Stay updated with breaking news from Question subject. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
that these cases won't get to trial that it is too late. forget it. everything is about what voters do. and that's very true in a sense. voters will ultimately make a decision on trump's fitness to serve. but if trump is not elected, these cases will go to trial shortly after the first of the year. and that is one way of bringing this situation to a close and seeking justice. >> that is the intention of my question. we shouldn't dismiss these cases as wiped away in november because if joe biden wins, donald trump is going to trial more than once. joyce vance, thank you for making the time. great to see you. >> thanks. still to come this evening, have is a thing senate republicans really, really, really do not want to get on the record about. and today's senate democrats forced their hand. we will ex-plain coming up. and house speaker mike johnson is using the war in gaza against democrats. we'll have more on that coming
minimum wage law.wage so i also wonder, when he talks about how they have all of these great companies headquartered there, that coul.d be true. how many of them are living a there and working there?ht b they might be headquartered there but how many of those people are allowed to work andst live someplace else that's less expensive like idaho and montano and colorado, did you know what i'm talking about, denver.ve f >> jesse: they might have facebook for their lost rubio's. >> dana: and that's where everybody eight.ever >> he's right, they do have more fortune 500 companies.s. not a surprise he's talkingom about something positive.yw they areoo home to some of the best farming in america that giving us some of the greatest wine, home to a lot of importedo defense and aerospace infrastructure, not to mention silicon valley itself. i get what he's break -- bragging. do they have problems? without question. does florida have problems? without question. texas, new york, tennessee. but ift i were him i would be
republicans. is every house committee rolled by americans using its subpoena power in every way it needs to right now with every republican da? >> we need some brave district attorneys in the united states to step forward and take action. >> they need to be put on defense. hit them with a blow torch. >> it's a terrible precedent for the country. does that mean the next president does it to them? that's the question. it is a terrible, terrible path they are leading us to and it is very possible that it will have to happen to them. >> joining me now is massachusetts senator, democrat, elizabeth warren. senator warren, thank you so much for being here. i remember a time when marco rubio, your colleague in the senate, had at least a residence on earth one where facts are facts and reality is reality. i have to get your thoughts on
today, revamped the timetable, pushing a number of pretrial hearings later. she did this less than a day after announcing a june 21 hearing on a defense request to declare special counsel jack smith's appointment illegitimate hearing to which people who are not party to the case are invited to take part. then in georgia, the other shoe drop to state appeals court put fulton county district attorney fani willis is case against the former president isn't an on-hold indefinitely. meanwhile, the president, the former president, is talking retribution. here he is last evening on newsmax floating the idea of using the criminal justice system if reelected again does that mean the next president does it to them? that's really the question. it's terrible, terrible past that they're leading us to and it's very possible that it's going to have to happen to them. >> it's going to have to happen to them very possible. we'll talk about that tonight first though, how today provided
like, i mean other than just saying like this is just well, this is this is a question if she does find despite the fact that in the paul manafort and andrew miller attacks on robert malek hunter biden just tried throwing out those ventral counsel if she flies in the face of all precedent and says either under the appointments clause of the constitution or the appropriations clause of the constitution. >> that the appointment of jack smith was invalid? yes. there's recourse up to the 11th circuit. part of the reason i think in trying to understand her mentality, she seems so scared to make a decision that she scheduled over a day of argument on these ludicrous motions if she knocked smith out, that can go up to the 11th circuit and she can be removed by the 11th circuit. that's why she's being so careful, so slow, she
really voting for donald trump? i don't think any of those people would have voted for hillary clinton, but it helped them along. and the second thing was that mike pence understood and knew the ev angelico world. he knew how to how to communicate with angelica leaders and how to sell the administration's agenda to them. i don't think that'll trump needs that anymore. i think instead, he goes directly to his base. they hear from him and they respond to him and the ev a gel-like leaders then hear from the base not the other way around is there room for growth among evangelicals for donald trump, i mean, not i mean, he has white evangelicals what about others? well, i think the key question this year is going to be that of hispanic, of angelic goals. journalist harvest proved has a major, a story coming out in christianity today in a few weeks about this question of what does it look like with hispanic ev angelic goals and will be the swing vote and i think that very well
very pleased she has a brand of weed named after her, despite her prosecution of those holding weed. >> greg: poter who knew intervig ditzy women bouncing on trampolines would be a good ideu because this was a lateral move from that. this interview had more softballs than a lesbian picnice nevermind there weren't any real questions about the borders, are you worried about joe's health, you are next in line. did he did not even ask for the most important question, what thehell hell do you do all day? because that's what everybody wants to know. i don't think this helped herd but it's actually not about the liberalism of jimmy kimmel, it's that he's not that smart. that made him a pushover forover this buzzed buffoon that is our vp. i'm surprised he did not wheel out the trampoline for old time
crack. he was super charming. everybody loved him. she testified that she saw hunter doing drugs as late as mid september 2018, several weeks before he bought the gun at the heart of the case, but under cross-examination, she said she had no idea what hunter was doing, which means september and november, which covers the month hunter both the firearm, gordon cleveland, the gunshot employee who sold hunter biden the gun, took the stand next and testified how hunter came into the store looking for firearm. he testified that he told hunter to read the atf background form carefully and saw him check no. next so the question about whether he was an addict or used illegal drugs, the alleged lie at the center of the case on cross-examination, abbe lowell, one of hunter is defense attorneys and got that employee to admit that he is a quote, whale hunter, someone who upsells customer summers to buy more expensive guns, and that contradicts the grand jury testimony that employee gave. so clearly, it points scored by
the aftermath of his brother's death. as her testimony is critical as she discovered the gun in hunter's truck fearing he might use it th kill himself. she disposed o f it in a grocery store trash bin. we also heard from the gun shop employee who sold hunter the pistol. saw the first son answer no tohg the question about drug use on the gun form. that's a summary of today.ay t judge, how did you see of this trial? >> judge jeanine: day three went very well for thepr prosecution.s mo the case is moving quickly, as well it should.s this inos not a complicated cas. tremendous circumstantial evidence and we've gottrem diret testimony comingirec with the girlfriend, an. the shame of this whole thing i that there should have been a plea bargain here.e de but the democrats messed it up because what they tried to do was give him the courthouse and give him immunity for the restfi of his life and so these are the consequences. he has t to o go to trial on th. you've got his own words from f
conviction, now, under new york state law, and federal law, he's a convicted felon, which means it is a state and federal crime for him to possess a firearm or even ammunition. now there's a third gun, anderson that after the nypd received these two they said, where's the third and they said, well, that was legally transferred to florida so we don't know about the third gun. we know the nypd has two, but if if former president trump is still in possession of that third gun, technically, so they've, they've actually taken two of his guns? yes. >> and that that happened when he was charged now, what would have happened was had he been acquitted in the new york state case, he could have applied to get those guns and his carry license back. the real question is about the gun that went to florida. what is the disposition of that weapon? was it turned into authorities? if so when if so, to whom? >> if it wasn't for i mean, if it's in new york license, does