction to the verdict. we with talk thed the about whether or not he would use, and i think one of the most interesting moments in the interview, whether or not he would in turn use the doj to pursue his political opponents. in the past he has said he would
were reserved for members of the wedding party and the family. we want you to -- we want to know what you think. was the bride right to ask guests to not wear certain colors? you can let are us know at friends@foxnews.com. what do you guys think? pete: seems fair to me. a. rachel: it does? pete: yeah. i feel like the bridal party's wearing these colors, don't wear them -- will: i feel like that's an unwritten rule. rachel: you don't wear white. pete: you don't want to wear -- rachel: i never had a bridal party. i just got married, you know, with sean. that was it. [laughter] pete: but most people do -- rachel: most white people do. [laughter] pete: maybe that's what it is. will: i didn't know that was a racial thing. rachel: it was a little bit. pete: or a catholic thing? ray i don't know. i never had one. [laughter] pete: we'll get to the bottom of it. rachel: we'll get to the bottom
they could -- the judge could decide to say, hey, house arrest or even jail. how do you face -- >> i'm okay with it. i saw one of my lawyers the other day on television saying, oh, no, you don't want to do that to the president. you don't beg for anything. it's just the way it is. pete: interesting, how candid he was and comfortable in the moment in a a way in which most americans, anybody, human beings facing the idea of arrest or house arrest facing the biggest campaign of your life, might be later bit more uneasy about it. but he seems content with what's happening and how to move forward. will: it is a pretty shocking answer, you know? if they put me in jail, they put me in jail. and he said he doesn't think the public will have the appetite for it. he does point to an inflection point in america. you see the weaponization of the doj. and, by the way, that is pretty much a bipartisan consensus at this point. only the far left seems to think this was an application of justice. you have bill ackman, you have
chaos internationally. pete: you have joe biden touting this plan that hamas put out a statement saying we love this. it's basically a ceasefire, and hamas stays, and the hostages come back which is a good thing, but ultimately, hamas loves it. why does our white house love something hamas loves? >> that's a great question. what exactly are we asking for here? the israelis are simply asking that the palestinians and hamas be dismantled, they return the hostages, and then they'll enter negotiations for a more sustained peace. rye now we want to placate hamas in a way that's really egregious. i think there's a very healthy sense of wanting to insure there's a cessation of conflict there. most people don't want to see the war drag on further, but at the same time, israel must secure its border and protect their citizenry. pete: the pier, it's a serious is re-election of the failure of the united states military. it was put in place by our
for the hills because it's nasty. this is a nasty business with. this is a nasty world -- pete: how do you find -- >> i know barr, barr was threatened. in all fairness to him, he didn't want -- you know, he was attorney general. he was a respected guy. and they said they were going to impeach him. i understand that. i said i got impeached twice and my numbers went up, which is unusual. i said it's not so bad. to be impeached. he had no idea what they were going to -- but he was going to be impeached. they didn't know why. it's like they took me to trial, there was no crime. they were trying to devise a crime during the trial, that's how bad it was. but with barr, you know, he let me down. he let me down. he let down our country. he endorsed me the other day, as you saw, but he let down our country. it takes a brave personned to do it. people don't want to be impeached, they don't want to be indicted by these scoundrels who are much more evil than
into this, by the way, how to you deport illegal imgrabs, how to you do these things. and i think it is important to remember you let the person who with says this is going to be my goal, and i do have to hire the right people to implement that. rachel: it did sound like this was some reflection on his part. he did talk a lot about the mistakes he made, those people that didn't seven him well. i think there's been reflection. that's the impression i got. and i agree, these are broad strokes. and he said, you know, i respect these world leaders, you'll see this later on in the club -- clip, i respect this leader if that leader because they care about their own country. we've got to start putting our country first. a lot more coming up, you guys. pete: some good insight from the produce producers of the will cain show. no wonder it's such a good show. will: i want to tell you this, how much throughout the morning, we will air the whole thing -- rachel: on the will cain show. will: go subscribe, and you can
the military. will: yeah. you know, we're going to be playing different parts of this throughout the morning, and it strikes me if -- so last night after the interview the three of us sat down, had a meal together, and we talked. and to be honest, i think there was a sense we wish we could get some more specifics on some things, if we're being fair. i was texting with the producers of the will cain show, and they said, you know, the president's job isn't to lay out the specifics of policy, it's to lay out a grand vision of where you want to take the country. and he said it about the superintendents of a buildingful you hire the right people to implement the specifics, and obviously that's going to be a big thing for president trump, should he be elected people, finding the right people. -- be elected president. pete: and he spent a lot of time talking about the people that weren't the right people. will: how do you end the war in ukraine? how do you deport -- and we get
and in latin america people think this is, like, i mean, they can't believe what they're seeing because this is the kind of tough they see in their dysfunctional, corruption countries, but it seems -- speaks to how corrupt we are. and i think congress can do a lot more in this process. even the jack smith if trial, that's still, you know, out there, and that was funded by the doj. i mean, there are opportunities to use the pursestrings that congress has not used, and and there are other things that prosecutors in different states can use, and that's been something happening on social media where people are, like, maybe this is the time for knew hullly assured destruction -- mutually assured destruction. do to the democrats what they have tone to the republicans. a love of people, we don't want to go this, but what's the answer to this? pete: the other thing that struck me was, yes, he answered the questions, but how often a he went back to policy issues. rachel: that's true. pete: kept going back to energy, to the border, to military, to
pete: let's put something in that wasn't designed for those waters for a political outcome. that's not what our folks in uniform are supposed to be used for. cameron hamilton, thank you for your time. we appreciate it. >> thank you. pete: that a kind of moment of the pier breaking apart is reminisce is sent of what happened in afghanistan, something we talked to donald trump about at length last night as a well, and you'll hear more so from. because the failure in afghanistan is a failure of military leadership to stand up and tell the truth about the implications of policies. and that's why you should check out my new book, "the war on warriors." it's out on tuesday. if you order it right now, you'll have it on tuesday. and it outlines the devastating impact of what happened in afghanistan, what military leaders or should have been willing to do, how our commander or in chief abandoned the troops and what it says about a capabilities going forward and the world's perception of our fighting men and women. we tell the truth about that and what else is happening in our military. "war on warriors."