netanyahu that fighting against hamas in rafah will not stop, but mr netanyahu reportedly called the move "unacceptable". he is under strong pressure from far—right members of his coalition government to reject any pauses in the conflict until hamas is totally defeated. in a sign of further tension between the israeli army and those far—right parties, the army's chief—of—staff said sunday there is a "clear need" to conscript ultra—orthodox jewish israelis, who are currently exempt from military service. that's a change mr netanyahu's coalition partners firmly oppose. sunday marks the festival of eid al—adha, one of islam's holiest days. there was a notable lull in fighting, with gaza's hamas—run civil defence agency telling the afp news agency that, quote, "calm has prevailed across all of gaza". lucy williamson reports from jerusalem. allahu akbar. in gaza, they stood to pray in places with little else left standing. the festival after eid al—adha, marking another milestone in this war. those for whom conflict and celebration are new. those who have lived through them many times before. translation: for all muslims, eid means sacrificing animals, l to shed blood, but this eid, there are no sacrificed animals. now, we sacrifice ourselves. we sacrifice our own bodies. agencies warn a lack of aid is causing acute malnutrition in gaza. today, confusion over a limited daily truce announced by the army along a key aid route. it sparked fury from israel's far—right ministers and a rapid army response to say the fighting in gaza wouldn't stop. but the costs of this war are also pressing on israel's prime minister. 11 soldiers killed in gaza yesterday. his instruction to dismantle the hamas army has left his soldiers still facing a guerrilla war. translation: when the price is so heavy, we will remember what we are fighting for. we are fighting to ensure our existence and our future. we are fighting to return all our hostages. mr netanyahu's room for manoeuvre on gaza is narrowing. protesters last night called again for an end to the war. but ending it now probably means an end to his government. and the rhetoric over gaza is straining to mask the reality of his choices. caught between his promise of total victory and the prospect of a forever war. lucy williamson, bbc news, jerusalem. as we've been reporting, tensions escalated this week between israel and hezbollah, an islamist armed group based in lebanon. on sunday night, the white house announced it is sending a senior official to the region to try to calm the situation. deputy special assistant to the president, amos hochstein, seen here on a visit to saudi arabia in 2022, will fly to israel on monday, for meetings with top officials. the biden administration has long expressed concern that the israel—gaza war could spread further in the region. president volodymyr zelenesky says ukraine would hold peace talks with russia, quote, "tomorrow", were moscow to pull its troops out of all ukrainian territories. a two—day summit in switzerland aimed at bringing peace to ukraine wrapped up on sunday. dozens of countries committed to ukraine's territorial integrity but the names of several countries were notably absent from the final communique. russia was not invited to the conference but mr zelensky says the results of the summit will be communicated to moscow. our eastern europe correspondent sarah rainsford sent this report from the summit. it was to this swiss mountain retreat that politicians came this weekend to talk peace — to discuss ending the biggest conflict in europe since the second world war. thank you very much. applause what they achieved was a joint declaration affirming ukraine's right not to be invaded. but some, including saudi arabia and india, didn't sign up. volodymyr zelensky is still hailing a great success, arguing the world must meet russia's full—scale invasion with full—scale diplomacy. are you worried that international support for ukraine on the battlefield, to win this on the battlefield, is weakening, and that's why you're talking peace? translation: it is not because we are weakerj that we are talking about peace. we have always called for peace. at the peak of wall we were talking about peace. we wanted the world to pressure russia to end the war and stop killing us. but ukraine's forces are under pressure on the battlefield. and ahead of the summit, vladimir putin issued his own peace proposal that was, in fact, a call for capitulation. instead, kyiv is trying to seize the initiative. the talks here focused on the easier issues to agree on, like the need to return soldiers and civilians from russian captivity. i was beaten and tortured every day, twice. maksym was held for 11 months, but he told me attempts to hammer out a peace plan now is not about abandoning the fight. we have enough people. we have enough brave to fight. and we just need weapon. ukraine didn't get the unreserved support here it was hoping for, but it did get the chance to stress its key message — that russia only understands strength on the battlefield, or in diplomacy. for more on this, i spoke with andrew d'anieri, a resident fellow in the eurasia center at the atlantic council. andrew, thank you forjoining us on bbc news. one of the aims of this summit was to engage countries, perhaps, with closer ties to russia. but looking at the finaljoint communique, the final joint communique, which the finaljoint communique, which was signed, you have countries like india, saudi arabia, for example, south africa are not signing it. what did you make of that? it is interesting. _ did you make of that? it is interesting. we _ did you make of that? it is interesting. we saw - did you make of that? it 3 interesting. we saw about 101 countries, international organisations and observer states join for this piece summit, which really takes the name from ukraine's peace formula, and the main focus of the summit wasn't to come up with some agreement but was to get broad agreement on three principles, which was ukraine's rights, not only to territorial integrity, but for nuclear safety in ukraine, especially with the largest nuclear reactor in europe, there. do advocate for the release of all prisoners, and the exchange of prisoners, and the exchange of prisoners and the release of ukrainian children in russia, in addition to safety of navigation in the black sea and an agreement against the weaponisation of grain. all of which russia has done. we have seen similar dynamics, countries like india, countries like brazil have sat on the sidelines for quite a while, here. india, for