i'm erin burnett and "outfront" tonight, rejection and dysfunction. the house today rejecting the senate's plan to extend the payroll tax cut. now, that means that your taxes are going to go up somewhere between $700 and $2,300 next year unless, ooh, the big unless an all new congressional committee and it is an all new committee comes to the agreement by the year's end. president obama's approval ratings are up as congress falls on this, and he seized the moment today. >> but now, even though republicans and democrats in the senate were willing to compromise for the good of the country, a faction of republicans in the house are refusing to even vote on the senate bill. a bill that cuts taxes for 160 million americans. and because of their refusal to cooperate, all of those americans could face a tax hike in just 11 days. and millions of americans who are out there looking for work could find their unemployment insurance expired. >> and just for good measure the white house website prominently tonight displaying a countdown clock to place the blame squarely on congress, and if congress does not act, quote, it says that middle-class taxes increase. the president is pointing the finger at people including republican from texas michael burgess and a member of the tea party caucus who voted today proudly and openly so to reject the senate's two-month payroll extension. i asked him a while ago whether his vote was all about politics. >> i was satisfied that which got the message across that what the senate did was not satisfactory. people do need more than two months of stability. >> look, everyone agrees that a two-month extension is not acceptable and speaks to a lot of the problems in washington, but this is a big butt, representative boehner had come to a deal with the senate republicans and said he could get it through the house, the two-month extension and so who raised their hand and said yes? >> well, you have to ask the speaker and he is perfectly capable of speaking for himself on this, and you have, erin, identified the problem, that it is difficult the get a resolution on this. answer me this -- any easier in 60 days' time? >> why couldn't congress have this conversation earlier? i mean, did you for example know even when the senate passed this that you would vote, i mean, that the two month that you would have voted no no matter what? >> well, if they had asked me, i sure would. >> nobody asked you? >> harry reid said, look, this is the best we can do two months i would have said no sale, go back to work, because that is the correct answer. i cannot believe that a majority leader reid thought this was an acceptable solution to a problem. they were plagying a game of bet the clock and run out the clock, and this sun acceptable. so here we are, and saying it is the week before christmas and we are willing to work. american people are working christmas week, and we should be working. >> you are a member of the tea par ti caucus and scott brown, the republican from massachusetts said quote it angers me that house republicans would rather continue playing politics than finding solutions and their actions are going to hurt the american families and the fragile economy, and the americans are first and now is not the time to draw the line in the sand. >> with the greatest respect to the greatest deliberative body in the world, in two months' time, erin we will be having the argument again. i understand the pay-fors obstacle, but surely they can be overcome. >> well, you say surely they can be overcome and the reason that there is a two-month extension which stinks is because the democrats and the republicans wanted to get one year on it and there are ways to pay for it the people agreed on it, and the reason that we are only getting two months is because you could not agree how the pay for it. >> well, the way to pay for it in the senate currently is a new tax on mortgages and refinances and the problem here is that you get two month of relief and the tax goes on for ten years. we could find the correct cuts somewhere to offset the expenditures in this bill, and that is what should have happened. any time you enact a new tax, we all know this, you get the short period of benefits, but the tax never goes away. >> the tax cut is very hard to take away, whether it is a mortgage deduction or a charitable deduction or anything else, and in particular, we are talking about a payroll tax and that is what funds the social security and people are getting used to it, so taking thatway is now a tax increase. so do you believe we are in a position to have that tax so that we will never have a payroll tax again? >> well, i opposed it because of the reasons you just stated. once you provide relief on the payroll tax, you have reset the baseline and people's expectation has been reset. >> well, thank you very much, representative burgess, for taking the time. >> thank you, erin. the bottom line wherever you stand politically, congress is kicking the can down the road again by a two-month extention. we reached out to the the strike team, 24 ceos and entrepreneurs and inviser tos and come ought is the ceo of john mitchell enterprises. >> thank you, erin, and thank you for having me on. >> this is a pretty embarrassing situation, isn't it? >> well, it is extremely embarrassing to the the nation. give the people a one-year cut, and no big deal, but what is holding it up? it is called lobbyists. the party who is running the nation now with the democrats and the republicans are continuing this mess we are in. when the president ran he said i will knock out the lobbyists and it never happened. three years ago he said we will stop the lobbying and why is this hold up happening? it is the lobbyists. and they want the other bills pass and let's embarrass the president. it is not good for america. politicians, take your "we the people" and they should continue this thing for at least one year and decide the other things later on. we have politics going on and one group saying that they should not listen to the environmentalists in san francisco and only to please a few people and bring the pipeline in. listen to the people, and maybe it will affect your grandchildren and one doesn't know, but there is a solution to this. get the lobbyists out of there. pass it for one year, and all of the other things that you have, settle it in the next few months, but don't hurt middle america anymore, because they have been hurt enough. >> and let me ask you, john paul, because the issue of paying for it and what frustrated me is that this is what they all liked the democrats and the republicans