>> welcome to hannity and tonight many americans long suffering from trump arrangement syndrome are downright giddy. yesterday's verdict is not a cure for their disease. in fact the trump campaign i will argue tonight is stronger than ever. after the verdict of former president's campaign said it raised what's a massive record $34.8 million in just 6 hours. by the way that includes their site crashing. 1 flash poll showing donald trump with 6-point bump in the former president himself is more determined than ever to save our country from political law fair. watch this. >> this is a case where if they can do this to me they can do this to anyone. these are bad people. we were not allowed to use our election expert under any circumstances. you saw what happened to some of the witnesses that were on our side. they were literally crucified. i don't mind being out there because i'm doing something for this country and i'm doing something for our constitution. it's very important. far beyond me. this can't be allowed to happen to other presidents. it should never be allowed to happen and it all comes out of the white house. crooked joe biden the worst president in history of our country. he's the worst president in history of our country. the most incompetent. he is the dumbest president we've ever had. he's the dumbest president, most incompetent president and he's the most dishonest president we've ever had. the only way they think they can win this election is by doing exactly what they are doing right now, win in the courts because they can't at the ballot box. so we are going to show them that we are going to fight because i'm willing to do whatever i have to do to save our country and our constitution. i don't mind. [ cheering and applause ] >> honoured to do it for our country and our constitution and he's willing to do it. donald trump doesn't need this. but he's right. what happened yesterday was not justice. i said from day 1 he cannot get a fair trial in new york. he didn't get a fair trial in new york. and mar-a-lago is not worth $18 million. this was a result of our reckless dangerous irresponsible show trial shedding the constitution, shedding the rule of law all in an effort to weaponize our justice system. this is what a dual justice system looks like. but today we heard a much different message from your current president joey who praised america's justice system. take a look. >> the american printable that no 1 is above the law was reaffirmed. donald trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. it was a state case not a federal case. and it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 americans, 12 people like you it was reckless tickets dangerous and it's irresponsible. for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. our justice system has injured for nearly 250 years. and it literally is the cornerstone of america. our justice system. the justice system should be respected. >> what is reckless dangerous irresponsible is the weaponization of his justice department and to allow this to happen. all the details we've been giving you and all the legal experts have been giving over the many weeks of this trial that it's going on. donald trump was tried on a novel legal theory by an ada who by the way campaigned on his ability to get trump, really? you have to be kidding me during a trial overseen by a partisan biden donating judge convicted after just a few hours of deliberations by a jury of ms d&c fans selected from a district that voted what 90% for joe biden. this is a headline from the very liberal new york magazine called prosecutors got trump but they contorted the law. that article written by fake news cnn senior legal analysts even a blind squirrel gets the net. and hero quote the charges against trump are obscure and nearly entirely unprecedented. then he said no state prosecutor in new york or wyoming or anywhere has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime against anyone for anything, none ever democratic prosecutors in the state of new york city of new york including former top official the third top official of joe biden's own doj along with this radical democratic judge twisted the law into a pretzel in order to convict the leading republican presidential candidate in the middle of an election. so you're not going to hear any complaints from joe biden or any other democrat or their allies in the media mob tell americans no 1 is above the law. will of course they are not going to. there are notable few exceptions including what biden himself, really? okay. now special council recently declined to charge president biden with mishandling classified documents. his 4 locations never got rated. his home never got rated despite ample evidence of criminal must conduct over multiple decades. they concluded well he's probably a nice old man who's going to come off nice to a jury and he just going to seem forgetful so we will not prosecute him. why didn't they raid his house. why didn't they raid hillary clinton's house? the exact same allegations. donald trump is currently awaiting a criminal trial for the mishandling of classified documents over a few months? hillary clinton also above the law like joe. in 2016 james comey the july 2016 press conference what did she do? she mishandled top-secret classified documents on her servers. illicit private servers she never should have had. infamously saying no reasonable prosecutor whatever prosecute. hillary clinton during an election. according to james comey. but that's not all. after hillary clinton and the dnc were katniss labelling payments for that dirty disinformation russian dossier a legal expense. it was funnelled through a law firm that hired an op research firm that hired christopher steele that led to a dirty russian disinformation dossier that resulted in not 1 but 4 separate warrants issued, 3 signed by james comey himself. no criminal charges ever brought. both clinton the dnc they were allowed to settle the matter quietly but the simple find for the fec that said in this case has been allowed to testify no crime was committed. no violation was committed. keep in mind trump was convicted of 34 felonies for allegedly mislabelling a payment to a lawyer as a legal expense. but we can right the ship. you have the power the ultimate verdict lies with you. donald trump can finish what he started in 2016. that's when trump destroyed hillary clinton at the ballot box. today she's still deeply unhappy and bitter. instead of serving as the president of this country hillary now is selling mugs on instagram. in 2016 