0 naturall constituency, the pictures of the internet. you'll noticee the servants of color in the background had to remain mass . cover your face, sir, if that's seems hypocritical view, what's your science? that's it forence. us tonight.. we'll be back eight pm following every weeknight upsilon and welcome to hannity. all right.we we begin with news just this minuteht nowow and we start with a fox newsew alert now according to a breaking news report from politico, the u.s. supreme court has in fact voted to overturn roe versus wade. if this report turns out to be true, abortion will now be regulated at the state level, meaning it is not going to be illegal probably in most states in the united states they'll be very restrictions. o one of the biggest issues involving this case has to do with whether or not whether ore not roe v. wade and this is what conservatives often believed constitutionalists have believed originaliststu hae believed is that it enumerated a right that did not exist within the constitution. what's interesting aboutn. this is the draft opinion, unflinching repudiation of the seventy three decision guaranteeing a federaler constitutional protection on abortionalon rights as they report in politico, planned parenthood versus caseyca that largely maintainn that right. s report i if this report is true , justice alito writes roe washe egregiously wrong from the start and we hold that roehe and casey must be overruled. he writes in the documentt labeled quote opinion of the court it is time to heed the constitution, return the issue of abortion to the people's the elected representatives. that's where the issue of th comes intoosophy play. do you enumerate a right? not specifically enumerate spelt in the constitution or should it be up tohe the states which s what conservatives have always argued deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. justices t can sometimes do change their votes and opinionsa as opinions are circulated among the different supremereur court justices. major decisionsma can be subject to multiple draftsti training sometimes until just days before the decision is unveiled . but the real heart of alito's words if in fact this remains the final decision would be roe was egregiously wrong fromre the start. its reasoning was exceptionally weak and the decisionpt has had damaging consequences. and far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, roert ioand casey have inflamed debate and deepened division in this countryy. ify we look at what they were reporting, a person familiar t with the deliberations, according to politico, said that four othero republican appointed justices clarence thomas, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, amy coni berrett voted with alito in the conference and held among the justices after hearingal oral arguments. this is back in december. we, a don'trgument,ck i expect i decision sometime in june, maybe july, even usually in mayy or june. but the three b democratic appointed justices breyer, sotomayor, kagan, a working on one or more dissents that would be part of any final decisionf that comes out. but it's going to be interesting to watch this absolutely be demagogued by the left in the country. but at the end of the day, the document labeled as a first draft of the majority opinion, c it would indicate they may be leaning as of tonight to overruling roe v. wade. that is considered a precedent . the inescapable, inescapable conclusion is the right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation's history or tradition.s the constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion, the draft concludes.rt in other words, abortion willl not be made not illegal by the federal government.st it willates be up to to the stao decidee.. d roe and casey abrogated that authority. we now overrule these a decisior and return our authority to the people and their elected representatives of a lot more inpresav this breaking news straight ahead tonight .tonigh but this is this is pretty interesting just to be very clear here, evenen though this s a draft, sounds like the likelihood that's where their their decision is headed toward. so we'll watch this very closely. also tonight , coming up,htin a bombshell new development from the durham probe. we also have disturbingo have dt new video showing alleged antifa rioting attackingnt republicans in portland. by the way, policee, took forevr to get there. ce the bidenle administration is celebrating a looming food shortagemi that would force america's farmers to quote, go green . really? re that's the next that's the next inflation. that's the nextal ition? hike o nowfo the food prices aren't hio enough anyway. we'll also weigh in on joe's big weekend in washington, d.c. by the way, my record is intact in all the years i've been on radio. thirty five years twenty six and a half years at foxar. i've never been to a single white house correspondents dinner and i did not break that record and show up this weekend. and i never will. particu i know they don't like me.la ply i don't particularly like them so let's not play games anyway. they did have some fun. s good at our expense. that's also good.at's also and saturday's white house correspondents dinner will give you an update. now we want to introduce you to a not so bright msnbc and c host who's having a really hard time coping with twitter's new ownership. now we go to one of their hosts. i don't really know this guy meti hassan. h his dangerous neo-nazis are now poised to takeou over the county all because elon musk bought twitter and elon musk is saying stay on twitter. all my critics feel free to attack me because that's what free speech is all about. atthat upset. ta take a look.ke we are living through an unspin koblin dangerous moment. the pro killing on pro neo-nazi faction of the republican party is poised to expand dramatically come the midterms with just two years away from donald trump, very possibly seizing executive power. if that happens p, we may lookot back on this past week as a pivotal moment when a petulant and not so bright billionaire casually bought one of the world's most influential messaging machines and just handed ithid to the far right. now today elon musk, he responded tweeting quote nbc is basically saying republicans are. w by theay way, elon, i don't know if you've ever watched the show. are you watching tonight ? every single day used to be every two years, every four years. now it's pretty much every day.o republicans are racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic. now transphobia, they want