inspired munich, erik ten hag dismissed widely supported suggestions last week that he had a split dressing room. his team were booed off having lost 3—0 last saturday to bournemouth, saying their consistency is down to chopping and changing the season, something which didn't happen last season. ~ �* ., ., .,~ something which didn't happen last season. �* ., ., .,~ ., , season. we've had to make many chances, season. we've had to make many changes. i _ season. we've had to make many changes, i think _ season. we've had to make many changes, i think especially - season. we've had to make many changes, i think especially in - season. we've had to make many changes, i think especially in our| changes, i think especially in our back line. we had a regular formation for a long time, then you get the routines in. so we have to wait for that, and until that moment, we have to deal with it. everything has to do with it. but i'm sure that when we get back to regular basis, then we will play better. ~ �* . ., , ., ., better. we've had many amazing -la ers better. we've had many amazing players over _ better. we've had many amazing players over time, _ better. we've had many amazing players over time, and _ better. we've had many amazing players over time, and now - better. we've had many amazing players over time, and now feell better. we've had many amazing i players over time, and now feel like we are _ players overtime, and now feel like we are at_ players over time, and now feel like we are at a — players over time, and now feel like we are at a stage where we have big characters_ we are at a stage where we have big characters in— we are at a stage where we have big characters in the dressing room where _ characters in the dressing room where it's— characters in the dressing room where it's notjust a case of so many— where it's notjust a case of so many managers where it's been a bit toxic at _ many managers where it's been a bit toxic at times. the boys are fairly behind _ toxic at times. the boys are fairly behind the — toxic at times. the boys are fairly behind the manager, and i said that in many— behind the manager, and i said that in many other interviews, that's the way it— in many other interviews, that's the way it will— in many other interviews, that's the way it will remain to stay. we've -ot way it will remain to stay. we've got an _ way it will remain to stay. we've got an amazing coaching staff, as well, _ got an amazing coaching staff, as welt, so — got an amazing coaching staff, as well, so people can get carried away with what _ well, so people can get carried away with what other players think and what _ with what other players think and what they — with what other players think and what they say behind closed doors, but we _ what they say behind closed doors, but we just — what they say behind closed doors, but we just want to do well for the club and _ but we just want to do well for the club and that's all.— club and that's all. midfielder emile smith _ club and that's all. midfielder emile smith rowe _ club and that's all. midfielder emile smith rowe was - club and that's all. midfielder i emile smith rowe was uploaded club and that's all. midfielder - emile smith rowe was uploaded onto the field by his team—mates after returning earlier than expected from a knee injury sustained in october. having confirmed there place in the knockout stages with a resounding 6-0 knockout stages with a resounding 6—0 win over last, mikael arteta is likely to rotate his team as they take on psv eindhoven. not a huge amount ofjeopardy ahead of the match, psg sit ten points ahead and also confirmed their place in the last 16. a surprise inclusion in england's i6 last 16. a surprise inclusion in england's 16 man squad for their test series in india. there 21—year—old spinner is one of three uncapped players, and despite only making his first debut in the summer, the director of the team says he's keen to develop.- summer, the director of the team says he's keen to develop. every now and auain, says he's keen to develop. every now and again. you _ says he's keen to develop. every now and again. you just — says he's keen to develop. every now and again, you just catch _ says he's keen to develop. every now and again, you just catch a _ says he's keen to develop. every now and again, you just catch a glimpse i and again, you just catch a glimpse of a couple of balls where you think, "hang on, there's something different there." he's raw, he's going for experience as much as anything else, though we won't be afraid to play him if required. and i think this is the start of his journey where we will see hopefully a world—class spitter in the future. to golf, it's been five years coming but louis estes completed a two shot victory to seal his tenth dp world tour title. the 2010 open champion found the water on the 18th but recovered with a monster power pot to take victory in his native south africa, finishing on 18 under, to clear. sunderland's stadium of light has been chosen to host the opening game of the women's rugby world cup in 2025, with former captain sarah hunter missing, its a dream not likely to be missed. hunter bowed out in march after playing 141st test against scotland. she is excited about a new generation being inspired by this new generation. it's a venue of the event, with twickenham being the largest. that's all your support for now, back to you, matthew. rishi sunak has defended his eat out to help out scheme at his inquiry and the handling of the code pandemic. he introduced the measure to encourage restaurant businesses back in 2020 when he was chancellor. scientists previously told the inquiry they had no idea about the scheme until it was actually announced. the prime minister said in the month between the announcement and the start of the announcement and the start of the scheme, no concerns about its safety were raised to him. nick eardley from bbc verify has been looking at the impact of that scheme. , ,, ., ~ looking at the impact of that scheme. , ,, .,~ , scheme. rishi sunak has been defending _ scheme. rishi sunak has been defending the _ scheme. rishi sunak has been defending the eat _ scheme. rishi sunak has been defending the eat out - scheme. rishi sunak has been defending the eat out to - scheme. rishi sunak has been defending the eat out to help| scheme. rishi sunak has been - defending the eat out to help out scheme at the inquiry today, saying it was important for the economy and it was important for the economy and it was, in his view, say. he was asked why he didn't raise the potential risks of the scheme in government meetings. mit? potential risks of the scheme in government meetings.