mark: hello america, i am mark levin this is "life, liberty & levin". we have a fantastic show tonight. do you want to know why i'm not the host, here's my buddy pete hegseth, what are the nicest, smartest guys i know. every couple of years when i have a book i say why not have pete here who reads the book and understands the book and talk to me about the book and make it very intriguing and interesting. i'm going to step out of the host mode and turn the show over to pete, he won't steal it i promise but he'll come back for interviews. i want to thank you. >> i cannot steal it if i wanted to, what an honor. >> i appreciate you handing this over to you far less capable. i study this book and i read it cover to cover i would advance copy of it. it's phenomenal, congratulations on a great book and out the gates i want to tell everybody it's worth giving to everybody in the state of our republic is that important. the last time we were here we were talking about american marxism, talk to the audience about how this is an extension you think about marxism as a cultural thing and let people see the democrat party hates america, people think they hate the democrat party but i don't think they do. mark: the title of the book i decided on it when i finish the book same with american marxism and that title describes what's going on in this country today. marxism is an alien ideology and a dangerous ideology and responsible for the death of 100 million people. why. because it's a failed ideology. ideology is inhumane it tries to take the human character under character and reengineer it and build an entire ideology and society around the re-triggered reengineered individual. the problem is god creates individuals, man cannot change individuals. we can create an environment where we can have law and order in the civil society where people can flourish if we emphasize liberty in the economic system that works with liberty, capitalism and recognize sovereignty and culture and assimilation under that culture. all of these things have gone on for a long time and they worked very, very well to create the greatest nation mankind has ever known since there was mankind. and then there are forces that are destroying it, there's always evil and there's always tierney and they take advantage of liberty, that the first book liberty and tierney. were now living in a society where nobody talks about liberty, were they trash her history, they rewrite our history that the democrat party has essentially devoured the culture. it does not disagree with anything that's taking place weather in the classroom or the border because it's created a so i finished american marxism and i thought to myself what is next and i watched the news and "fox & friends" on the weekend and during the week i watched her cable channel and some of the others and every day in and day out what are we doing. we are exposing what is happening to the country. and most of it is not good. why is it happening, is that mother nature doing all of these things, no. it is mankind doing all of these things. mankind, what does that mean. it is this party, the democrat party, the democrat party that defended slavery that is responsible for the civil war, the party of the confederacy, the party opposed to reconstruction. the party that pushed segregation for 100 years after the civil war. the party of eugenics. the party of racism, segregation, the party that re-segregated the military after republicans desegregated. as a party that we segregated the part under bureaucracy after the republicans desegregated. i explained the history of the party and who is responsible for these things. woodward wilson was out of the closet racist to the clan. i can give you a few examples right away so people have a taste. the book is too involved for anyone willing to explain it. but woodward wilson required for the first time that people apply for federal jobs in their photos so he can make sure blacks were not kidding federal jobs. he also, when he was president of princeton university bragged about the fact that not one black kid was admitted to princeton when he was a president of the university. he was the king of propaganda, the king of censorship. he wanted nothing to do with the black community, nothing to do the black press not under nothing to do with naacp he was a big interfaces. he was a two-term democrat president. but the democrats liked him. why? because he was one of the early marxist intellectual so-called intellectuals talk about perfecting society. but for the sloppiness of the vote in the sloppiness of the republicanism in the sloppiness of what goes on he felt that the judiciary was where we could change america forever. he despised the declaration of independence. he wrote about it and why do they despise the declaration of independence, the marxist replaced their own ideology with that of the lord. and that's why they attacked the family. because the family has a whole construct that interrupts with ideology. the faith has a whole social construct that interrupts with her ideology. the constitution is set up to protect us from this party. the democrat party even though people don't realize it. i find it really hilarious and repulsive at the same time that you have democrats today that condemn american history but they don't condemn their own party. >> not only do they not condemn their own parties are some of the ways we can go on the on the issue woodward wilson you the end of the book when you talk about the chapter that stalin would be proud they revived the espionage act from 1917 that woodward wilson used to get a political opponent with jack smith and donald trump today. there still using the same tactics. >> there's an explanation when i go to chapter three to chapter four about the democrat party that's an autocratic party, it's not like the republican party, the republican party is a political party, in many ways it's an effective party in many ways when the people vote it's a default party because they get what about for the radicalism of the democrat party the people don't know what the republican party stands for because the republican party doesn't know what it stands for. it's the perfect foil for a different kind of party the democrat party that knows what it stands for and where wants to take the country. the democrat party is not merely a political party. it's an autocratic party that seeks to replace loyalty to the party to loyalty to the country. >> you call it the state party. mark: the state run party, because why, they devoured our classrooms with the teachers unions and