dirty air, water. they want grandma and grandpa only to eat dog a and cat food and then they want some prominent republican lookalike to take granny and grandpaalee in a wheelchair and throw them over a cliff. welcome to my world. welcome to the world of conservatism. this is the same organization that covered up hunter biden laptop. he goes on and had the harvey i weinstein story early and they killed it and they built matt lauer. his he wrote his office, wolf, and he's talking about that lock thing that had been reported.w as i don't know if that was ever ee verifiedr. lovely people, he writes. anyway, i'll add this is the same network that brings you joy read conspiracy theoristngscy t of all time, rachel maddow and until recently lione brian williams, you know the guy that saw dead bodies floating during katrina in front of his hotel that wasn't flooded and needless to say, nbc news doesn't exactly value truth neither does fake news.ns cnn for that matter, both organizations are only propagandaanda arms for the dnc. they peddle on lies, conspiracyl theories always to advanceda the socialist agenda hate on conservative everything conservative and trump and all trump supporters t. ca and on sunday, one cnn guest called for the federal government to step s in regulate discourse on twitter before it's too latetwit. want -- take a look. musk doesn't want you know, he's upset with see how dare they question him, you know what i'm saying? this is dangerous.this we can't think anymore in this country. we don't have people. no, i'm serious. we don't have people in congress who can make regulations that can make it work. i think we l can look to the western countries in europe for how they areit trying to limit it. but you need you need controls on this. you need regulation. you cannot let these guys o control discourse in this country or we are headedr we tod we are there. tll trump opened the gates of .. now they're chasing now whereer were these people when donald trump conservatives banned, suspended, canceledve shadow band? you t know, this is a common theme on the left. it's called hypocrisy. unlike many of my so-called competitorset, i've never called for any show or any host or any guest to be canceled or boycotted or censored. ori believe in free speech and e don't like what they say. i hope you tune them out. most americans already are. but according to theman the american people, you can't be trusted't. only big mother government knows right from wrong. for example, all msnbc and fakec news cnnnn freak out about ellen usque and free speech on twitter. all of a sudden they ignoredbu all this time they're allt but applauding the homeland security secretaryec and his announcement or pronouncement of creepy new disinformed a governance. s florida, as we call it on thisit show, the socialist democrats minister of leftist truth.r this here in the u.s.he there's been an uproarme in recent days about the department of homeland securitynte setting up what they call a disinformation governance board. this has beenis mostly a foxwell story and it could come upy. earlier today on cnn's state of the union. but i don't think people know what it is and what it isn't. and there's just been a lot of right wing uproar withouts. knowing what it is. so now keep in mind the dhs, they were founded after 9/11. we lost nearly three thousand of our fellow americans. they were designed to prevent another 9/11, another attack on the homeland a. butt under secretary mayorkas,ur what the department is now turne their focus inward, a complete dereliction of duty, a complete retreat from a post 9/11 world and policies to keep every american and this country safe from terrorists. t by the way, how many terrorists encounters that they have at the border ? how m forty one . we don'tmi even know how many people might have snuck in that we don't know about.ti and according to mayorkas, this and climate change, they are the crises of the day and apparently we have no one to blame but ourselves. in other words,ev the administration the greatesteves threat to this great country are we the american people not to look into domestic terrorism. thosek scary mommies and daddies at school board meetingsed that will be investigated for domestic terrorism if they dare to raise f i their voice against crt or age inappropriate . ucation and counter to this grave threat matrix announced a newth ministry of truth to be led by a far left lunatic who ironically spreads a ton ofn disinformation all the time. for example, in april 2020, nina jankowicz referred to the covid-19 lab leak theory as baseless rumor spread by trump supporters false chinese state run media frequently cited her fictitious claims using them in their own disinformation campaign and janco it's also spread misinformation playing down the hunter biden laptop. she called that a trump campaign product. another disinformed lie. she placed this information dossier author christopher steele and on twitter she enthusiastically voiced her support for hillary clinton and echoed hillary's insane claim that trump would wouldol embolden isis. no trump actually wiped them o off the planet and sent them straight to where they belongbu . butrr don't worry, let not your heart be troubled. according to mayorkas, new dis information minister is totally neutral with no bias at allll who will only act in the best interest of americans on a government disinformation board that will never abuse its power? dn't t what he's saying. and they tellhey tel sat with fa warrants. yeah, i think they didsa take a look at american citizens being monitored. no guaranteecan citiz that whato with the department of homeland security don't monitor americanu citizens who don't, but we border, change that . no, no, no. the board does not have any operational otho or capability. what it will do is gather together best practices in addressing the threat of disinformation from foreign state adversaries from the cartels and disseminate those best practices to the operators that have been executing in addressing for years. g oh , so we're supposed to take his word for then the federal government also tell us that the fisa program. that's right. would never be used against americans. tell that to carter page and donald trump. and what about this shocking. t. report from late last week detailing how the fbide actually was caught searching millions of emails and texts and other electronic communications of americans without any warrantnini whatsoe. now the last thing this country needs is yet another government program that gets used and abused to monitor