and everybody liked it and everybody wanted it and no fight. >> made sense. >> and made sense and then there was a pipeline issue and could not agree to pay for it and burgess was saying, okay, well, now you will start to see the people paying more on the mortgages and we would pay it by increasing mortgage fees and it seems when you talk about paying for it, it is a third rail. >> what happens, erin, they missed the clock. when you had the super committee who knew nothing about business and some of them about taking care of lobbyists and not one of them ran a business. how do you get $2.2 trillion and they should have been going after $5.2 billion, and get cameras in there and get everybody to listenb what is going on and ask the others to say, hey, you throw in $1 trillion for the next few years and it will further reduce the budget. and here, let's get a balanced budget and get rid of the deficit and we need business people in politics and not people who don't know anything about businesses. america is one of the biggest businesses in the world, and the people who run it can't balance their budget. we need business people in there and lobbyists out of there. mr. president, you made that promise and you did not keep it. mr. president, and the administration before, no pork barrel spending and what are you adding on to this bill right now to help the middle-class? and more things to either pass this or we won't do it. it is not right for america, guys. america works and come together for a little bit and low the politics out and do the right thing. no one is going to hold it against you if you do the right thing right now, and do it even if it at the last minute. america needs you. >> and to make the final point here as a businessperson, do you think that the people who have had numbers of the payroll tax and if we don't extend it, it will hit growth and not enough to throw us back into recession, but what is your take on it, and is this tax one that is crucial? >> no, it is not crucial. but that extra $85 a month for people that are kind of struggling right now, it is a big difference and it won't hurt one bit to last one year. we are enough in debt now, and this should force them to say, wow, we went further in debt now, and robbing a little bit more from social security as all administrations have done for years now, and what can we do to run this like a business and balance it. we, the people, we will help you out and do it for free. if you have to pay us, give us a dollar, hey, we are here. >> all right. said from a man who went from living in his car to the very top. he will do it for a dollar. john paul, good to see you. a member of the strike team and you can go to the website to find out more about john paul dejoria and the other strike team members. and also, the chris christie's way into the election and he has one to slide into be the crack. and the highest ranking officer of the u.s. military says that iran's latest actions could draw america into war. and the dhs and we go out front with an exclusive tour with secretary janet napolitano, and 4.5 kilos of heroin. [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus presents: the cold truth. i habe a cohd. and i toog nyguil bud i'm stild stubbed up. [ male announcer ] sorry, buddy. truth is, nyquil doesn't un-stuff your nose. what? [ male announcer ] it doesn't have a decongestant. really? [ male announcer ] you need a more complete cold formula, like alka-seltzer plus liquid gels. it's specially formulated to fight your worst cold symptoms, plus relieve your stuffy nose. [ deep breath ] thank you! [ male announcer ] you're welcome. that's the cold truth! [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus liquid gels. ♪ oh what a relief it is! ♪ [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus liquid gels. this was the gulf's best tourism season in years. all because so many people came to louisiana... they came to see us in florida... make that alabama... make that mississippi. the best part of the gulf is wherever you choose... and now is a great time to discover it. this year millions of people did. we set all kinds of records. next year we're out to do even better. so come on down to louisiana... florida... alabama... mississippi. we can't wait to see you. brought to you by bp and all of us who call the gulf home. i took some steep risks in my teens. i'd never ride without one now. and since my doctor prescribed lipitor, i won't go without it for my high cholesterol and my risk of heart attack. why kid myself? diet and exercise weren't lowering my cholesterol enough. now i'm eating healthier, exercising more, taking lipitor. numbers don't lie. my cholesterol's stayed down. lipitor is fda approved to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who have heart disease or risk factors for heart disease. it's backed by over 19 years of research. [ female announcer ] lipitor is not for everyone, including people with liver problems and women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. you need simple blood tests to check for liver problems. tell your doctor if you are taking other medications, or if you have any muscle pain or weakness. this may be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. [ man ] still love that wind in my face! talk to your doctor. don't kid yourself about the risk of heart attack and stroke. if lipitor's been working for you, stay with it. lipitor may be available for as little as $4 a month with the lipitor co-pay card. terms and conditions apply. learn more at lipitorforyou.com. facebook.com has a new ad dress, and not the website, but the company. the 2000 person staff relocated to menlo park, california, this week, and the new digs are more like a college than a office. it show stlas a lot of money. the 10 million square feet has on site doctors and free dry cleaning and just like the sighfeld wisig "seinfeld," and anyone watch that with the 25% discount. well, i had a exclusive look of the google offices in new york city and they were cool, too, but no free dry cleaning and makes us think that there is some one upmanship, and that brings us to 150 which is the number of acres that apple has set aside in couupertino, california. and they have a space for fitness center and increase apple's current campus from 2.6 to 3.1 million square feet. the new apple looks more like a spaceship than a building that is set to launch in 2015, but is there free dry cleaning? two weeks until the iowa caucuses. if you are not thrilled with the candidates, how about this guy? >> barack obama who is probably the weakest president i have seen