Stay updated with breaking news from Secretary . Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the united nations has been railing against polluters and petro states for years. >> he is using this report to plead with world leaders to cut dirty fuels faster than ever. to kick in more for unfair loss and damage and developing countries and to ban all advertising from oil, gas and coal companies. >> if you could see the inside of your engine we at chevron believe that nothing is more precious than life. >> what do you make of the secretary's general's decision to really take new steps to call for an end to fossil fuel advertising on television and radio to treat those ads the way you would for tobacco products, any policies that we can introduce it national level or even international agreements to actually change the way we rely on fossil fuels are important. so these, these actions, as you say, to treat fossil fuel adverts as if it would to be treats, ban in
the various— grab attention. we have seen it with the various policy announcements. they had _ the various policy announcements. they had far more compared with labour— they had far more compared with labour new eye—catching policy announcements since the culling of the election. because they need to, given— the election. because they need to, given where it appears they are opinion— given where it appears they are opinion poll wise. this given where it appears they are opinion poll wise.— given where it appears they are opinion poll wise. this letter was sent to labour _ opinion poll wise. this letter was sent to labour on _ opinion poll wise. this letter was sent to labour on the _ opinion poll wise. this letter was sent to labour on the third, i opinion poll wise. this letter was sent to labour on the third, the l sent to labour on the third, the debate was on the fourth, it got leaked to our colleague on the morning of the fifth. part of me thinks the published this on the third orfourth, we wouldn't thinks the published this on the third or fourth, we wouldn't be having this conversation or it may be rishi sunak wouldn't have said it. ., , , , , be rishi sunak wouldn't have said it. labour 'ust published yesterday. we it. labourjust published yesterday. we should say _ it. labourjust published yesterday. we should say that _ it. labourjust published yesterday. we should say that explicitly i it. labourjust published yesterday. we should say that explicitly so i it. labourjust published yesterday. we should say that explicitly so as l we should say that explicitly so as to not _ we should say that explicitly so as to not imply this was published by the service. they were responding to elected _ the service. they were responding to elected that darren the shadow chief secretary— elected that darren the shadow chief secretary to the treasury, had written — secretary to the treasury, had written to _ secretary to the treasury, had written to the permanent secretary of the _ written to the permanent secretary
wondering what took the administration so long to move on to these executive orders, they don't flip over some of these ideas they have, many saying too little too late. a hundred markers when i spoke to him yesterday said there are reasons for that. >> weeks later congress to act, they did not act once, they recently failed to act twice and we took this executive action. it is not too little or too late, we hope that congress would act, they failed to do so and the president exercised his executive authority as he has done now. >> neil: with us now, the speaker of the house to answer all of that, mike johnston kind enough to join us out of washington. >> hello neil, great to be with you. >> neil: what did you think about of the secretary saying this is on you and the federal -- end of the republicans, making it look like a sure thing, saint donald trump stopped you tag this is why the president had to step in and take matters into his own hands? >> or what i say as this is
director of the fbi testified for the fourth time in congress that all the red lights are flashing meaning we are in serious danger on the homeland now because they have allowed all of these dangerous elements to come into our country, it is a maddening. they should have closed on day one but the captured open this long because they wanted to and everybody knows that. >> neil: you know, most of the president and the secretary as you know speaker have said, -- both -- they were not sucking up to donald trump and doing his bidding, we would not be where we are in right now. that version of it would have passed and it's kind of water the president is doing with these executive actions would be a moot point? >> you never send a bill over from of the synagogue it was a half measure. it would have not solve the problem. january 3rd of this to, 64 has republicans out of the border, largest contingency of congres members that went to the eagle pass, the epicenter of all the
feeling for the last two years. but it also gives us the next generation ofjobs. other countries have realised renewables is the future. they're in the race. i want the uk to be in the race. i want us to win the race. labour is pledging a �*proper�* windfall tax in line with the secretary generals demands. which will help fund some of its other pledges. but they have been attacked by the conservatives and on monday night, by the snp leaderjohn swinney, whose party has also been rolling back its previous green commitments. full tax on the oil and gas giants to make sure we're putting more money into people's pockets to lower the bills, as well as investing in the clean energy of the future so we can lower bills for good. danger of your position on us is that that is going to lead to the loss of tens
as you would expect, labour is furious. here's our political editor chris mason. 0n last night's tv debate, rishi sunak said this. higher taxes, £2000 worth of higher taxes under the labour party. and again. by saddling them with £2000 worth of higher taxes. and over and over again. independent treasury officials have costed labour's policies, and they amount to a £2000 tax rise for every working family. keir starmer did eventually say it was false, but that wasn't the end of it. here was one of the prime minister's closest allies on the breakfast sofa this morning. i have worked in the treasury, and i can tell you these are brilliant independent civil servants, and they would not be putting anything dodgy in there. these are all the policies that have been set up by the labour party, and actually, if anything, they are underestimating the cost to families. and look at what she said next. it has been signed off by the permanent secretary of the treasury... yes, the most senior civil servant
we all know from all of the trump-supporting republicans. >> and the secretary of skate that is says that. there's an interesting wrinkle. it allows any third-party candy to be on the ballot. there may be some gamesmanship in terms of kennedy. the homeless people in georgia, which is close to 10,000, so they're making it harder for homeless people in georgia to vote, which is already underserved and low-information segment. so, this push is ongoing. when you look -- it's similarly successful. marc has talked about this, too. there's buckets of ballots that would not count. there were 8500 that arrived a
into the mainstream. camerata benito mussolini! all: presente! my name is roberto fiore and i'm the national secretary of forza nuova. i define myself as someone who really, who has certainly got, some ideas, some inspiration by certain parts of fascism. are you a fascist? if you ask me like that, i probably would say yes, but i have to complete the term and say i'm a revolutionary. italy hasn't got the intelligence and the courage to say, well, 0k, fascism was good on this and this and that, and maybe not good in other things. so as a reaction, i really, i accept, i don't refuse the term of fascism. but are you denying that the fascist regime
they are going to allow 2500 people in between ports of entry with the border reopening only once the number declines to 1500. this is going according to people familiar with what is he going to roll out. if you are unaccompanied minor you get in regardless. i understand humanitarian perspective but if that is in fact the fact, people send more and more kids through who eventually send for their parents if they don't get lost. so your thoughts about those numbers? >> sure, 2500 again that's just the border patrol illegal apprehensions and, again, that is authorizing a level of illegal crossings that we have never seen before. and i think it's important to remember that obama's dhs secretary said 1,000 a day you are at crisis level. so this is, you know, 2.5 times that that the biden administration is talking about. but, it also doesn't prevent the biden administration from continuing to push these individuals to ports of entry. and so you really have to look at all the different ways cbp 1
Outnumbered vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.