nigel for roger reacts in moments. plus as sex traffickers, other criminals exporting our southern border, senator josh hawley is calling for hearings and a lot more. he's here in raymond arroyo has a question. why isn't the debate over the 25th amendment ever brought up for biden? hill tell us in seen and unseen, but first, the ultimate privilege, that's the focus of tonight's angle. critical race theory m of age on college campuses in the 1970s and that's where we got the term "white privilege" to explain any negative trend or scenario playing out in black america. it goes like this. even if you're a poor white kid living in, let's say, a trailer in arkansas struggling in a dysfunctional family, you are still benefiting from your skin color. you thus have a moral obligation to devote your life to overcoming your privilege and even then, you're never going to be cured from your inherent bias. it's like a religion where there's original sin, but no hope of redemption. >> white privilege is the automatic taken for granted advantage bestowed upon white people as a result of living in a society based on the premise of white as the human ideal. >> critical for white people, for people in general to stop denying their racist idea, to stop denying the ways in which policies have benefited them. stop denying their racism. >> laura: but now this warped mind-set isn't just limited to college seminars. it's infecting everyday life. now, why? because in corporate america these days, victimhood is extremely lucrative. diversity and equity consultants pull down six-figure salaries. blm raked in more than $90 million last year. hollywood, they are pledging more funding for inclusivity in films and tv, which just means that skin color and gender trump talent and skill. meanwhile, traditionalists, they are seen as enemies who need to be driven out of society and shamed. so there is a privilege dominating society today. it props up certain americans and punishes others. but it's not grounded in race. it's elite privilege where liberal elites reward and protect other liberal elites where professed victimhood" left-wing political status guarantee permanent protection, big payouts, or both. now, we've had a lot of recent examples of this type of privilege. hunter biden 'his new book deal, kamala harris' stepdaughter and niece getting really big time modeling gigs and if you criticize, by the way, any of them for reaping these overlords, you are viciously attacked by their fellow privileged elites. so i wasn't at all surprised to watch the duchess of sussex chatting with her neighbor oprah about how unfair life is. what better way to guarantee a permanent number ship in the club of liberal privilege then a generic charge of racism against the monarchy no less? now, when someone dares to speak their truth in response to that suppose a truth or even heaven forbid criticize the supposed victim, they are pilloried. such was the fate of good morning britten's piers morgan, who was unrepentant after leaving the show he coanchored. >> i believe in freedom of speech. i believe in the right to be allowed to have an opinion. if people want to believe meghan markle, that's entirely their rights. i don't believe almost anything that comes out of her mouth, so if i have to fall on my sword for expressing and honestly held opinion, that diatribe to be 29 she came so be it. >> laura: he may be blustery at times and blunt, but he should be free to express his own views. but my friends, those days are past. by saying what half the world is thinking, that megan is a spoiled, entitled brat, he became the elite's enemy number one. so he was canceled. but at least in australia they still have a semblance of free expression left over at sky news. >> she said there were concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be, condemn everyone, name no one, the tactic of an unworthy person. prince harry it would appear is long gone, captured by the untruths spread by miss markel in the victimhood she professes to endure. and what of the royal wedding we are all sucked in to watch? now learn the two were actually wetted in a private ceremony three days before the televised event. that about sums it up, doesn't it? the wedding was a fake. the lady is a fake. >> laura: part of a great agony stem from the fact that her son archie wasn't going to be given a title or palace security. she implies it was based on race, some kind of racist plot and oprah of course didn't challenge her body a posture of his claim because elites don't challenge other members of the club. the truth gets lost until someone honest dates it. >> a granddaughter of the queen. that's the name, zara phillips, the brother, peter phillips played rugby for scotland. no titles. they weren't seeking -- normal decent, polite and achieving. >> laura: the daughters and son of princess anne. didn't get titles, and didn't get security and didn't complain. but in the world of elite privilege of course achievement is secondary. it's secondary to cash. you know, you don't need talent or hard work. political loyalty, phony victimhood and connection is what really matters. actual discrimination is pernicious and evil. we all know that. but this entire racket cynically uses claims of discrimination to reward members of the club and diminishes all of it. elite privilege is poisoning america. it's sabotaging our sense of fairness. a sense of entitlement without an accomplishment, it's paralyzing otherwise-same people into silence. we see this in the reporting of barry white, who recently resigned from "the new york times" after she said she was bullied by colleagues for not being a hard leftist. now, in a fascinating city journal piece, which you should all read in its entirety, she describes the perversion of education at the hands of leftist ideologues. and she says that parents sometimes to object to all of this meet in secret and they are like soviet era dissidents. these are the rebels, well off l.a. parents who send their children to harvard westlake, the most prestigious private school in the city. there are many more to afraid to speak up. they worry about losing their jobs or hurting their kids if their opposition to this ideology were known. the school can ask you to leave for any reason, said one mother at brentwood. another los angeles prep school. then you'll be blacklisted from all the private schools and shall be known as a racist, which is worse than being called a murderer. even democrats are at risk, by the way, unless they are buying into all this nonsense 100%. so it's go woke or go broke. and it's turning kids