cardia.com or amazon limit of waters cable ready to show the world how good i am. >> i trained all over the globe. >> and that's what you're going to see an aw, whole, whole different beast. we wednesday night dynamite it aid on tbs closed captioning is brought to you by sokoloff law mesothelial ma victims call now $30 billion in trust money has been set aside. >> you may be entitled to a portion of that money. all when 8085920400. that's when 8085920400 welcome to cnn news central at any moment, president joe biden will hold a joint news conference with ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy at the g7 summit in italy this is a high-stakes moment for the alliance. >> both leaders are trying to shore up support for ukraine's defense against russia. >> and they're expected to discuss a new long-term security pact between washington and kyiv. the comes as former president trump spoke just minutes ago after meeting with republican lawmakers on capitol hill cnn's mj lee and nic robertson are both in italy covering the g7 summit, mj to you first, what are we expecting to see in here with biden and zelenskyy? >> briana we are running just a little bit behind schedule, but the stage is set behind us at this hotel in southern italy where the president is staying for that joint news conference between president biden and president zelenskyy, of course, coming on the heels of some major moves by the g7 and the united states this week to try to shore up global support for ukraine. and when the two leaders take the stage, we expect that they're going to approach the table that is at the middle of the stage, and that is where they will sign that new bilateral agreement between the two countries. it says that the two countries will cooperate for ten years. on important issues like the production of weapons and military equipment, the training of armed forces and intelligence sharing, and it's really important to underscore just the sense of urgency here that is in place for both of the leaders, of course, president zelenskyy has made really clear how much he is depending on this kind of boosted support from all of the other countries that are supporting ukrainians. war efforts to try to gain momentum on the battlefield. and then for president biden, all of this is coming out a moment where he is just facing his reelection several months away. and of course, is very, you know, understanding of the fact and sensitive to the fact that, you know, if there is a second donald trump term that raises a whole lot of questions about what could happen to the us's support for ukraine as well as some of the actions that have been taken here at the g7 this week. now, the president is expected to take two questions from to reporters, as is typical at a so-called two and two press conference, where two liters are on stage. of course, no shortage of questions, both related to foreign issues and issues at home for the president to be asked about. >> i'm joe biden was also just asked whether he's confident that there will be a ceasefire deal in gaza soon. how did he respond? >> yeah, boris, for all of the discussion about the war in ukraine this week at the g7, the other conflict that has been consuming so much of the president's time, of course, is the conflict in israel and what the president just told reporters is that he is not confident that a ceasefire deal well, it can be reached soon, though he did add, i haven't lost hope. so this is the president publicly confirming what had become really evident. the last couple of days that the ceasefire negotiations that have been ongoing for so many months appear to have once again stalled after hamas responded to the latest israeli proposal also requesting additional changes. we did see secretary of state antony blinken earlier this week expressing frustration at the state of the developments and really even questioning whether the group is interested in the war coming to an end. and this certainly has to be a really frustrating moment for president biden as well, who has put so much on the line and as he tried, has he has tried to navigate this war and has certainly paid a political price at home throughout the course of the war as well all right, mj. >> thank you so much and obviously will be monitoring the president there to see when he does begin his remarks. as you said, he's running a little late. that is not unusual let's go to nic robertson it's in nic president biden says he's not confident a ceasefire will get done soon. is that the sentiment that's being shared among the rest of those leaders at the g7 yeah, it is the g7 leaders, of course, signed up to president biden's proposal, little over will almost two weeks ago. >> now, there was there was broad agreement here from this group of leaders that this was the right approach. and i think pretty much they all followed the same view that the pressure was on hamas. they were all signed up the idea that pressure should be put on hamas to commit itself to agreeing to this, to agreeing to the terms. now of course, what hamas is saying is that they have come back with some proposals. they're saying that this is them being constructive, but the read it's very clearly that the option here was for them to end the war and the suffering of the people in gaza and begin to move towards the things that they want, like the humanitarian access, like the ceasefire, like the withdrawal of israeli forces. but of course, there was a lot of detail that wasn't made public, and some of that appears to have been what hamas was pressing for. but i think you'll find in europe at the moment a degree of frustration, just like the united states. and this is having an impact on politics and