example, taking advantage of russia and be able to buy their energy at lower prices. it is disappointing to see india and brazil and other countries not sign on, but that shouldn't distract us from 78 other countries signing onto the agreement from ukraine. let's un-ack agreement from ukraine. let's un ack a agreement from ukraine. let's unpack a little _ agreement from ukraine. let's unpack a little bit _ agreement from ukraine. let's unpack a little bit the - unpack a little bit the different iterations and versions of his plans. before the start fit and came out saying essentially they could be peace if ukraine were to withdraw its own troops from areas that russia has occupied. volodymyr zelensky saying today instead that if russia pulled out all the troops there could be peace talks on monday, he said. both men appear pretty immovable in their stanzas. what do you think that's as overall about where any potential for peace could be? how far away from that point we could be? it how far away from that point we could be? , , could be? it is interesting. you hear _ could be? it is interesting. you hear analysts - could be? it is interesting. you hear analysts and - could be? it is interesting. . you hear analysts and experts and politicians on both sides of the atlantic and around the world saying "we should have peace in ukraine, come to some compromise" — but as bellamy putin laid out, that compromise is giving him a loaded gun and having him promise not to shoot. it hasn't worked in the past and it doesn't appear that vladimir putin would make good on that sort of agreement. so the ukrainian position is basically we want peace, we want all our territory that is rightfully ours from international border from 1991, and do not have russian soldiers and weapons territory, which, under international law, is a perfectly reasonable way to go about defending oneself from an aggressive war. so the main thing we should take from all of this is that bernie riordan's designs and ukraine haven't diminished. he still aims to subjugate ukraine and could go further than that. on the ukrainian side theyjust want to defend their territory and their people because they know the horrors that exist under russian occupation. let's touch a little _ under russian occupation. let's touch a little on _ under russian occupation. let's touch a little on the _ under russian occupation. let's touch a little on the situation i touch a little on the situation on the battlefield. president zelensky said at the summit, speaking to reporters, that he believed this situation had stabilised in kharkiv. but are you concerned that russia could launch an offensive on another front? ~ , ,., , launch an offensive on another front? ~ ,,., , �* front? absolutely. and we should keep _ front? absolutely. and we should keep a _ front? absolutely. and we should keep a watchful - front? absolutely. and we | should keep a watchful eye front? absolutely. and we - should keep a watchful eye on the kharkiv battlefield, the kharkiv directives there. just because the situation has stabilised doesn't mean russia is not a threat. we have seen that russia can launch these so—called blood bombs that are difficult for air defences to defend against, and civilian areas, especially. the way to blunt any further russian offensive is to give ukraine more license to strike russian military installations within russian borders. we saw the us and other allied countries allow ukraine to strike russian positions with some weapons, but they haven't given the go—ahead on all the weapons that we have provided, especially long—range rocket systems. they could strike exactly at these types of russian training centres, tank battalions, as well, and the locations from which russia is sending bombs at women, children, and families. lastly, andrew, looking _ children, and families. lastly, andrew, looking at _ children, and families. lastly, andrew, looking at the - children, and families. lastly, andrew, looking at the week. andrew, looking at the week that was for g7, some key commitments for ukraine, including the security deal for the united states. but also looking at comments we have heard from donald trump at a rally this saturday saying that essentially he would make sure that when it comes to us support he would have that settled them away to be in once again. how much of a concern do you see that as being for ukraine? it you see that as being for ukraine?— you see that as being for ukraine? , ., , ,., , ., ukraine? it is absolutely a concern- _ ukraine? it is absolutely a concern. trump _ ukraine? it is absolutely a concern. trump has - ukraine? it is absolutely a concern. trump has gone | ukraine? it is absolutely a - concern. trump has gone back and forth on what he thinks about ukraine to some extent. we had back when we were battling it out in congress for the ukraine supplemental, donald trump tweeted that ukraine, support for ukraine was important to the united states, allowing the package to go through. then we saw his comments most recently about, which are along the lines of his quote that he would end the war in one day. donald trump is someone who is long on rhetoric but always uncertain in his actions. it is unlikely that us policy would improve dramatically under a trump presidency, but we don't know exactly what the contours of that would look like. but in any case, in prospect of a trunk presidency does place a premium on getting ukraine the support they need right now that they need to defend themselves and kick russian soldiers out of ukrainian territory. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. let's look at another story making news. the uk shadow health secretary, wes streeting, has said he would have liked more ambition in labour's plans for social care. in an interview on sunday, he acknowledged that successive governments of all parties had failed to deal with problems in the care sector. a leading health think tank warns the nhs is facing its tightest spending limits in decades. the bbc�*s hannah miller has more on the major pa rties' spending plans. both labour and the conservatives have signed up to a plan to bring in thousands more so after the nhs, requiring funding to increase significantly to almost £200 billion by 2028. but this is the level of funding they have allocated in their manifestoes. around £20 billion less. the nuffield trust says it is tougher than during a steady. the liberal democrats have put slightly more. but the pledged figure from the liberal democrats for nhs spending doesn't include their seperately costed pledge to