0 this back the most talented home cooks return for a second chance every evening and you can watch them of a little bit or go with a shot at redemption . no mistakes we made. we just will step up to finally be made masterchef finale worthy to all new wednesdays on fox and watch any e time on fox. our hulu believing i welcome the tucker carlson site. >> this is a fox is alert facing almost certain defeat for his party in the midterm elections five months from now, joe biden has become desperate . he's decided to leverage the murder of nineteen children in texas last week for political advantage. he just spoke at some thanks from the white house about the need to disarm the population. we're going to spare you all of it. we've taken a few select sound bites to sum up the president's message. >> here they are second amendment, like all other rights, is not absolute. this isn't about taking away women's rights. it's about protecting children. it's about protecting families. it's about protecting whol communities. in it's about protecting our freedom to go to d school, ton a grocery store, to a church not being shotca, killed. wet need to ban assault weapons and high capacity magazinest . and if we can't ban assaultch weapons, then we shouldur raise the age to purchase them fromth eighteen toe twenty one , strengthen background checks and that safe storage and red r flag laws repeal the immunity that protects gun manufacturers from liability. addressom a mental health crisis deepening the trauma of gun violence and as a consequence ofin that violence, these are rational, common sense measures. aasures. i believe this time a majority of the american people won't give up either. give up either. will act. >> so t to summarize the president's remarks tonight , your constitutional rights are not absoluteur c a. but in taking them away, we're not actually taking away your rights for protecting children to which you might ask am i a threat to children that question is never answeredt by the president. the point of this , of course,or is to disarm people who did not vote for joe biden. and that is why simultaneous with this this effort to recategorize the guns in your closet as felonies, democrats have been failing to prosecute gun crimes in our cities where most of the crime is. and if you're at all confused about whether the effort here is selective, if this is enforcement only certain people, you'll noticeid the president never mentioned the apparent federal gun felonyn his own son committed when he lied on a federal background form when he bought a handgun. didn't't mention just department has completely ignored it. instead, biden'slo fellow democrats in the house of representatives spent the day debating ways to disarm you.n americans have committed no crime at all and want only to protect themselves and their families. democrats plan to criminalize democrats plan to criminalize large capacity ammunition feeding devices. that is specifically any magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition was it turnst t out that is most magazines in thee united states. tens of millions of americans right now have so-called high capacity magazines in theiril homes. they're not militia members. they're not gun nuts.em they'rebe normallorma people. and the reason they have them is because most modern handguns and rifles use that type ofhe magazine, the kind that joein biden is telling youg is threatening and esoteric. and these same firearms, the ones in your house right now will not accept the kind of diminished magazines joe biden is demanding you useseen and tht means in effect, all of w those guns will be banned. which gun specifically? well, for example, the glock 19 probably the most popularit handgun in the united states, the glock 19 comes from the manufacturer c with a 15 round magazine. now the black 19 is not an especially scary firearm. nt it'ser a workman like pistol. if a you have any interest in guns at all, you probably already own one . but under this bill, the glock 19 would ban illegal a felony sitting in your bedside table. i so many other popular firearms in the united states now it's about saving the children joe biden just told us . w but how many lives would this law save? well, we know the answer zero not one . we know that because there is precisely no evidence at allr and never has been that larger magazines somehow inspire mass shootingssh. oi but of course saving lives isin not the point of this . disarming you is the sort of congressman greg steube tried to explain that at a hearing today, the house judiciary committee watch how this unfolded. here's a gun i carry every single day to protect myself. my family, my wife, my home comes with a 15 round magazine . here's a seven round magazine which would be less than what it would be lawful under t the bill to become law. ithi doesn't fit. so this gun would be banned. so this gun would be banned. i'm at my house. i canho do whatever i want with. so you heard a voice in the background. greg fauci obviously knowsfi his way around firearms. that was his gunre. but off camera you heard sheila jackson lee of texas interrupting greg steube to tell him how to handle a firearm in his own home. so is sheila jackson lee a gun instructor now? what does she know about firearms ? k well, glad you asked. sheila jackson lee is the person who once explained to us that er 15 shoot 50 caliber rounds and way more than quote ten boxes, whatever that meansns. so sheila jackson lee knows literally nothing about firearms and yet she plans without shame to regulate them j but only regulate your guns. sheila jackson lee l is no intention of disarming her own bodyguards, for example, or on constituent the democrats bill contains an explicit exemption for bodyguards. even sheila jackson lee understands the people protectingit her family may need a lot more than ten rounds and most of them, terry, that is the washington post putn a quote american law enforcement officers p ubiquitously carry handguns with more than ten rounds of ammunition and often more than r fifteen. it is also why the rifles typically have 20 or 30 round magazines, not ten . now why would sheila jacksondy lee as bodyguards need all of those bulletsd? d why would anybody need all of those bullets? as chuck schumer often asks rhetorically? and the answer, of course, is because it's a dangerousus world and if you're serious about protecting the people you love, you will be serious about the firearm you carry. but it turns outbo we know this for a fact that democrats are not s serious about protecting you or your family and that's