the us justice system never held her accountable. the american people did. initiator you have an opportunity to render the final verdict at the ballot box. that's the only verdict that will ultimately matter. it with reaction president trump's attorney in this case. he argued the case todd blanche is with us. you ever see a case like this in your life? >> never. of course not. neither has anybody else. i don't stand alone. i've practised law in york for 15 years. and nobody has ever seen a case like this before. and hopefully nobody ever will again. >> hopefully they will never again. let's talk a little bit about what your expectations were. i've gone through the list. you have a biden donor judge in the family conflicts. you have a da that ran on a get trump campaign. mar-a-lago is still i guess valued at $18 million a according to judge her again when it's closer to billion. but more importantly legal theory and then the broad latitude given to the defence and closing arguments to make statements that are factually inaccurate to the jury over and over again. you would object. that would be overruled. and then the judge himself a novel legal concept that goes against not 1 but 2 separate supreme court decisions. that's a short list todd blanche. i want you to respond to all of it. >> we knew this was a problem the day the indictment was handed down so it was not april 15th we realized we were up against a battle that would be virtually impossible to win that happened year ago. we've been fighting this case for over a year with the judge and district attorney trying to understand what the charges were in the underlying crimes, and we got no answer. really got no answer until the trial started. think about that. and it turns out the crime that was charged the original crime is a misdemeanour. bumped up to a felony if it supposed to cover up another crime. the other crime being covered up was another misdemeanour. another misdemeanour, state law election violation that required unlawful means and that's where they decided he's federal election law tax law and another false records filing completely for sure completely confusing the jury and confusing everybody. so this was a fight for the past year and a half with this system and this judge and we new going in that we would have a really tough road and we did have a really tough road. and the person that comes up on top in my mind without a doubt is president trump. you saw that last night. you saw that today in his press conference where he told the american people exactly what he thought happened and exactly what he would do today and tomorrow and we are going to fight. look this case is right for appeal. i did not want to have to appeal this case. i wanted to win it at trial and we didn't. but this case we are going to appeal it and i fully expect will be fully exonerated on appeal. >> sean: let's talk about the appeal and next steps. obviously can you get an expedited appeal considering the circumstances under which the severity of violations constitutional violations? what do you expect his next step? >> we hope to get an expedited appeal. the next step is a sentencing on june 11th i. 11th, and our goal is quite simple. and that's to keep the leading candidate for president of united states out of prison. that's what we are going to try to do and he should go to prison. putting aside the fact the law suggests some buddy like him should never go to prison for this crime. he was a president of the united states, and he under no circumstances should spend a day in prison and that's what we're going to be asking the judge to do is not sentence him to prison but no matter the sentence whatever it is we will immediately appeal we have all kind of stuff to appeal. this was a novel case. the district attorney said yesterday and said he year ago this is the bread-and-butter. this is what they always do. that's not true. that's just not a true statement. there's not a single case anybody has shown me in a year that's anything like the case this district attorney brought. you're talking communications that took place in the year of our lord 2015, 2016 records from 2017 on president trump's personal accounts while he was in the white house. running this country is the leader of the free world. that's not a normal case. that's not bread-and-butter. let me ask you this. you talked about july 11th. by the way ironically 4 days before the republican convention some buddy classy felonies, somebody with no prior history of any conviction of any kind former president in the middle of a campaign you would think a judge would released him on his own recognizance. he certainly not a flight risk. he's got secret service around him. and pending appeal. nothing about this judge would surprise me. is he going to give home confinement, will he'd airport donald trump in jail? any thoughts about where this is heading? >> look i hope and i'm going to spend the next everyday until july 11th working to make sure there's no jail sentence. i don't what judge mark schaan will do. i think he knows he's been a judge for a long time. he knows the law and i hope he sentences appropriately but no matter the sentence we hope but stayed for sure pending appeal. because it's not even all the judge mark schaan. its district attorney that brought this case and there's a lot of things that need to be appealed. >> last question you go to the appellate court the supreme court both. >> we are not going to stop fighting. everybody is talking on your show and other shows about going right to the supreme court. we are doing whatever we can. if that means we're going to the first department in new york court of appeals and spring court will go right to the supreme court. we'll do whatever we can. there's no option we are slamming the door on. this has been a travesty of justice for over a year and a half. he said this before but it's worth just before we go this investigation was open. this grand jury was started. less than 2 months after president trump announced he's running for reelection. right after he announces running for election alvin bragg's prosecutors called the strict americans at hake we have the most incriminating evidence that you have from your case? and then they indicted shortly thereafter. that's a fact. >> and you didn't even know the charge, i don't even know if you until this day know what the real charge is. we'll never know. clear constitutional violation. todd blanche thank you. will be watching closely. here with reaction george washington university law professor and fox news contributor jonathan