devoured our universities and colleges with her marxist tenured professors. they have devoured the whole idea of citizenship, the southern border is wide open, climate change did not cause that. mother nature did not cause a. mother biden because that in the democrat party. no matter how much they squeal in new york city and new york there still good about democrat. biden knows that the democrat party knows, why are they doing it. if you understand the democrat party, you understand you need to look through the lens of a power-hungry autocratic party that doesn't give a damn about the country. the reason the border is open so they can turn texas blue and when texas is blue the electoral gain is over. republicans can never win the presidency. the same reason they want to get rid of the electoral college. only the populated areas in the country, the big cities on the coast, maybe chicago and detroit, they are represented half the country no representation after that they want to take the california system and superimposed on the entire nation, the whole voting issue. i know i'm moving wildly. >> you talk about h.r.1. immediately coming into office, they try to nationalize the boat and blow out the protections of the states have, the propaganda is that we want people to vote and have access to vote. the only people that should vote for the people to have a legal right to vote. it's not everybody gets to vote. everybody doesn't get to vote. you need to be a citizen of the united states. what do they do we have the cleanest election in american history, did you know this in 2020 that's what the press tells us, think about this for a second. we have less voting id laws and any time in american history, drop boxes that are not secure, nobody's watching there aren't any cameras, anybody can drop anything into it, no signature in several states for absentee ballots, no dates in many states for absentee ballots, we have harvesting, that means people are voting in recounting the abodes after the election. yet some states where they have elections one month before the election so the guardrails are blown out. >> automatic registration of pennsylvania with a moderate democrat governor, there is no moderate democrat governor, what is interesting we have fraud in every single presidential election you had cook county, texas, west virginia, the democrats are better than anybody out there. the least secure election in american history that we are told had no fraud. the cleanest election in american history. it is because they took fraud and they legalized it they change the system and they enshrined it. when you go to court and sue and say the sky didn't have this or that, so what in your state it's perfectly legal. >> is a great example. it's what chapter forgets into as far as word and thought control change in the dictionary. they take something that is so self-evidently not true, the most secure election of all time and they repeated over and over again until that's what everyone needs to say why are they so good at that. >> if you're an autocratic party you know what your mission is, to take control of society. this is what they do. if you have questions about man-made climate change, you are dismissed, you don't get a grant you get a big scarlet letter carved into your forehead, you're a denier like a holocaust denier, there is no discussion, they control knowledge even when it's not knowledge, they control it. >> information. they repeated and they repeated and they repeat it. i read several books about individuals who suffered through totalitarian regime the third reich, stalin, mao, castro, they all say the same thing which is control the language, lenin said the language needs to be changed to accommodate the party, to accommodate the party so were not allowed to talk about women and men and what they are and so forth. >> that's what i love about this book, chapter four you pull out an unknown doctor and he wrote, you summarize objective verification of ideas is rejected since no reality on the dictatorial opinion exist. this is not something democrats made up in something that they're mimicking. in some cases it was mimicked and will get into this later on with other autocrats that looked at the early progressives and said that is something that we could do were here to controller people. it all seems to come back to power. >> i cannot tolerate different views, they cannot tolerate debate. because we can have paradise. we can have utopia if we have the single individuals or small groups of individuals, if we have free speech, free speech is the enemy, discussion is enemy, why is that relevant today, not only do you see the word changes because when you change words you change thought processes. when you change thought processes you change action. what the democrat party wants is zombies, how do we know that. we had the greatest attack on free speech since the civil war quite frankly, the biden administration through censorship. judges who looked at this independently have been shocked at the extent to which the biden administration used federal power to influence social media and social media platforms on everything from politics and the laptop to the virus, vaccines and everything in between. i just would be clear about something. as anemic as the republican party is, it does not do that. the republican party was not involved in lynching. they fought slavery. people need to understand, i do this through the discussion of franklin roosevelt. i take the most iconic democrat in american history, they think is the greatest president ever. i asked all these historians and all the documentaries and all the rest of it in books and books and books. he was a racist, he was an anti-semite, i mentioned in 1940 a bill at his desk, federal outlaw of lynching, he refused to sign it because he is running for unprecedented third term and he wanted the boat out of the south. he did more than that he backed the guy at the state department who intentionally locked jews who were trying to escape the third right and gas chambers are coming into the united states even though they had not met their quota. there was a quoted they were way under the quota and he was also successful working with the new york times another press outlet to censor the holocaust, what was taking place. we were bombing nazi locations s where they were taking juice to auschwitz. he never bombed the train tracks, people said he did not want to be diverted from the goal, they were 5 miles from the train tracks, then you look at his writings when he was working at the navy department and