why they defunded your police and called you a racist for complaining about it as your city collapse. what they care about deeply,y, what they care about more thanve anything at alls is protectingir anything at alls is protectingir they're bodyguards will continue to get any kind of magaziness. they want.. and what they want are highf capacity magazines. democrats spent the rest of the day trying to figure out how to ban what joe biden has called ghost guns. those guns are scary. well, several states tried to ban ghost guns, but every state that has is run into the same problem. no one can say what a ghost gun is. it's a made up term. it has no meaning as a judgment about it. put it late last w yearhe when he struck down a ban on so-called ghost gunss, quote nevadans would face the risk ofn discriminatory enforcement by police and prosecutors alike is they and their sole ou they and their sole could label almost anything an unfinished frame, a receivert if it in any way resembles a firearms undefined frame or receiver. in other words, any gun could be a ghost gun if democratic operatives say it is. and of course that's the way g they like the bill beforee congress defines ghost gun as ah firearm, including certain firearm parts that does notni have the unique serial number engraved by a licensedct manufacturer. okay, but the question is whichrm part of a firearm shouldeq require engravedui serialon numbers? that's the question on that question. hangs whether or not your possession of this object is a felony or legal. now according to the bill, any quote essential component of the firearm would require engraved serial number. but here's the point. merrick garland gets to makeis the call. this bill grants merrick garland, who wasar cravenve and ruthless partisan. we known that for a fact at this point, grant merrick garland is the sole authority to define what an essentialod component is. and if merrick garland decides you've got a quote essential component that does not have a great show. no, you're going to jail. seese how this works. so once again, the point is not to stop school shootings. to stop school shootings. shooting with a so-called ghost gunn. if i you were interested in stopping school shootings and all of us should be , you would take s s a serious look at why they happen in the first place. face. them have in common?av bute no one in congress, n particularly the democratic side iso doing that . so this isn't an attempt tohi stop school shootings. it's not an attempt to make s this a safer country. ng this is exactly what it looks like the beginning of a plan to confiscate and criminalize firearms in the hands of the law abiding in this country. and if youco doubt that , knowou that nancy pelosi has already now she's going to introduce legislation banning so-called assault weapons next week assault weapons. what's an assault weapon? any gun that nancy pelosi bodyguards have that you should not be allowed to have? and there's also a newewt quote red flag law in progress. now that law would allow the governmental to seizebo firearms from anybody it wants, whetherdy they committed a crim. now under our current system, you have to be convicted in order to be punished.aw but under the red flag laws, if someone doesn't like the cut of your jib, you lose your constitutional right now that's t baldly unconstitutiona. and you know d it is because democrats are suddenly talking i about packing the supreme court in order to make it law. what you will not stop us from advancing the protecting ourpa kids act today. you will not stop us from passing it in the house next week and you will not stop us there if the filibuster obstructs us , we will abolishme obstructs us , we will abolishme we willl expand and we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation in our communities each and every day we will do whatever it takes to end gunke violence, whatever it takesde in our communities. really. what'sr the murder rateou in yoa community and what exactly have you done to make it better? nothing. mandir jones wants power. j a they all do and to that endte he wants to end the filibuster, he wants to end the filibuster, quote end gunun violence and lie . that raises a lot of questions. that raises a lot of questions. i don't have any ideaa what he's talking about like the details because you're a lawmakerr foxes hillary vonne caught up with him today. she wants to known what weapons of war he intends to ban. this is a revealing a strange watch this here's what he said. watch this here's what he said. of war outut of circulation. what is a weapon of war to you? assault weapons, assault weapons that like semiautomatic handguns, rifles, semi automatic weapons would qualify as assault weapons. and these are w things that should be banned. i must take almost every gun out of people's hands. i mean>> t i mean handguns, forw example, would not qualify under under what i just described. i got i'm sorry got. so yeah. mondher jones just explained. yeah. all semiautomatic weapons whichn weaponizes. yeah. yeah. handguns.ha sond youwa don't take everyone's guns away. nole's handguns wouldn't qualif? as assault weapons even though w he is to find assault weapons as any quote semi automatic weapon. so clearly bonder jones knows what hillary was trying to tell him that most firearms in this country, including most thi handguns are semiautomatic weapon. we don't have twenty calibers that are causing a ton of school shootings. but when hillary vonne pointsnt this out, bonder jones runs probably not back to his probably not back to his rate. he doesn't wantt to get to the details. so what are we looking at here? well, today a guy on twitter called spike cohen summed it up pretty nicely. here's what he wrote .t up quoteth the u.s. government has been arming ukraine because their allies, the u.s. government has been seeking to r disarm russia because their opponentss in totally unrelated news the u.s. government seeks to disarm you . well, exactly.in that's the framing. that's the truth. anyone who tries to disarm you by definition considers you an enemy . that's what you do toth your enemies. you disarm them, your friends, your allies, your children, people you love. why would you want to prevent them from defending themselves? you never wouldd.d. you someone scream at them from the podium about how they're killing children if they want toei protect their own family. that's what you dot' to your enemies. and yet somehow a lot of republicans, particularly republicans, particularly specifically, but a lot ofmo others, lindsey graham of south carolina don'tnt