in my lifetime has no idea how to use the executive power and to stand up to utter hs nis name in the same breath as teddy roosevelt, are you kidding? >> that is chris christie and the new jersey governor says what he thinks. and this morning on joe and joe, we know he is not running, but there is a chance that he would be on the ballot, because the group americans elect is on a mission to get him on the ballot in all 50 states, and the group chosen by the people online and not by established parties. joining us now is the coo of americans elect elliott ackerman, and good to see you. that guy we saw there, chris christie, he could thee roreticy end up on a ballot, right? >> yes, he absolutely could, and think they what we are doing at america elects is opening up the political process but i get on the ballot in all 50 states and i'm talking to you from california we are with are certified and only 1.6 million people in the state of california have signed petitions to get a third choice on the ballot in 2012. >> you mentioned california and that was a big one, and you also got on the ballot in rhode island today. so how many states are you in? >> that is right. >> and do you think it is reasonable that you would be in the ballot in all 50? >> we are going to be on the ballot in all 50, and we have been at this for over a year now, and by new year's, we will have 2.5 million of the 2.9 million signatures that we need to get on the ballot in all 50 states so we are removing that barrier to entry and now the question is who are the american people going to choose and what is the alternative to what the democratic and the republican parties putting up this election psyche aed the continuing predictable failure of our governance out of washington, d.c. to do anything. >> and chris christie is a guy that a lot of people are in love with and a lot of people say that his hand was forced too early and he could be drafted, but he told joe amica that he does not regret getting out of the race. but theoretically, he could be on the ballot, but what happens if he is on it and he does not want to run? >> well, in america's elect, he can be drafted through america select, and this is an opportunity for everyday americans like chris christie or another candidate the speak out saying they are not satisfied with the choices, and they can participate in drafting for the candidates and show the individuals they have real support out there, and that is going to be starting here in january that the candidates can announce and draft movements and it is going to play out into june of 2012 where every registered voter can sign up at americans elect.org and participate in a nonpartisan nominating convention to put a third choice on the ballot in 0 2012. >> and if chris christie does not want to get in, he can put a person in his stead, but the person cannot be a candidate already? >> yes, this is putting a nonpartisan candidate on the ballot in all 50 states. listening to the guest before, we are seeing the hyperpartisan paralyzing the country. and we need one who does not owe their line to the parties. right now, we have the party bases are the party bosses and all of the 44% of the independents of the electorate are left out in the cold and politically homeless and none of us have a home. >> i like that politically homeless. good analogy, and now for those of you who like that idea or, well, not completely fed up with politics as usual and you have hope, this is something that got our attention today. >> cam pane finance law has made a mockery of our political campaign season. we really have to let the campaigns raise the money they need and just get rid of the super pacs. >> all right. that really upset john avalon who is sitting over there and you should have seen him in the meeting. and also with us is democratic strategies and national editor of govote.com, and the coauthor of the american party how we can save the american dream. and take it away, john aftvalon >> this is hypocrisy 101. he is on letterman and everywhere and we can all agree that politics ain't beanbag, but for a guy to talk about how distasteful super pacs are, they are dropping millions of ads negatively against his rival for him, i mean, come on. this is what drives people crazy about politics. >> this ad. >> yes. and newt gingrich is unilaterally disarmed here. the idea that the candidates are powerless over the pac, and yes, there is to be no contact with the pac, and they set the tone, for this guy to set the tone above the fray while they are dropping millions of dollars a day to drop bombs on newt gingrich, come on. >> and jamal, there are guys that the president didn't have authority over and spent years working for the president and now they run it is what frustrates people about politics in general, this rhetorical separation. >> it is frustrating, but you know what else? mitt romney not only does he have this pac working for him, but in july and august, he was doing events with the super pac, because there is a loophole to go to the event as long as he did not ask for money, and they were able to have him at an event. so, you know, all of the candidates are in it. everybody's hands have a little bit of dirt on them, and the problem is that the supreme court passed the rule a while ago and we are all stuck in the mess. we are basically back to where we were before watergate and in fact, may be even less regulated, because it is not in the campaign or the democratic or the republican parties and in the third party reports to not report, and it is a mess. >> ryan? >> you e no, i have to say that i completely disagree with john and jamal. the problem is that we tried to regulate the system post watergate and every time we try to regulate the system, the money is moving in a different system. what mitt romney said is sound. when the money is raised by the campaign, then the candidate has to take responsibility for it and you cannot dodge it. you have a ton of super pacs backed by labor and folks in hollywood like jeff catsenberg, and that is free game, because it is free speech, but if the candidates were raising that money, another great thing happens, the democrats and the republican party can easily raise that money from the interested folks and channel the money to candidates who are not self-funders or rich or military vet van erans or veterans who c raise the money from the wealthy friends, and that is what romney backed and that is what i was impressed by. >> this is the debate in the meeting with john avalon and i were talking and i hear the frustration, but mitt romney hates the super pac, bu