Stay updated with breaking news from Dichbs. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
which was a very good one. the reality is that there is much, much more. just like the police were not forthcoming with the public, for good reason. you want to protect the investigation. i'm sure there's a bevy of other information that may connect him to this days, establish his guilt, and cut out a lot of work for the defense to do in demonstrating he is not guilty. >> is find ago i motive essential for prosecutors? they like to have a story go with evidence. >> there's an important dichbs between intent and motive. you do have to prove intent, which is the person intended to kill. you do not have to prove motive. you would like to show the why, the motive, but you don't have to. sometimes you can't. sometimes the motive inexplicable, by star. they hint at the motive. they talk about how they use the phrase stalking in the affidavit. dough not have to show motive. it's good if you can, but it's not required. >> elie honig, appreciate it. great news we want to share regarding the health of buffalo
the union." the gun deal with backed by 10 senate republicans. just released the statement on the negotiating group and he said, quote, i continue to hope the discussions yield a bipartisan product that makes significant headway on key issues like mental health and school safety, respects the second amendment and earns broad support in the senate, and makes a dichbs for our country. this is the closest to any action on gun violence. joining me now someone of the democratic senators involved in these negotiations, chris coons of delaware. thank you so much for jumping on with us. i appreciate it, senator. so first of all, tell us about these negotiations, how you got to the agreement that you released just minutes ago. >> thank you. i am so grateful for the
family and the public at larm papts answer. there is a dichbs between stone walling and saying to people we nus do a detail and full invasion. huh about speaking to each of the officers. noose spot either son, to this day, they never done this ta. they did a quick exam mission about him being on the witness. they didn't you go in. >> let's just pate and speak to the officer and book at everything. if there are things that needs to be done or officers need to face criminal charges, we'll get to that. a whisk of judgment. >> i juns your marc position. we can both agree that our level of patience and time wide will
cetera. my point is at end of the day all they wound up doing is helping ronald reagan who won a 49 state landslide and carried the day on the issues. just cautioning, what they did is magnificent, god bless them. good for them, that's their point of view. but just because you do that doesn't mean you'll carry the day. >> the dichbs is -- difference is the one with ronald reagan was not worldwide. >> i thought some in london and paris. >> but the scope and magnitude of this. we'll continue to discuss, blame him pour taking your time in the first segment jim. we'll come back. massive crowds marching against the president but he cares a lot more about the size of another crowd at yesterday's inauguration and his press secretary is hot under the collar about that tonight.
back to the primary and why he won, i think that your argument is probably dilt to bear out data wise that he won because of an ideological difference versus all the campaign and dichbs that we both know and can point to. >> you know exactly why hillary clinton lost the midwest. >> because people voted for barack obama twice chose to vote for donald trump? >> it turns out when there's 80,000 votes across four states there's lots of reasons why someone may have lost. thank you for your time tonight. a member of the electoral college just announced he won't file his vote for donald trump. there's a move to get others to follow suit. christopher suprin made his case today in "the new york times." electors of conscious can still o do the right thing for the country. they should unify behind an honorable or qualified man or woman such as governor john kasich of ohio. >> objectively i can look at the
believe in the invisible hand, we believe in the strong hands of donald trump to reach in and move things around so that outcomes the market produces are favorable to the american worker? >> so i don't think that's what donald trump stands for. and so i don't think that's also why he won. i think that if we want to go back to the primary and why he won, i think that your argument is probably dilt to bear out data wise that he won because of an ideological difference versus all the campaign and dichbs that we both know and can point to. >> you know exactly why hillary clinton lost the midwest. >> because people voted for barack obama twice chose to vote for donald trump? >> it turns out when there's 80,000 votes across four states there's lots of reasons why someone may have lost. thank you for your time tonight. a member of the electoral college just announced he won't file his vote for donald trump. there's a move to get others to follow suit. christopher suprin made his case
forward and completely just destroyed cosby saying that he drugged them, had sexual relations with them? cosby hasn't said anything about it. but do you think that these women will now -- a similar kind of -- >> see, that's the wild card. the wild card always is, the person has their perspective and collins is out there with his perce perspective. there may be additional women that say, he's done something a little bit more. >> there's a big dichbs in the cases, though, because cosby is a cultural icon. collins, i think, is a sort of a largely forgotten figure involved in an old tv show. so i think the likelihood of women coming out against cosby is much greater than people bothering collins. >> a predator is a predator. all right. gentlemen, paul callan, joey jackson, appreciate you being on the show. in another news, american
the nra leadership is out of step with its own leadership and out of step with the majority of americans and there was a difference, i think it's important to say, there's a dichbs between the protection of rights and the protection of profits. nra leadership is trying to protect the profits not the rights of the leadership. >> if you notice, there's overwhelming support among americans for background checks. we have them as a matter of fact. but getting back to the assault weapons ban, it's significant that joe biden did not mention that. as senator majority lead harry reid said does not support a assault weapon's ban. one of the republicans voted against renewing the assault weapon's ban. i think the democrats are understanding that it's a political dynamite for them if they push hard on it. >> they know it's not going to happen. >> exactly.
say -- we asked 22, 23 different topics, whether americans related more to the democratic party or the republican party. 22 of the 23, they appeal more to democrats. >> yeah. >> it is a generalized, massive branding problem over what's happened nationally over the past year. >> except in the south. >> the piece, in part, points out that unlike people who sit around here, most people, normal people out there in america react emotionally to politics when they hear phrases, they react emotionally. does this represent hope? fear? they go with hope. >> there's also some substance to it. that the republican party in washington is taking positions that the democrats have correctly shown to be inimacable. there's a big difference. huge dichbs. >> what a difference between the
can't believe they did that, but they don't do it anymore, but don't prosecute. do you think the justice department will follow up? two, if they don't, does that send a message that if you're a rep administration, don't worry about it, it's not really against the law, just a dichbs the opinion? >> it's slightly complicated by the peculiarities of this law. the general is they kicking out of office. obviously that can't happen. the second, there's a requirement that the office make a referral to the justice department asking for a criminal prosecution. in this case the office did no do that, so the justice department isn't completely free to initiate the prosecution on its own. does that mean there's no remedy at all? at the very least, people could demand the republican national committee reimburse taxpayers for the illegally spent money they weren't supposed to have used on these supposed political trips packaged as business trips. the democrats in congress could