earlier about jews, he had his staff to hire an anthropologist who is curious as the president of what he called the intermixing of racist, this is always been part of the platform, unspoken perhaps of the democrat party racism. that's one chapter i talk about antiblack races. i talk about anti-white races. >> at the very next chapter, i never read any about that o abot fdr in my high school textbooks. mark: there's a lot more. >> a lot more and a lot worse. when we come back i want to ask you how is it then that the republican party today is deemed by those in control as a rhesus party. how did they flip that because your b >> welcome back to the special edition of "life liberty and levin" this is about mark's new book the democrat party hates america, it's an honor to be here, don't adjust your sets, i won't be here long. as i said before phenomenal read and following on the conversation we had a ready based on everything that you laid out, how are the democrats able to flip the narrative if it was the republicans who were and are the racist bigoted party it was a death move that they seem to make. mark: the demagogue party never to her history always rewriting history is really a taranto party that seemed to seek power. it's happy to be a million in the way that it conducts itself you that's why we've gone from antiblack racism which they thought was to his advantage to now antiwhite races, why? attack the founding for the 1619 project attacked the declaration which is basically john locke which is the most important philosopher of the revolutionary. and to attack the constitution which is basically montesquieu of the most import and philosopher of that. and they write about them in the federalist paper and attack everything american. capitalism, the whole founding and everything sense because the democrat party and does not accept this country. it did except when it was part of the confederacy, they wanted to tear it to shreds and it does not accept it today neither does a party of american marxism and all the marxist movement. you have to switch, you have to switch from oppressive minority to oppressing the majority because the history they say is one of a corrupt nation again now we have antiwhite racism. and you're not allowed to talk about it. you can't even write about it so i say to hell with these people. and you'll notice in that chapter how i talk about the rise of what i call civil rights marxism treated the civil rights movement today, who's the leader of the civil rights movement, nobody. why isn't there leader of the civil rights movement anymore, most of the objectives of the old civil rights movement have been met, a colorblind society but for the democrat party. >> you laid out the vote count of the civil rights act of 1965. >> is overwhelming, the republican party has supported every civil rights act right after the civil war up until today, huge swaths of the democrat party have opposed every civil rights act from right after the civil war up until today. my key point in trying to get across, the civil rights movement has turned into an economic movement into a marxist movement which is why the trashing of capitalism from, the heroes and others about equity, we don't all start at the same place which is why bernie sanders is a marxist. >> and you cite that marxist was talking about equity versus equality. mark: exactly. you have 10 - 15% of the democrats of the house of representatives were marxist. this is remarkable thing, my view i'm not a politician, i don't live and die by polls. i read history, i study the documents, i know what's going on in i'm going to call it exactly the way it's happening with what we see. you have to put the puzzle pieces together. what the democratic party host on is its own rotten lousy hateful bloodless history onto the inept incompetent, really irresponsible republican party, the party of who, mitch mcconnell. >> i was going to say lincoln. mark: i did anything abraham lincoln will get the support today of the republicans in the senate, do you know why he's too aggressive, can't we do something bipartisan, whatever, i know they did not support ronald reagan one of the greatest presidents in american history, they opposed ronald reagan they did not want him to get the nomination the bush crowd tried to stop him and did on more than one occasion. mcconnell was never a reagan guy, karl rove was never a reagan guy even though he said he was. everybody chris christie, these are all ford bush guys now all of a sudden, they hated reagan because reagan was an unapologetic capitalist. because reagan saw the soviet union as the enemy. he was anti-communist so they said he was stupid. so they said he could not win elections. >> what they want i love the quote that you pull out, basically a controlled opposition they want to cripple the opposition of the gop without annihilating they want the other party so it doesn't look like authoritarianism as long as they sit in the corner. >> they have a republican party that has been neutered and is done so well entirely. while the republican party doesn't want to fundamentally transform america, it is could you put into it which is why the republican party opposed, there are certain things that we need to take a stand because they are right regardless of the politi politics. you don't see that coming out of the united states and on the republican side. what you see coming out of the united states and is the foot on the gas pedal to destroy the status quo, the traditions, the institutions, the civil society, the constitution, this is how they sleep at night thinking about it in their dreams, the wake up in the morning, and were constantly on the defense and we don't embrace liberty like you should. >> one of the institutions they are targeting which is the core i got this $1,000 camera for only $41 on dealdash. dealdash.com, online auctions since 2009. this playstation 5 sold for only 50 cents. this ipad pro sold for less than $34. and this nintendo switch, sold for less than $20. i got this kitchenaid stand mixer for only $56. i got this bbq smoker for 26 bucks. and shipping is always free. go to dealdash.com right now and see how much you can save. shooting as a potential hate crime. i am jon scott, now back to life, liberty and the bee leben. >> welcome back to a special edition of "life liberty and levin". with the great one mark levin in the democrat party hates america. when we went to break we were talking about the nuclear family and the war on the nuclear family a lot about politics and culture now is getting personal from the democrats. mark: by