into nervous wrecks. for them it's not just a fear of getting a bad grade or being turned down for a college recommendation, it's the fear of social shaming. if you publish my name, it would ruin my life, people would attack me for even questioning this ideology. i don't even want people to know i'm a capitalist, a student at the fields in school in new york city told me. the kids are scared of other kids, says one harvard westlake mother. these children, even if they are well-off kids, are closer to being victims than megan marker will ever be. -- meghan markle will ever be. they know that one wrong word can have devastating consequences. but markle is a liberal feminist with a long record of trashing donald trump and she's friends with oprah. she's in the club. so she can speak her mind, even to fame her husband's royal heritage, and if anyone like piers morgan calls her out, she cries foul. new reports reveal that markle has filed a formal complaint against him. elites like markle, they love the idea of regulating other people's speech, just not their own. the former royals are just byproducts though of the twisted world of elite privilege. i actually feel sorry for them. imagine getting netflix and spotify deals reportedly worth more than $100 million just because you turn your back on your family and then claim victim status on the way out the door. that's just really embarrassing and that's the angle. joining me now is nigel farage, former u.k. brexit party leader. nigel, look, hurling unsubstantiated claims of racism on national tv at your royal in-laws and then getting your critics canceled, is this not the ultimate privilege? >> oh, yes, it certainly is and you know, she married into the royal family, i think it was clear from day one what her intentions were. she was very interesting. at that wedding three years ago which fox news covered so well, oprah winfrey was aghast at the wedding despite the fact meghan markle at only met her once before, so i think their intentions were clear. to accuse the royal family, to accuse the queen, effectively, who next year will have reigned 70 years, but not just over the u.k., she's the head of the commonwealth, over 50 countries, 2.3 billion people, the vast majority of whom are asian or black, our royal family has done a huge amount to people of color all over the world. that was unsubstantiated. much else of what she said was simply untrue. her grandson, they wouldn't give poor little archie a prince dumb but a great-grandchild of the mother does not get one of those titles. it was a false claim. prince harry said my father cut me off eventually, but only when they left the u.k., given up there royalty on going to the west coast, so the whole thing, the whole thing was a fabrication. it was with meghan markle and acting performance to emote, to plead with people that she had victim status and also of course to say that she suffered badly from mental health problems and thought perhaps about taking her home life. all i can say is that young woman the other night didn't appear to me to have any mental health problems, but it is shocking that if you attack somebody who claims they got a mental health problem, you are suddenly the villain. i don't want to underplay the importance of mental health, but people using it as an excuse to -- >> laura: bottom line -- enemy to cut you -- but you can't claim racism generally, not name anybody, and then just kind of go like this and say thanks, oprah, for the interview. you cannot do that. but she did it and she got away with it because she's an elite club. they cover for each other, they protect one another and then they signed lucrative deals and then we are supposed to, you know, why all the way to the bank for them? it's just ridiculous and it's demeaning to true discrimination and hardship of all these people suffering around the world and here in the united states. i just -- it doesn't sit well i think with a lot of folks who want them to have great lives and be happy. it doesn't sit well with folks i don't think but you're not going to be surprised, nigel, that hillary clinton weighed in on the big drama. >> the british tabloids, their cruelty in going after megan was just outrageous. this is 2021 and she wanted to live her life. it was heartbreaking to see the two of them sitting there having to describe how difficult it was to be accepted. >> laura: nigel, considering how the british press treats you, should we expect to see you sitting down with oprah sometime soon? you'll be given the same treatment, right? how did you feel, nigel, when they attacked you? how did you feel when i called you -- >> i've been called all the names under the sun, but i challenged the establishment. megan arrived in the u.k., had a fairy tale wedding, the press were gushing with praise about her. i tell you when the criticism started. it started when she and harry started lecturing us on carbon emissions and climate change yet flying around the world in private jets. and frankly, you know what the british press are light, the printed press, everybody in public life gets a tough time in the u.k. nobody is tough as me, but everybody gets a tough time. and again, hillary clinton saying all she wanted to do was live her life. no! she married into the royal family. she married into what we call the firm. she married into a job. >> laura: and she knew what she was getting into, and she should have googled how to curtsy or at least learned that an acting school. nigel, thanks so much. the idea that the u.k. government through an agency called off, can investigate and intimidate tv presenters for merely expressing opinions? that's terrifying. it was even more terrifying is that the american left is absolutely envious of wielding this kind of power. now, this isn't speculation. just last month, house democrats featured a so-called journalism professor spouting anti-american nonsense. >> i think you apply some pressure hopefully to the companies to allow much greater auditing, what public broadcasting is in the digital age, [indiscernible] media elite and the technology elite to actually kind of do the right thing. >> laura: joining me now is missouri senator josh hawley. senator, the right is mocked -- mocked for being concerned about this, but this is crazy. i mean, there is clearly a desire on the part of the so-called liberal elite class to regulate speech and demonize those with whom they disagree. >> and they have the ability to do it now. you look at our country, we don't have the regulatory body they have in the u.k. but we have big tech and it's the same thing. i mean, big