Live Breaking News & Updates on Trickery

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Trickery on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Trickery and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Jawad Mensouri jailed for strangling Taranaki sex worker he hired through trickery

'I was banged up and bruised up, and I had these panic attacks for about six weeks after'.

New-plymouth , New-zealand-general- , New-zealand , Taranaki , Tony-greig , Jawad-mensouri , Plymouth-district-court , New-plymouth-district-court , Judge-tony , Judge-greig , Jawad

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

congress set the inauguration date as march 4th because that is the date, in 1789, that the constitution officially went into effect and became the law of the land, march 4th. on march 4th of next year, donald trump will stand trial in federal court in washington, d.c., on the charge of conspiracy to defraud the united states. donald trump is charged under a 1948 law on defrauding the united states, which was proceeded by a 19 09 version of the same law, which was interpreted by the supreme court in an opinion written by chief justice william howard taft in 1912 to mean, quote, to interfere with, or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft, or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. joining us now is bob woodward,

Effect , Constitution , Congress , March-4th , 4 , 1789 , Donald-j-trump , Us , Conspiracy , Charge , Washington-d-c- , Donald-trump-will-stand-trial-in-federal-court

The Last Word With Lawrence ODonnell

1861 on march 4th. congress set the inauguration date as march 4th because that is the date, in 1789, that the constitution officially went into effect and became the law of the land, march 4th. on march 4th of next year, donald trump will stand trial in federal court in washington, d. c., on the charge of conspiracy to defraud the united states. donald trump is charged under a 1948 law on defrauding the united states, which was proceeded by a 19 09 version of the same law, which was interpreted by the supreme court in an opinion written by chief justice william howard taft in 1912 to mean, quote, to interfere with, or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft, or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. joining us now is bob woodward, a two-time pulitzer prize -winning author and associate editor at the washington post where he has worked since 1971. his audio book, the trump tapes,

Effect , Constitution , Congress , March-4th , Law-of-the-land , On-march-4th-of-next , 1789 , 4 , 1861 , Donald-j-trump , Law , U-s-

CNN Newsroom Live

the kremlin something firm. clare our reporter describing all eyes on the kremlin right now. how do we actually decisively say that prigozhin is dead? do we need -- do we look at the language coming from the kremlin? how are you going to read it? >> we're dealing with the risk of russian trickery. anything coming out of the kremlin i think that we have to take with a degree of caution in terms of its accuracy and its intent. if we actually do get confirmation that prigozhin is dead through some sort of dna evidence or identification of a body, something along the lines of that, then i think that is pretty certain. but a statement out of the kremlin suggesting that prigozhin is dead, i'm not sure that we can totally trust that. given the way the previous march for justice rebellion occurred and then suddenly ended without warning and prigozhin was allowed to move about relatively

Something , Reporter , Yevgeny-prigozhin , Kremlin , Language , Eyes , Firm , Clare , Anything , Russian , Terms , Risk

Jesse Watters Primetime

trickery, forgery, deceit. fiduciarsponsibithe truth is, t a hell of a lot of money on him. and the fact tha t they told him he was adopted when he never was is very painful. >> either way, we'll never watch "the blind side" and sandra bullock and look at it quite the same way. >> again. it's a beautiful movie. and now you look at it lik beaute. >> oh, it's this is all a lie. but even things you want to believe aren't truehat's al.. precisely. so for us tonight, thank ngl for watching this specia with testing waters from judge jeanine pirro. my friend sean hannity is up next. audie >> look atnc this great audienca wow, what a great group of people. great to see you all. how are you?ea t to sthese are all my rowdy fra the only normal people in new york city. n newwelcome to "hannity". welcome to all of you at home. thank you for joining us. >> and tonight, a flagrant double standard in our great countrnight a ey the u.s.a. if e donald trump or if you are a trump supporter, you are notto allowed to ever dare question

Io-way , Money , Fact , Lot , Truth , Makinthe-adg , Lik-beaute , Tha-t , Forgery , The-blind-side , Deceit , Trickery

The Five

it was a conservatorship. that in itself may play into the idea that maybe he did need a guardian. he didn't know after all this time. there is no question that we need a forensic accountant to do an analysis of this. what he has his attorneys are saying is true, that there is $330 million not accounted for. it is not enough for the tuohy family to say it is so upsetting they would think that where they will have to really put up an answer. because this is outrageous. we are talking about trickery, forgery, and deceit. >> obviously, they made some money off the movie. they had a chain of fast food restaurants and made a lot of money when they sold it. $200 million. the idea that this is all a scam, i'm not sure what to believe. >> for a family when there's a family fight, i would rather crawl under the table and never have to hear any of it. i don't want anyone to fight. >> walked under. >> i had never hit my head on a table.

