at an england fan zone in london as the goal went in. the three lions are one of the favourites to win the tournament, having reached the final in the last euros. 0ur correspondentjoe inwood is at a pub with england fans in london. how was the reaction there, joe? we know they won at least. how was the reaction there, joe? we know they won at least.— know they won at least. absolutely. ri . ht on know they won at least. absolutely. right on cue. _ know they won at least. absolutely. right on cue, it's _ know they won at least. absolutely. right on cue, it's sweet _ know they won at least. absolutely. right on cue, it's sweet caroline. i right on cue, it's sweet caroline. normal unlike it wouldn't be an england win without this, the unofficial anthem coming 0n. england win without this, the unofficial anthem coming on. now people are relaxed, people have come down. but they were not throughout that second half. in the first—half, england had the running, we were 1—0 up england had the running, we were 1—0 up within ten, 12 minutes or so. but the second half was much more nervy. although it was a great here, it was not subdued, but very tense. serbia really were all over england for parts of that. you could feel it here, people were sort of thinking, after that amazing first half, is the old england back? but they hung on. it wasn't classic in the second half, it wasn't an amazing game in the last 45, but it doesn't matter, three points are three points. people here are very much going to be enjoying it. let speak to a couple of guys. we watch the game with these two guys here. we are live on telly now. what did you make of it? i live on telly now. what did you make of it? ., , live on telly now. what did you make of it? . , ., ., ~' live on telly now. what did you make of it? . , ., of it? i really en'oyed it. look at the of it? i really enjoyed it. look at the atmosphere. _ of it? i really enjoyed it. look at the atmosphere. we _ of it? i really enjoyed it. look at the atmosphere. we can - of it? i really enjoyed it. look at the atmosphere. we can do - of it? i really enjoyed it. look at l the atmosphere. we can do more. of it? i really enjoyed it. look at. the atmosphere. we can do more. i of it? i really enjoyed it. look at - the atmosphere. we can do more. i am expecting _ the atmosphere. we can do more. i am expecting more. the atmosphere. we can do more. i am expecting more-— expecting more. what was your rediction expecting more. what was your prediction at — expecting more. what was your prediction at the _ expecting more. what was your prediction at the start - expecting more. what was your prediction at the start of - expecting more. what was your prediction at the start of the . expecting more. what was your - prediction at the start of the game? i said for having zero. i believed in the _ i said for having zero. i believed in the team. it isjust the first game — in the team. it is just the first game "— in the team. it isjust the first game. —— 4—0. in the team. it is 'ust the first game. -- 4-0._ in the team. it is 'ust the first game. -- 4-0. in the team. it is 'ust the first came. -- 4-0. ., ., ., , game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero, game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero. what — game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero. what did — game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero, what did you _ game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero, what did you make _ game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero, what did you make of— game. -- 4-0. you said to have been zero, what did you make of the - zero, what did you make of the performance? i zero, what did you make of the performance?— performance? i en'oyed it. the performance _ performance? i en'oyed it. the performance was — performance? i enjoyed it. the performance was a _ performance? i enjoyed it. the performance was a bit - performance? i enjoyed it. the performance was a bit shaky, l performance? i enjoyed it. the i performance was a bit shaky, but performance? i enjoyed it. the - performance was a bit shaky, but we did what— performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we — performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we needed _ performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we needed to _ performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we needed to do. _ performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we needed to do. we - performance was a bit shaky, but we did what we needed to do. we just l did what we needed to do. we just need _ did what we needed to do. we just need a _ did what we needed to do. we just need a bit — did what we needed to do. we just need a bit more _ did what we needed to do. we just need a bit more later— did what we needed to do. we just need a bit more later in— did what we needed to do. we just need a bit more later in the - need a bit more later in the tournament. _ need a bit more later in the tournament.— need a bit more later in the tournament. ~ . , ., ., ~ ., tournament. what did you make of the trent alexander-arnold _ tournament. what did you make of the trent alexander-arnold role? - tournament. what did you make of the trent alexander-arnold role? the - trent alexander—arnold role? the idea of using somebody who plays at right back in the centre of the park, what did you make of that? did it work? i park, what did you make of that? did it work? ~' ., ~' park, what did you make of that? did it work? ~' ., ~ it work? i think it worked. the way the name it work? i think it worked. the way the game was _ it work? i think it worked. the way the game was going, _ it work? i think it worked. the way the game was going, it _ it work? i think it worked. the way the game was going, it didn't - it work? i think it worked. the way | the game was going, it didn't really no, the game was going, it didn't really go. but _ the game was going, it didn't really go. but leter— the game was going, it didn't really go. but later in— the game was going, it didn't really go, but later in the _ the game was going, it didn't really go, but later in the trimmer- the game was going, it didn't really go, but later in the trimmer could i go, but later in the trimmer could be good _ go, but later in the trimmer could be good for— go, but later in the trimmer could be good for us _ go, but later in the trimmer could be good for oe— go, but later in the trimmer could be good for us. given we have got the first three _ be good for us. given we have got the first three points, _ be good for us. given we have got the first three points, do - be good for us. given we have got the first three points, do you - the first three points, do you reckon england are fairly sure to go through to the knockout stages? i think we should be good from here on out. think we should be good from here on out two— think we should be good from here on out. two more wins and we be fine. having _ out. two more wins and we be fine. having watched the first eight games played now or so, how do you think are the favourites? {iii played now or so, how do you think are the favourites?