- potential risks of the scheme in government meetings. why but i raise it as a risk when _ government meetings. why but i raise it as a risk when i didn't _ government meetings. why but i raise it as a risk when i didn't believe - it as a risk when i didn't believe that— it as a risk when i didn't believe that it _ it as a risk when i didn't believe that it was? because it was designed in the _ that it was? because it was designed in the context of a savoury opening. the onus _ in the context of a savoury opening. the onus is — in the context of a savoury opening. the onus is really on the people who now believed that it was a risk to have _ now believed that it was a risk to have raised — now believed that it was a risk to have raised at the time when something could've been done about it if they— something could've been done about it if they felt strongly. but something could've been done about it if they felt strongly.— it if they felt strongly. but not eve one it if they felt strongly. but not everyone agrees. _ it if they felt strongly. but not everyone agrees. it's - it if they felt strongly. but not everyone agrees. it's been - it if they felt strongly. but not - everyone agrees. it's been suggested that eat out to help out did help spread the virus at the end of summer 2020. we've been taking a look at the evidence, let's start off with the context— this wasjuly 2020, when the scheme was announced. as you can see, cases are low, around 4300 a week. this is the situation when the scheme began — again, it's pretty low. it's worth remembering though that there was often a delay between infections happening and them showing up in the figures. and look what happened in the next few weeks in september, a significant and noticeable increase. by significant and noticeable increase. by mid—september, they are around 26,000 cases a week. there were a lot of changes happening at the time— schools have gone back, more of the economy had opened up, so you can'tjust of the economy had opened up, so you can't just assume that all this is just because of eat out to help out. and it's also worth remembering when you think about the second locked in 2021, the start of the year, the bigger increases came in december and into january. what can we draw from this? we've heard from some of the experts who were advising the government at the time, they've been giving evidence to the inquiry. we are told that the chief medical officer referred to it as eat out to help out the virus. this isjonathan van tam, he said that this scheme didn't feel very sensible to him. one government adviser even referred to rishi sunak as doctor death. finally, sir patrick vallance, the former chief scientific adviser, was asked whether it was likely that the scheme had contributed to deaths, and this was his answer, that it was highly likely. there has been a study into the impact of eat out to help out by the university of warwick — they think it added around one and six cases, which would be pretty significant. but not everyone is convinced — other experts have said the scheme was unlikely to have had a big impact on how winter 2020 played out, culminating in that second lockdown. let's also have a look at this screen, which shows us what was going on in other european countries. as you can see, france and spain have big increases in the virus, biggerthan and spain have big increases in the virus, bigger than the uk. neither of them had an eat out to help out scheme. there's also the economic argument that rishi sunak has been making at the inquiry today — hospitality was struggling, and to balance the economic problems with health. we can't be certain how many cases were caused simply by eat out to help out. rishi sunak has insisted he thought it was safe — many of the medical experts are convinced that art convinced. about 200 members of afghanistan's special forces, who were trained and funded by the uk to fight for the then—government, are facing imminent deportation back to their taliban—controlled homeland. the figures — gathered by a network of afghan veterans — reveal the scale of what one former uk general called "an absolute betrayal". the soldiers in question fled to pakistan, which now says it will expel what it considers to be afghan refugees. newsnight�*s international correspondentjoe inwood has the story. they were afghanistan's elite, cf333 and atf444, known as the triples. initially set up to tackle the opium trade, they soon became specialists in fighting the taliban. translation: at first we carried out thousands of operations _ to destroy the drugs trade. then after 2007, when the taliban networks gradually started their activities, we carried out operations against them whenever they were. ali spent nearly two decades on front lines. this is him with members british special forces. the triples were at the front end of the uk—supported counter—terrorism operation, they did the most dangerous, the most difficult, the most important missions accompanied by british soldiers and did many things that british soldiers didn't do. now ali is in hiding in pakistan. he shows us around the single room where he and his family have barely left for three months. along with hundreds of his colleagues, ali couldn't get on evacuation flights when the taliban returned, so he headed to pakistan where he assumed he would get help from the uk's afghan relocation and assistance scheme. he was wrong. translation: | have| been so disappointed. i served in different, high—ranking positions and fulfilled my duties honestly. he has twice been rejected on the grounds that he did not work for, or even with, the uk. according to the man who set up the triples, they didn'tjust work with the uk, they were entirely funded by them. so, we had one mission, we and british, and the donor for this mission, these triples, were britain, british government. it was crystal clear. so, 100% we worked together. that work made them fierce enemies of the taliban. for ali and his colleagues, being sent home could be a death sentence. translation: we know of many former soldiers who were recognised _ and have disappeared, almost certainly killed. when iran and pakistan deport people, the taliban have a list in our biometric data. the arap scheme is managed by the uk ministry of defence. in a statement, they said... knocking on door as pakistan seeks to find and deport afghans living there illegally... knocking on door ..ali says time