Idea , Conservatorship , Analysis , Question , Attorneys , Accountant , Guardian , Family , Saying , Answer , 30-million , 330-million

CNN This Morning

judge chutkan has been tough on the january 6th cases. to me the more telling quote judge chutkan the seriousness she views this, the sentencing of one of the january 6th rioters, this defendant did not go out of the capitol out of a sense of patriotic duty, he went in there for one man. that one man is now the person in front of her as a defendant. but there is not a conflict of interest here. the attacks on her are completely baseless and we should reject them. >> listening to trump's legal team, especially his lead counsel on this john lauro. he makes it sound like this is a slam dunk for us. i thought it was interesting when he said to dana yesterday, he cited supreme court precedent, saying it's all clear here. just look at what the supreme court did. i want to play that and get your reaction. >> the government alleges deceit or trickery and all of this played out in the open. it's all free speech. there was a supreme court decision right on point that says when you're exercising free

Judge , Plus-one , Defendant , Cases , January-6th , Tanya-chutkan , Quote-judge , Sentencing , Seriousness , Capitol-out , 6th-rioters , One

The Mehdi Hasan Show

craft, or trickery. and that is what trump did. that's how he allegedly conspired to defraud the u.s.. not in a financial way, but a very political and anti-democratic way. it's a felony under section 371 to do that. number three, this is politicized justice say the republicans, this is the target of their political opponent. and what about hunter biden? just have a read of a gop senator tim scott tweeted on tuesday in response to the indictment. quote, i remain concerned about the weaponization by biden's doj, what we see today are two different tracks of justice, one for political opponents and another for the sign of the current president. he continued, we are watching biden's doj continue to hunt republicans while protecting democrats. hunter republicans. hunter republicans. why haven't all the republican candidates running for president, including tim scott, been indicted? including especially trump's own vice president, mike pence?

Way , Trump , United-states , Section , Felony , Trickery , Craft , 371 , Excuse , Whose-board-hunter-biden , Number , Response

The Mehdi Hasan Show

follow. donald trump is being put on trial not for what he said but for what he did. number two, they say that donald trump is being indicted for defrauding the united states. but what he did doesn't meet the legal definition of fraud. conservative national review magazine put out an editorial slamming the indictment and said, as the supreme court reaffirmed a few weeks ago, fraud and federal criminal law as a scheme to swindle victims out of money or tangible property. yeah, but they got the wrong statute. sorry, guys, that was wire fraud. as long as ken white and ryan goodman on twitter have pointed out, the indictment charges trump with defrauding the u.s. until 18 u.s. section 371. here's how the supreme court defines defraud under that statute. quote, to just conspired to defraud the united states means primarily to the government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful government functions by deceit, craft, or trickery.

Trial , United-states , Doesn-t , Trump , Defrauding , Two , Excuse , Money , Fraud , Criminal-law , Property , Victims

State of the Union With Jake Tapper and Dana Bash

that's going to happen in the trial, and i'm just saying what's in the indictment. >> right. let me take the first thing, the question about electors, okay? alternate electors are used in every four-year cycles, okay? the senate parliamentarian acknowledged to vice president pence that they certified alternate electors and none of those electors were cowned. vice president pence was completely aware of the nature of the -- >> they weren't counted because mike pence rejected this scheme. that's why they weren't counted. >> absolutely. of course! and that's how the political process works. >> no, it doesn't. >> there was no trickery. there was no deceit, because if mike pence had said yes then that's exactly what would have happened. >> no because -- and that's only one -- i don't want to -- freedom of the press -- >> i don't want to go down. >> let me finish, though, no, but you asked me a question and i hope you can let me finish. >> go ahead. >> the government alleges deceit or trickery and all of this

Indictment , Electors , Thing , Trial , Senate , Question , Cycles , Four , Mike-pence , Vice-president , Pence , Nature