provide free personal care for older or disabled people. you're live with bbc news. australia's prime minister anthony albanese and chinese premier li qiang are meeting in canberra. it's part of a first visit to australia by a chinese premier in seven years.the two leaders are discussing trade and diplomatic ties, along with regional security issues. earlier, mr li made an offer at adelaide zoo to send australia two new pandas. two pandas already at the zoo are due to return home. the chinese premier's trip has also included a tour of winemakers in the famed barossa valley in south australia. beijing recently lifted tariffs on australian wine. the stakes for the two countries are high, with trade barriers by china on australian products costing exporters us$13 billion a year. but relations have since thawed, with prime minister anthony albanese's government adopting a softer diplomatic approach towards china. last year, two—way trade with china grew more than 9%, to some us$216 billion. now, china is by far australia's biggest trading partner, taking in over 50% of its exports last year — mainly iron ore and coal. former us ambassador to china, max baucus, told the bbc the visit is a key moment between the two countries after years of a deteoriorating relationship. china and australia have been working very hard in the last several weeks to make this visit successful. that isn'tjust pandas but also the announcement of australia being able to ship a lot more agricultural products, including wines, to china. basically, it's reparation of a breach that occurred not too long ago, when australia pushed china to agree to a who representative investigating the origin of the wuhan virus. and that really upset china, china said "ok, we won't take your agriculture products as a result of this." and even more importantly, the more significant point, this shows that countries in the south, such as australia, vietnam, for example will have to play both sides. australia needs to pay close attention to china. the us conference of catholic bishops has issued a formal apology, for the church's role in mistreatment and trauma inflicted on native american communities. from 1819 to 1969, a us government programme of forced assimilation saw hundreds of thousands of indigenous american children taken from their families and sent to boarding schools, dozens of which were run by the catholic church. survivors have reported mental, physical and sexual abuse. in a document released on friday, the us conference of catholic bishops acknowledged the harm the church caused to native americans, writing "the family systems of many indigenous people never fully recovered from these tragedies, which often led to broken homes harmed by addiction, domestic abuse, abandonment and neglect". well, for more, i spoke to christine diindiisi mccleave, former ceo of the national native american boarding school healing coalition. christine, thank you for taking the time to be with us here in bbc news. you are the descendent of boarding school survivors. what is this apology from the us conference of catholic bishops you? —— what does this apology. it is an acknowledgement that it is a long time coming, but frankly doesn't mean anything without any actions behind it. in terms of those actions, what is it you would like to see? i think that there needs to be a true acknowledgement of the harms that were done. i briefly read through the document and a lot of what they are talking about is the doctrine of discovery, spanish conquistador is, and there is no acknowledgement of the real abuses that happened in catholic boarding schools. —— conquistadores. that is a lack of accountability and a lack of true justice. of accountability and a lack of truejustice. it of accountability and a lack of true justice.— truejustice. it can be difficult _ truejustice. it can be difficult to _ truejustice. it can be difficult to talk - truejustice. it can be difficult to talk about | true justice. it can be - difficult to talk about some of those abuses, but if you don't mind, could you tell us about what members of your family, other people in the community, have had to endure? yes other people in the community, have had to endure?— have had to endure? yes i have heard many _ have had to endure? yes i have heard many boarding _ have had to endure? yes i have heard many boarding school- heard many boarding school survivors stories and my grandfather, who went to a catholic indian boarding school, was subjected to something that is pretty common from survivors to talk about, called the beltline, where they had to run down of the middle of two rows of students holding belts. those students were forced to hit the child running down the middle with their belts and my grandfather was subjected to that same punishment. i subjected to that same punishment. subjected to that same unishment. , ., punishment. i understand there is also concern, _ punishment. i understand there is also concern, concern - punishment. i understand there is also concern, concern has - is also concern, concern has been raised about sexual abuse, also, going on, in these boarding schools. is that something you have heard about, talking to people in the community? talking to people in the communi ? ~ , g community? absolutely. my grandfather _ community? absolutely. my grandfather really _ community? absolutely. my grandfather really didn't - community? absolutely. my. grandfather really didn't want to talk about boarding schools and what happened to him there. so i don't know if he experienced sexual abuse, but i have certainly heard many boarding school survivors talk about that and, frankly it seemed more significant, more prolific, within these boarding schools that were run by the catholic churches and other churches. catholic churches and other churches— catholic churches and other churches. you said that this acknowledgement, - churches. you said that this acknowledgement, it - churches. you said that this. acknowledgement, it doesn't churches. you said that this - acknowledgement, it doesn't go far enough, and you would also like to see further actions. tell us more about what accountability would look like in your mind. i accountability would look like in your mind.— in your mind. i think in terms ofthe in your mind. i think in terms of the catholic _ in your mind. i think in terms of the catholic church - in your mind. i think in terms| of the catholic church holding itself accountable, that is difficult. there is a way in which they can participate in true justice. which they can participate in truejusti