Live Breaking News & Updates on State proceeding

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from State proceeding on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in State proceeding and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

about removal that they are going to remove the case to federal court. and if they do, it's still the same georgia prosecutors. and the calendar could even be even claver at the federal level. i don't know. it's just eight different jury pool. broader, wider. so, that's what's likely to slow it down, kaitlan, the removal proceedings. >> so you don't think they'll likely be able to get it removed from a state proceeding -- as mark meadows is doing -- but also we are told by sources that trump is also likely to do that. you don't think that's likely? >> i don't. it's hard to envision this as official behavior of any of the people when you read that indictment, when you read what is being included. mark meadows was not just setting up meetings, he was not arranging telephone calls. that's done by secretaries, staffers, white house operators.

Case , Prosecutors , Georgia , Calendar , Federal-court , Removal , Level , Kaitlan-collins , State-proceeding , I-don-t-know , Jury-pool , Broader

BBC News

black women saw equaljustice in the united states of america. we can now speak to sonia gipson rankin, who's a law professor at the university of new mexico. she is also member of the new mexico supreme court commission on equity and justice. thank you so much forjoining us today. what do you think our viewers need to know about these new charges? i viewers need to know about these new charges?- viewers need to know about these new charges? i think it is really important _ these new charges? i think it is really important to - is really important to understand these are federal charges. it is different to any state proceeding and if they are against particular individuals. what the doj department ofjustice has determined or alleging is that they were particular behaviours by these officers that led to deprivation of ms breonna taylor constitutional right to be free from unlawful seizure. how did they come about at this point, so long after that initial incident?-

Us , Sonia-gipson-rankin , Equaljustice , Member , Saw , Law-professor , University-of-new-mexico , New-mexico-supreme-court-commission-on-equity , Charges , Viewers , Justice , Individuals

New Day Weekend

context of avoid, not pay for their responsibility. so with regard to how it affects it, though, it's early to tell, the federal bankruptcy court, which we saw early this year when he did the same thing, can delay a state proceeding. but i think when there's a delay, justice delayed would not be justice denied. again, very briefly, in the event you want to file bankruptcy protections, file them. they should be for legal purposes. the issue here is whether that was around a legitimate filing, and if not, if he's found responsible, he should pay up. >> the judge will have to approve, as i understand it, a bankruptcy. they'll probably look at all of these different things. he's tried this before. three smaller companies tied to jones declared bankruptcy earlier this year. i'm actually curious just about the pain that these families have experienced because of some of the things that he has said. and will that be something the

It , Thing , Federal-bankruptcy-court , Context , State-proceeding , Responsibility , Avoid , Issue , Event , Bankruptcy-protections , Purposes , Justice

Trump Demands Court Make New York AG Quit Investigating The President. By Which He Means HIM.

Stable genius!

New-york , United-states , Moriches , Alina-habba , Letitia-james , Donald-trump , Jay-sekulow , Brendak-sannes , Supreme-court , Office-of-the-attorney , York-supreme-court-justice-arthur-engoron , Pulitzer-committee

OPINION | Truth & Consequence (15): Liar-Liar JGO & Voters on FIRE!

“TRUMPISM & Toressism” seem to have the same political strategy when it comes to “admitting the truth and letting it be told” with the implementation of “lies, deflecting, gaslighting and

Congressional-committee , Us-congress , Us-department-of-justice , State-proceeding , Executive-assistant , President-trump , Congressional-investigation , Ambrose-bennett , Ruth-amp-consequence-15- ,

CNN Tonight With Don Lemon-20191008-05:48:00

what's your argument? >> i think it's exactly in the constitution, the supremacy clause, the idea of separation of powers. it may go to the supreme court ultimately. we're going to win this. you can sfnot have a president subject to 5,000 local district attorneys who have a bone to pick or thels president would be interfered with by local magistrates. i think we're going to win. you know what i think? he's wrong and he's going to be reversed. >> they're not asking for him. they're asking for documents relevant for an investigation. >> you mentioned clinton verses jones. they said it did not raise that issue the idea of a state proceeding interfering with the office of president of the united states in a criminal process. so i completely disagree.

Supremacy-clause , Argument , Supreme-court , Separation-of-powers , President , District-attorneys , President-subject , Thels , Local-magistrates , A-bone-to-pick , 5000 , Investigation

CNN Special Report-20191008-01:48:00

certainly not from the constitution. i think you don't have basis and you don't have an application. you're going to lose. what's your argument? >> i think it's exactly in the constitution, the supremacy clause, the whole idea of separation of powers. i this i we'nk we going to win. we're going to win this. here's why. you cannot have a president subject to 5,000 local district courts w-- district attorneys wo have a problem with the president of the united states. i saw the district court's opinion. i think he's wrong and he's going to be reversed. >> they're asking for documents that could be relevant to -- >> you mentioned clinton v. jones. they say it did not raise that issue of clinton versus jones, the idea of a state proceeding

It-constitution , Idea , Application , Supremacy-clause , Argument , Separation-of-powers , President-subject , Local-district-courts-w , 5000 , President , Problem , Americans

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell-20190920-05:48:00

it's called the anti-injunction act. and it says that no federal court can interfere with an ongoing state proceeding. so that when the judge finally has to rule on this outlandish claim that you cannot investigate criminality on the part of the president, his company and his cronies, the judge will have the obligation under the anti-injunction act, 28 usc 2283, to dismiss the case because it is not permissible for a federal court as a principle basically of states' rights, believe it or not, it's not permissible for a federal court to mess around with an ongoing state criminal proceeding. simple as that. and so -- >> professor, if that lawsuit -- >> i was going to say, what's

State-proceeding , Judge , Court , Anti-injunction-act , Company , Part , Donald-trump , Usc , Criminality , Claim , Cronies , Us-supreme-court

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell-20190920-05:47:00

he's the co-author of "to end a presidency: the power of impeachment." professor tribe, i give you the lecture hall for can the president shoot someone on fifth avenue and the manhattan district attorney simply has to look the other way? >> the answer is no. we don't have a constitution, thank goodness, in which the president is that much above the law. but in fact, the position that his lawyers were taking today in the federal court filing is even more extreme than that. they have taken the position that the president's company cannot be investigated, that those who may have conspired with him to commit financial and other crimes cannot be investigated, that the whole state proceeding must be stopped in its tracks. among other things, there is a federal law going all the way back to the founding, actually to 1793.

Lawrence-tribe , Someone , Presidency , Fifth-avenue , Manhattan-district-attorney , Donald-trump , Co-author , Impeachment , Lecture-hall-for , Way , Fact , Position

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell-20190920-05:50:00

texaco, the u.s. supreme court said on behalf of one company that had lost a big judgment in a state court that it couldn't run off to federal court to kind of interrupt the state proceeding. the only way to get federal review of a state judgment is to let the state proceeding run its course and then take your chances with asking the u.s. supreme court to review the result. but the most important point, even more important than the fact that they've, you know, gone to the wrong court in order to try to hoodwink the judicial system. the most important point is that they've taken this outlandish position that says the president and all those around him are above the law. they can't be investigated for any crime no matter how serious until the president is out of office. well, he's basically inviting the country to kick him out of office so that he can be held accountable to the law.

Us-supreme-court , It , Review , State-proceeding , Company , State-court , Judgment , Behalf , State-judgment , Couldnt-run-off-to-federal-court , One , Course