is running out. he hopes the uk will help him before it is too late. joe inwood, bbc news. general sir richard barrons, former commanderjoint force, command says the triples — as the soldiers are known — should be brought to the uk, and all effortd shoud be made to locate the troops. i very much want to believe that it is an oversight that 200 highly skilled afghan soldiers who did some of the most difficult and dangerous missions against the taliban and al-qaeda accompanied and supported by british and other forces, have somehow not been included in the scheme to repatriate those afghans that fought with us back to the uk. but if it is an oversight, it now must be corrected because some will be in afghanistan, some in pakistan. either way, they should all be in the uk along with the others that we made a pledge to repatriate. i'll come to the reasonings in a moment, but basically, you think this is a betrayal, do you? if it was a deliberate decision not to include them in the scheme, and i don't know if that is the case, then that would be a betrayal because these 200 soldiers fought alongside british soldiers during these really difficult missions, and for them not to be repatriated means that if they are sent back to afghanistan or are found in afghanistan, they will be in serious personal jeopardy, be jailed or killed. the ministry of defence must know that, though. so the ministry of defence does know that, and to its credit, the ministry of defence is moving really quickly now to get the people that are in pakistan out before the pakistani deadline, and they have a scheme running to get other people out of afghanistan. the key thing is the triples, the 200 must be part of this scheme, as a top priority, not a bottom priority or no priority at all, and that i think is the issue. the government has talked about having an ambitious and generous commitment. in a sense, that is a general blanket statements to the whole of the issues surrounding people coming out of afghanistan as opposed to a direct response to this. what are your fears here? what is the timeline that you think that they have to actually change this decision? so, the emergency evacuation from kabul is now more than two years ago, so we have had two years of people who fought with us being left behind in afghanistan or in some cases making their way illegally or legally into the country, so there is plenty of time to get these relatively small numbers, i mean, no more than about 7,500 in total back to the united kingdom. so it's taken a long time, and it's going to take a bit longer. this is quite a difficult thing to do. but the country made a commitment. our government made a commitment that those people who fought with us and were therefore in jeopardy because they fought with us, would be brought back to the united kingdom and reset all. —— and resettled. we just need to do that. and it has to be end—to—end. so one end of the scheme is, make sure the right people who are entitled to come back are brought out, and the triples, the 200 need to fall into that. and they need to get to the uk and to be resettled properly and decently — and everybody knows we have a problem with integration, and our local authorities are really struggling to resettle these afghans that we brought back. and for these soldiers, that is no help at all. it has to have an end—to—end assistance. you jump ahead two or three stages as you took us through. so a final thought, if you would — how much danger are they and if they do get sent back to afghanistan? and if they did, personally, how ashamed would you be if that was the conclusion here of what was actually decided? so, if these soldiers were sent back and identified as such, they are in mortal danger because they fought against the hardest taliban targets, and if they were in mortal danger, and they would be, i would be ashamed because we made the right commitment to them, we just proved that we couldn't fulfil our word. three people have been found guilty of the murder of shakira spencer. the 35—year—old was fatally assaulted at a flat in harrow in north west london, in september 2022 — before being moved to her own home in ealing, where her decomposed body was later found. the court heard how ashana studholme, lisa richardson, and shaun pendlebury had systematically abused her in the weeks before her death. our home affairs correspondent, june kelly, reports on the background to the case. i have two lipsticks. shakira spencer with her online make—up lessons. i'll go a bit peachy today. she was a healthy young woman with a partner and two children. she became an emaciated wreck after she lost control of her life. she was starved, fed only sachets of ketchup and treated like a slave. and this was the evil trio responsible. the leader, ashana studholme, herfriend lisa richardson, and her one—time boyfriend shaun pendlebury. ashana studholme is a cool, manipulative, coercive individual. —— cruel. she seems to have a power over people and controls them. ashana studholme had befriended shakira, introducing her to drugs, and then isolating her from the life she had established. her relationship with her partner broke up. studholme's flat in harrow, in north west london was one of the places that she and the other two subjected shakira to a campaign of cruelty and humiliation. they filmed themselves abusing her. over a weekend in september 2022, came theirfinal attack. boiling water was used to injure shakira. a kind of makeshift flame—thrower with a can of aerosol was used to burn her. and then, beatings around the head with what has been described as a kind of heavy massager. ashana studholme and shaun pendlebury then bundled a dying shakira into a car boot and drove her back to her own flat in ealing, in west london. they locked her in a cupboard in the hall. they later returned and moved her to a bottom bunk bed. it's not known whether at this point, she was alive or dead. they left her body to rot and decompose. two weeks later, neighbours saw maggots crawling out from under her front door and called the police. no amount of time that they get would be enough for what they have done. they've taken someone very, very special. what they've done is just disgusting, sickening, to someone who is bubbly and kind, jokey, caring, loving, tojust be taken away for what really? it's heartbreaking. ealing council says it is carrying out a safeguarding adult review into the case of shakira spencer. june kelly, bbc news. we are coming towards the end of today's programme, just time for one more story. hollywood'