seem to understand this or maybe they do one who does is congressman w greg steube of florida. you saw him a moment ago. we're proud to have you join now.onroud to have you join congressman, thanks so much for coming on . that was one of m the most amazing ever seen. you'rere in your own home and sheila jackson lee tellshi you to put down the gun. what ist? this really about? a ndwell, and she also in thatde bill , they tell youn how to store it. you know,av joe biden just talkd about you have to have y a trigger locks. so when the person is breaking into your homeou, make sure you have your key next to you to have your key next to you to your gun and respond appropriatelyre. i was trying to highlight to the american people that this isn't just a magazine ban on rifles. this is every single semi-automatic weapon that takes more than a 10 round magazine would be banned three of which i just happened to have.that a and i showed to make it very clear that 10 round magazine doesn't fit in it. so by having the magazine ban, y you areou effective banning all of these handguns that millions, hundredsns of millions of americans use every, single day to defend themselves, their families to protect their homesteads want to make it really simple. why wouldn't congress requiresth it the laws it passes restricting banning handguns applies their own bodyguards if they're sincere, if highro capacity magazines are dangerous, then why should dangerous, then why should funded bodyguards get to carry them? i'm confused. well, and bush is on that t committee and she spends hundreds of thousands of dollars of her campaignhahe mony every single yearor for bodyguards and security. and i can guarantee sec they are using the exact same weapons that mr. jones you just t highlighted talked about banning as a quote assault rifle or assault weapon. o but i mean, why shouldn't the laws apply to the peoplehe who make the laws? that seems like absolutelyutut fairly solid yet. fairly solid yet. and that's that's the hypocrisy of the left. joe biden has all this security. nancy pelosi has allic the security, the capitol police have all the security yett y they want everyday americans like you and me at our homes and our businesses as we drive some ofon us that have concealed carry permits to not be able to useo the very weapons that we can utilize toli protect our homes, our families and our loved ones. and that's exactly what this isi all about. it's time to say no and thank you for doing that . i appreciate it. congressman rick steube of florida west , thanks for having me. good to see you. dana bash is a nationally syndicated radio show host and knows a lot about gun rights and joins us tonight. ken, thanks so much for coming on . i'm confused as to why anybody holding office as a o republican would even engage on this issue. prevent there is no good faith effort s to try to prevent school shootings, something that all people want and there ist tople want and there ist the law abiding. >>he a so why are they even plag along with this charade? a that's the million dollarin question, tucker . and thanks so much forg having me too, o by the way. w and i wouldn't count republicans out of that being on the wrong side of that because there's a couple of them in the senate that seem to think it's okay. red flag laws and the undoing of due process. but youhe bring up i the point that should be the focus of everything which is protection . that'ses the solution. right. the president of the united states has already said that he is not in support of hardening schools, for instance. now he has called predictinguc the recommendations, tucker , from the marjory stoneman douglaske commission and the sandy hook commission as well. both ofbo those commissions aftr those horrific tragedies concluded that , yeah, we need to look at n strengthening ourti school security, multiple layers of protection. wepl cannot have a serious a discussion in this country about stoppingse these tragedies until we are ready to discuss hardening soft targets. and furthermore, i'll add this if we're going to use criminal usage of legal to own inanimate objects as justification to penalize all law abiding people ,then we need to look at just how many good law abiding people use firearms to protectev themselves every single day. i mean, you're looking. at anywhere between, you know, several hundred thousand up to h a couple of million depending on how that locality determines. tucker , that's an important part of this equatione that no one in d.c., at least on that side wants. they don't want to they don't want to address that and that'sh key and they're exemptingth themselves from their own restrictions. restrictions. in the world they created they made this country incredibly more dangerous than it wasas five years ago by defunding the police, they fly private. they've got bodyguards. why shouldn't they live with the consequences of t t what they did? and can i add, tucker , the gun free school zones act schools have been gun free zones since 1990. nm the federal government is going to make it to where m people can't carry on campusha and they're going to leave our kids unprotected. that's not acceptablet'ce. if they're going to disarm the people who want to protect those kids, then the governmente needs to step up and put saros in schools because i'm i'm not the type of mom that's going to stand there and get case to the ground while nobody goes in there toele stop an active shooter. well, that's for sure. i'm a good teacher. thank you . thank you , tucker . soda the question if you really concerned about so-called gun violence and we are everybody shouldou thousands of americans die because they're shot to death every year mostly in our cities. ifha that bothered you, those ae your constituents, for example, or if you were just a decent person who cared about human life, then you would do somethinglig about the violencet where it was occurring. but they're doing the opposite . they're letting gun criminals off in city after city across america. buckosssa. sexton has been follg this shocking trend, host of the clay travis and buck sextonom show former cia officer we're happy to have him, but thanks so much forap coming on . s socr how can you scream about gn violence and then as a matter of policy, let gun criminals go ? well, this all stretches back years now to the end mass incarceration talking point that progressive prosecutorinca, whether it's krasnov, gascon, you name it tim fox in chicago, san t francisco, philadelphia, new york city. look at the prosecutorsrs and all these places they were talking