— are the favourites? of the favourites _ are the favourites? of the favourites is _ are the favourites? of the favourites is either - are the favourites? of the favourites is either france j are the favourites? of the i favourites is either france or are the favourites? of the - favourites is either france or us. france, — favourites is either france or us. france, portugaland england, that is my— france, portugaland england, that is my top— france, portugaland england, that is my top three. i france, portugal and england, that is my top three-— is my top three. i did not organise this, i have _ is my top three. i did not organise this, i have not _ is my top three. i did not organise this, i have not organised - is my top three. i did not organise this, i have not organised in - this, i have not organised in music, but right on cue, is it coming home? i will say yes, it is coming home. i will i will say yes, it is coming home. will put you i will say yes, it is coming home. i will put you on the spot. i say - i will say yes, it is coming home. i will put you on the spot. i say this| will put you on the spot. i say this every four— will put you on the spot. i say this every four years. _ will put you on the spot. i say this every four years, but _ will put you on the spot. i say this every four years, but it's - will put you on the spot. i say this every four years, but it's coming l every four years, but it's coming home! _ every four years, but it's coming home! ~ ., ., ., ., home! who am i to argue? i will let this gentleman _ home! who am i to argue? i will let this gentleman come _ home! who am i to argue? i will let this gentleman come through - home! who am i to argue? i will let this gentleman come through first. | this gentleman come through first. people have decided it is officially, one game in, it's coming home. i officially, one game in, it's coming home. ., ., ,., home. i love the fact that your ruests home. i love the fact that your guests there — home. i love the fact that your guests there were _ home. i love the fact that your guests there were talking - home. i love the fact that yourl guests there were talking about home. i love the fact that your - guests there were talking about 4-0. guests there were talking about 4—0. not quite right, but a win is a win. we can see the celebrations behind you, joe. a good atmosphere, i guess, when it comes to this being a sunday night in london. a relief, let's put it that way, after that testy, punchy comeback in the second half from serbia. it testy, punchy comeback in the second half from serbia.— half from serbia. it was. the first half, when _ half from serbia. it was. the first half, when you're _ half from serbia. it was. the first half, when you're sitting - half from serbia. it was. the first half, when you're sitting around, | half, when you're sitting around, that goal goes in after 12 minutes, suddenly expectation stock it is classic england, isn't it? as soon as anything slightly positive happens, everyone assumes we will run away with it and win the tournament. 0bviously that will not be the case. this is international football, it is always going to be difficult. serbia are a good side, they have got players like mitrovic who can score. but england held on, they shut the game down or stop it wasn't a classic in the second half, but it didn't stop people enjoying it, it didn't stop people getting into the mood here in south london. we get the picture. joe, as always, thank you very much. i think the quote of the night is a classic england. joe inwood there in brixton in south london. thank you very much to you and your guests. so, yes, england beating serbia i—0. some of the celebrations there in south london in the uk. during the match build—up, before the game, police in the host city gelsenkirchen said there was an altercation between english and serbian fans; the two groups were separated and seven serbian nationals were taken into custody. 0ne serb is being investigated on a criminal complaint of grievous bodily harm. british police say no england supporters appear to have been detained. the police have said the england—serbia match is a high—risk game. i've been speaking to our correspondent, nick beake, who is in gelsenkirchen. the big hope is that there isn't any trouble whatsoever, but the local police here said that potentially 500 people who they have deemed to be hooligans from serbia had managed to get to germany. and the problem is serbia haven't appeared in major tournaments over the past, you know, 5, 10, 15, 20 years, so there isn't this intelligence picture, this database for them to look at. in contrast to that, we know the british police have stopped 2,000 people from coming to germany in the first place, so the hope is that those who may have been intent on causing trouble won't be able to make it here. but still, a lot of english police here cooperating with the germans, really looking to spot potential troublemakers in the crowd. and i think the key thing is keep the two sets of supporters apart each other, so that is the hope. as we can see, yeah, more of those england fans coming up from where they descended about 5, 10,20 minutes to go, so it looks like they're going to have to find another route to get to the stadium to watch the match. loads of fans with tickets, but of course some without and they will be watching the game in some of the big screens and specifically in the pubs, i should think, around here. that was nick beake speaking to me a head of the match, the fans heading towards the stadium. we are monitoring the situation there, but i have not seen any details as to the situation on the ground there. hopefully it will be calmer. let's bring you up—to—date with the day's other matches. the netherlands won their first group game of the tournament, coming from behind to beat poland 2—1 in hamburg. and denmark and slovenia have drawn 1—1 in stuttgart. butjust before that match between the netherlands and poland in hamburg, german police shot a man who threatened officers with a pickaxe and a molotov cocktail, close