tech is in league with the liberals, with the democrats. it's the big tech-big governor alliance. they basically do whatever the liberals want. in some ways it's even more efficient because it's the private sector, but you see tech bending to the will of their liberal masters in washington. they censored the sitting president of the united states just a few weeks ago, so that is -- donald trump, that is, so that is what tech is doing and they are doing every thing that the u.k. regulatory authority is. this new age of censorship is upon us. >> laura: they used to make fun of my old book "shut up and sing," how could you say shut up and sing but they are literally canceling the former president of the united states on one of the biggest social media platforms in the world. i mean, we forget about that. i mean, may not like them but the fact that the former president still cannot post on twitter? it's shameful. >> and he was the sitting president at the time. i mean, at the time, twitter, facebook, instagram, all these platforms, the sitting president of united states and as you say, laura, if extended their ban and have done that to many other conservatives, whether they are throttling down the circulation of their post with their stories new stories for journalists, "the new york post" of course or whether it's just outright d platforming them and this goes back to the left loves the big corporations. the left loves big tech. they love this corporate power. they love it because they can control it. this is the big story of our time, that the left and the corporate -- the big corporate power are in league together and that's how they intend to basically exert social control over the country and this is why conservatives have to stand up and say first of all, we are not going to roll over and let you destroy the first amendment and secondly, whatever happened to free and fair competition in tech and every other sector? and this is why we need to break these businesses up. >> laura: it should have been done when the republicans had the house in the senate but they were all married to big tech as well, or hoping to be buried senator, today wrote a letter to president biden saying in part that there's a crisis on the southern border, full-blown emergency. i urge you to immediately send the department of dhs secretary to congress to testify to the senate homeland security governmental affairs committee. senator, what do you expect to get from him? is obviously in an agreement that this is an evolving situation to challenge, but it's not a crisis. >> we can't use the word crisis. they triple this month laura, then it was a year ago. triple. there's been a big change between last year and this year and that change is joe biden what we are seeing is this administration's policies are acting as a magnet and they are creating a full-blown humanitarian crisis at the border. trafficking is up through the roof. it is through the roof, the exportation of children in this it administration is doing nothing. there will looking the other way on the president, he won't even have a news conference. he won't answer any questions at all. the least he can do is actually sent his administration chief to capitol hill and make them answer questions. what are they going to do about this crisis and just looking the other way is not a policy. >> laura: you've been watching president biden over the last few weeks. are you concerned about his mental competence and watching the way he's dealing with reporters are not dealing with them? >> i'm really concerned abut the fact that he won't answer questions. i just think it is bizarre -- >> laura: just looking at them, senator. you've been around all the people, we all have been. we've all had aging parents, are you concerned? >> i think that the facts, laura, that this is a guy who is the president of the united states and he apparently cannot have a single media availability where he is not staffed with handlers who will let him answer a single unplanned question and let alone to actually have a real press conference, that is very telling and it's very concerning and it extends all the way through their administration. i'm concerned about their policy direction, i'm concerned with are doing at the border and i'm concerned about his ability to answer questions and provide leadership. it's time for him to answer some tough questions and actually show he's ready to do this job and take care of the border among many other things. >> laura: senator, thank you, great to see you. the biden ministrations border cover-up continues to blow up in their faces. so they keep trotting out new faces to prop up the lie. up next, the fiery debate about why the biden administration is failing. to meet the world's needs while creating a cleaner future for all. at chevron, we're lowering the carbon emissions intensity of our operations, investing in lower-carbon technologies, and exploring renewable fuels of the future. we work hard to care for the homes we love. but it's only human... to protect the one we share. this isn't just freight. we work hard to care these aren't just shipments. they're promises. promises of all shapes and sizes. each with a time and a place they've been promised to be. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you. oh, you think this is just a community center? no. it's way more than that. cause when you hook our community up with the internet... boom! look at ariana, crushing virtual class. jamol, chasing that college dream. michael, doing something crazy. this is the place where we can show the world what we can do. comcast is partnering with 1000 community centers to create wifi-enabled lift zones, so students from low-income families can get the tools they need to be ready for anything. oh we're ready. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> laura: biden's border cover-up is falling apart faster than you can say daca so in today's briefing they brought out a new spin doctor, roberta jacobson. first she tried to blame the mess on the trump administration. >> president biden has made clear from day one that he wants to change our immigration system. doing so means truly building back better because we can't just undo four years of the previous administration's actions overnight. >> laura: oh, my god. there's that phrase again. but the excuses didn't stop there. she picked up right where jen psaki left off yesterday. >> we know how to get money to communities that are most likely to send migrants, but that are also suffering the greatest effect of two hurricanes. >> laura: you got it? hur