americans communication. i live this life every day.ve it's a great joy. try it one day. now to first back to tonight's g breaking newss fr from the supre court.cour here ist. what wewe know and that is the host here with what she knows. the host of fox news at night trying to bring him alongni without no co-host kayleigh mcenanyng w chaton becauseo, as politico they do have a degree of credibilityof and i read through all of this and it was breaking literallyte 10 minutes before we came on the air, shannon, and used to cover the supreme t court for fox. so you know the supreme court well, i cannot think of a single instance that i recall where there's ever been a leak at the court. so so part of me is suspicious. the specificity of it makes me think it would not w at all surprised me if this is real. yeah..ea and i have been i will say this very carefully. i have been not wai waved off that this is actually real. now remember, this is a draft dated in february. , these drafts go back and forth. they can change votes can change until it actually is signed off by the nine justices or whoever if there are people recuse all of the justices hearing the case until it's signedere off and it's issued fm the court's office officially as an opinion of the court has. it's not the real deal . so this is a draft if it is legit, as i've been led to believe it is from february, which means a lot off things could have changed.d there are there could be justices who would read this and say, wow, this is sweeping . i'm not prepared to sign up to something this sweeping or you could have five justices who've already saids this is something i will sign onto. and basically what it does if u this ends up being the opinion in some form or fashion, if it w uses this wording, it's essentially sending the idea of abortion back to the states and saying they will decide at the people there decide itss upholds the mississippi law and says roe and casey got it completely wrong. it's over 100 hundred pages. i am still reading, buttu the conclusions are there, sean, if it turns out to be what ends up as thereta the final draft. i want toy y stay with the pros for one second because it'sop very common that drafts of opinions are circulatedin for four notes from the other justices that seem to be inclined to vote a certain way. my understanding my sources at the time told me that up to the last minute that chiefe justice roberts was going to a put an end to obamacare and changed his mind at the last momentt. so i want i want our viewers to be very careful here. this is not final. this is not a final decision. decisions drastic change and change dramatically. it doesge have a little bit of credibility as i read it, as a possibility. e but it's certainly not definitive. and you've watched that process all troou the years you covered the supreme court, correct? yeah. and right>> . and you're absolutely rightaf about what happened with the affordable care act. there were essentially two opinionsing to that were being written written by the conservative wing, the more liberal wing and at times both wings thought that the chief justice john roberts was a vote with them.tt there wasem an attempt at one point when he decided to go with the liberal wing, with the among the conservatives to bring him back in to their side. they had this meeting.g. ca back together to get together and when he showed up and they realized he was noti with them, they thought there's t nothing else we can do. we've lost him at this point. f, so there a wasnd some backpe and forth and that clearly could have happened in this believe ce this februaryince dr. and like i said, i've been led to believe that this was legitimate as a february draft . a lot could have happened between now and then. i have never as you said, seen a leak like this at the court in the years that i've covered it. itvet. is astonishing that somey would release a draft opinionon outsidee the court. ifey are very tightly held. there are almost never any leaks from this one place in washington. every place else leaks like a sieve l around here, not s the court. and this is shocking actually .f you know and let me go to the political side of this . if if true , it would not surprise me as a conservano and you as somebody that knows the law as well. ll. have often argued that roe is bad law. it had enumerated rights to people that were not in the constitution and it shouldf, be noted very, very clearly that if in fact it were to be true and again, we're saying this very cautiously. this is on politico tonight and this is a pretty bombshell report. i did havet. i one person write mead and says this is likely true and i had somebody else writet me and say it's likely not true . but what it would mean for i the people in this country ist it doesn't mean abortion would be outlawed or illegal. it would be sent back to the states and the state representatives would decide within their state what the law should be , correct? rig >> that's right. and it wouldd mean that we areh no longer one of eight country son . and yes, you heard me correctly eight countries in the world that allow elective abortion after 20 weeks. exactly right. go back to the states, a state like texas or a state like mississippi could say after 15 weeks no elective abortions, whereas a state like new york or new jersey coulde take a different path. it would also mean, shawn, we're not among the good company. as justice roberts said during oral arguments of the people's republic of china in north korea because right now that is exactly where the united states stands with our abortion laws. we know 60 million children, 62 million have perishedly because of this law. o state that's nearlys one fifth of the united states population. and you're exactly right tos note that from the beginning sean roe was wronglywr decided.a even laurence tribe, a liberal jurist, said that this is a verbal smokescreen. that's what he called roe, the substantive judgment of which was nowhere to be found.ht ruth baderer ginsburg, she thought that it was better left althou states. she was a critic ofgh roe, thouh she was a proponent of abortion rights generally, she thoughtth the democratic process was the way at least she made one or two comments intimating that this was badad law. this would put us on the side of life would allow states like mississippi and texas to decide one way states like new jersey and new york, decide another. pt so put me down as very skeptic shot and only because i've been doing this a longg time. i have never seen anything like. this ever leak froms. the u.s. supreme co