to a fanzone in the centre of the city. these pictures show a man wielding an axe, being confronted by police. they use pepper spray, and then fire several shots. this video doesn't capture all of those shots fired, there were more. we've paused them at the moment when some of those gun shots were fired. the attacker was injured in the leg, and has been receiving medical care but his condition is not life—threatening. it is not thought to be related to the game between netherlands and poland, which took place in hamburg today. a spokesperson for the hamburg police spoke shortly after the incident. translation: according to what we know now, i a man came out of a restaurant. he obviously had a molotov cocktail in his hand and also pickaxe. he also apparently tried to set fire to this molotov cocktail and then walked towards several people with it, including police officers who were on duty here at the time. and the police officers then made use of their firearms. we're assuming that this is an isolated case, which means that it's not football related. there's obviously no football connection, but we're dealing with an individual offender. and in this respect, i don't see any danger at all or any impact on the game today. the hamburg police there. lots more on the situation there and more of the euro 2024 sports news on our website. here in the uk, the shadow health secretary wes streeting has said he would have liked labour to have been more ambitious in its plans for social care in its election manifesto. in an interview this morning, he acknowledged that successive governments of all parties had failed to deal with the problems in the sector. a leading health think tank warned that the nhs is facing its tightest spending for decades and called on all the main parties to be more transparent about that. hannah miller reports. good morning. how are you doing? very good, and you? keir starmer campaigning this weekend, claiming he'll get the nhs back on its feet. but that will require more ambitious treatment, says a leading health think tank, as it warns both the conservatives and labour that their current manifesto commitments amount to the tightest spending plans in nhs history. with the lack of social care support one of the key reasons the nhs is struggling, labour says it would improve pay and career progression for care workers. but today, the man who might be health secretary in a few weeks' time had to defend why there's no extra cash for social care in labour's manifesto. you're still offering people a vague "we'll talk about it, we'll maybe fix it in the long term." i think in being honest with people that building a national care service is work that's a decade in the making, that's honest, and that's where the credibility comes from. i make no bones about the fact, of course, on social care, i would have wanted the manifesto to be more ambitious, but to get policies in the manifesto, you had to run the gauntlet of answering two fundamental questions. can we keep this promise? can the country afford this promise? the conservatives' proposals around social care have been repeatedly delayed and also face questions about funding, but they insist bringing taxes down is a priority and claim labour would end up spending more. i think he's let the cat out of the bag a bit about labour's plans. he confirmed both on your show and on one he did earlier that their manifesto actually wasn't the whole story. it wasn't actually a programme for government, it was a document to get them through the election campaign. and he's confirmed that there are more spending promises to come and that can mean only one thing. it means more taxes. that's not really what labour are saying. their argument is they'd spend more if economic conditions allow. both labour and the conservatives are signed up to a plan to bring in thousands more staff to the nhs, which would require funding to increase significantly — to almost £200 billion by 2028. but this is the level of funding they've allocated in their manifestos — around £20 billion less. the nuffield trust says it amounts to tougher spending plans than even during austerity. the liberal democrats have pledged very slightly more, but still way below what's required. that liberal democrat figure doesn't include their separately costed plans for free personal care for those who need it. if you don't support the family carers as well as the care workers, you're not going to sort this out. and i am absolutely passionate that we're going to do that. we've come forward with probably the most ambitious agenda on it. i'm really excited about it. and, you know, because we've talked about it, we've had a really strong reaction from people. politicians from all parties have said they need to work together to address the social care challenge. the question is who voters trust more and whether anyone will deliver. hannah miller, bbc news. more on the uk election on our website. world leaders have committed to ukraine's territorial integrity at the conclusion of a peace summit in switzerland. they've urged dialogue, the exchange of all prisoners and the return of abducted ukrainian children. but russia—friendly nations, including india, south africa and brazil, refused to sign the final declaration. meanwhile, in russia, the kremlin spokesman dmitry peskov said president putin was not ruling out talks with ukraine. mr peskov was speaking to a reporter from russian state tv before the summit on the 14th ofjune. translation: putin is not rejecting anything. - he is not rejecting the possibility of talks. he says that there are legitimate bodies there in accordance with the country's constitution. who is authorised to conduct negotiations? negotiations, as a rule, are conducted by expert people. but the results of negotiations are recorded by legitimate representatives. 0ur eastern europe correspondent sarah rainsford reports from switzerland. it was to this swiss mountain retreat that politicians came this weekend to talk peace, to discuss ending the biggest conflict in europe since the second world war. what they achieved was a joint declaration affirming ukraine's right not to be invaded. but some, including saudi arabia and india, didn't sign up. volodymyr zelensky is still hailing a great success, arguing the world must meet russia's full—scale invasion with full—scale diplomacy. are you worried that international support for ukraine on the battlefield, to win this on the battlefield is weakening, and that's why you're talking piece? —— is weakening, and that's why you're talking peace? translation: it is not because we are weakerj that we are tal