turley. a lot of what i brought up with todd are things that we have gone into great detail on. what was your reaction to what he said? >> obviously they are hard at work. they have to explore their options. i'm a little sceptical about trying to leapfrog to the supreme court. the supreme court just turned down an effort by special counsel max smith expedite his cases. i doubt they are going to want to do that for former president trump. so they are likely to have to go through the state system but this is a target rich environment for appeal. i know that there's been great celebration in manhattan. this is something of a thrill kill connection. but that may not last long. under review. if the new york courts don't reverse this i expect the federal system will. there are layers of reversible error here by judge mark schaan. >> professor i know you worked hard all week. thank you for sharing your time with us. we appreciate it and go now to the author of the book get trump. harvard law professor alan dershowitz fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett is with us. let me start with you. let me start with the question of what is next. what should be next? if you are advising the trump legal team what would you advise them? what would be the next steps as we head into this july 11th sentencing? >> i think you have to look twin appeal. higher court judges in new york just like juan merchan. this is a liberal politically driven club who protect the room. i'm not optimistic the former president's chances to overturn the conviction which means trump's only real relief is in the federal courts. but that's the proper venue anyway because as jonathan pointed out most of the egregious violations by the judge were constitutional due process rights for example refusing to tell the defendant what this conspiracy crime was. and we still don't know. that's a clear violation of the sixth eminent. and then of course telling the jury to forget all about unanimity. that's a bedrock constitutional right derived from the sixth and seventh eminent. judge merchan made a mockery of that as well as justice with a multitude of reversible errors that are quite shocking to everyone. and it's not, it is the federal court is not state courts that they are the ones who tend to scrupulously guard our due process rights hexo there may be a dual track here. you've got to go through the state system. maybe we'll get lucky and some judges with a conscience who were schooled in the law will look at this and say this is fundamentally wrong we reverse. but i think in the end it will be the federal courts maybe even the supreme court that corrects this incredible justice. >> let's get your take professor what were the next steps before you if you're talking to president trump's attorney? >> i would do something quite radical. i would move immediately for the sentencing to occur next week not july 11th. so you can get the appeal going. you cannot appeal until there is a sentence. of the court refused to expedite the sentencing i would try to take the case now immediately to the new york court of appeals skipping the intermediate court of appeals which is a political court act manhattan-based democrats largely. i would try to go right to the court of appeals and ask them for decision within 30 days in order to get to the supreme court before the election. there's no reason to have the sentencing delayed until july 11th. the judge knows what he's going to do today. >> sean: why would you have any confidence judge merchan would expedite the sentencing? to me i think the obvious thing to do if it was him would be your released on your own recognizance pending appeal. i don't have faith you will do that. >> that's not the point. the point is to impose the sentence now so there can be an appeal. of the judge refuses as he would take the case to the court of appeals, and say, your honor,'s, we want the sentencing to be done now so we can appeal. if the judge refuses to allow the sentencing to impose let us appeal now. we will not appeal necessarily the sentencing. we will appeal the conviction. i will do everything to expedite this. timing is everything. >> very dangerous times for constitutional republic. very dangerous. thank you both. funding on fox nation with you yesterday. thank you. when we come back laura trump is here. she will react to the biden campaign reportedly celebrating trump's guilty verdict and judge dineen. orca straight ahead. ♪ my back got injured very bad. i was off work for about a year. i heard about relief factor from my wife... i took it every day, three times a day, for three weeks. ...look at her and i said, "the pain is gone." and she said, "i'm glad it helped." i said, "no, you don't understand. it's gone." you, too, can feel better every day with relief factor, a daily supplement that fights pain naturally. call or go online now and get 35% off your first order. [ ♪♪ ] >> sean: this is fox news update on kevin corke in washington. president biden says he backs israel's new cease-fire and hostage lease proposal. i deleted the agreement would unfold in 3 phases beginning with 6 week long cease-fire. biden urging hamas to come to the table and accept the deals so the work and finally end. president also says if the cease-fire holds a major reconstruction plan for gaza would begin. this comes as israel's military confirms forces have moved into central rough up. more than a million palestinians have fled the southern gaza city since the assault began. and mike tyson's highly anticipated fight with jake paul has been postponed. the 57-year-old falling ill last week. his camp says it's an officer. doctors advising him to lay off the heavy training for a few weeks. i'm kevin corke in washington. now back to hannity. earlier today nsa reminder president biden offered first public comments on donald trump's conviction. let's take a look. >> donald trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. it was a stayed case not a federal case. it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens, 12 americans 12 people like you. now given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has the opportunity. that's how american system of justice works. and it's reckless. it's dangerous and irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. >> can you tell us donald trump refers to himself as a political prisoner and planes you directly. what's your response to that? do you think you will have an impact on the campaign? we would love to hear your thoughts. >> should he be on the ballot? >> he didn't have permission to