life for people on the streets in all communities. it may not have the same, quite the same political implications that it's having four for president biden in the upcoming presidential elections. but for example, look at the uk elections that are coming up on 4 july. >> there certainly people candidates, independent candidates who are putting themselves forward because they don't think the current government or even the opposition is doing enough to support the people in gaza. and therefore, they're likely to take votes away from the labour party who are expected to get voted into. this is something that all these leaders there's a feeling at the moment neck pivoting back to ukraine. >> what's your sense among g7 liters about the urgency they feel to get aid into ukraine as soon as possible, given what we've seen, are setbacks recent setbacks on the battlefield against russia no, look if there really frank, the answer is, there was a huge amount of frustration watching the united states go through for them painfully long and torturous process so get the money approved for that big commitment of 60 billion that kate finally came through a month or so ago. >> it wasn't that the european union had plain sailing with their plans to put 50 billion, commit 50 billion worth of military and other support to ukraine. there were a couple of european union members, hungry. one in particular, who were against, against supporting ukraine in this way. so they had their own problems there there was frustration watching the united states go through. it's, process of making that aid available. but the real hello t now for them is the concern that there could be a change in presidency. so whatever is agreed here potentially could get overturned if if it were donald trump got elected and took decided to withdraw the level of support he has for nato level of support that there is right now for ukraine. and i think that's why certainly for ukraine and certainly for the leaders here, the urgency they had around the table was really to get that age. that's built off the the frozen russian assets. their profits from those assets get that as alone in the hands of the ukrainian government by the end of this year, because there et, for that $50 billion would have been handed over to the ukrainians. and that's not something an incoming donald trump as president could then change. but everything else remains influx to a degree all right. >> nick, thank you so much. and we are awaiting remarks from president biden and ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyy. it is getting into the 8:00 p.m. our there and for sono, italy, it's going to be sort of an evening event here if they don't get underway soon so we'll be keeping an eye on that and bringing that to you as soon as it gets started. >> we're also tracking major news stateside a significant development in the battle over reproductive rights. the supreme court unanimously rejecting a challenge to how the fda regulates mifepristone, the abortion pill this means the drug remains on the market and can still be mailed to patients without requiring them to visit a doctor in person. >> this was a case that was brought by a group of doctors who are opposed to abortion. and in the court's opinion, justice brett kavanaugh wrote that citizens and doctors do not have standing to sue well, simply because others are allowed to engage in certain activities at least without the plaintiffs demonstrating how they would be injured by the government's alleged under-regulation of others we're joined now by cnn medical correspondent meg tirrell and cnn chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid. paula first to you, this decision comes the same month, two years ago that the court took away a woman's constitutional right to an abortion by overturning roe versus wade our significant is today's decision in that context. >> well, it's fascinating because this has been one of the big cases that we've been watching for its potential impact, right? on women who need this drug on the fda. it's regulatory powers, something that at the supreme court had opted to weigh in could have enormous implications for the entire pharmaceutical industry and other medical devices then also potentially impact on the 2024 race but they have effectively sidestep to this issue standing is a technical aspect of what you need to bring a case and they're saying that the people who brought this challenge did not have standing. they've not illustrated that they have an injury. if they have a complaint or a concern about and if a person stone justice kevin and the other justices suggested that they go color congress person to talk about legislative solutions or go through the executive branch. but this is not the way they can bring a case to the supreme court, but i fully expect that others who may have standing will try to challenge the same issue and then eventually the supreme court may opt to weigh in. but here they have preserve the status quo not shocking based on what we saw an oral arguments, but it's still possible that this issue could resurface at the supreme court in coming years. so now what we're watching for is their decision on another abortion case that is out there pending because remember, in the wake of their decision to overturn roe v. wade, now there were all these challenges, testing the limits of that decision, the trying to determine the contours of what exactly it means to send this down to the states. and that other case has to do with a challenge out of idaho and what do you do when you have a restrictive state laws and more permissive federal laws. so now that case arguably takes on an even greater significance yeah, it certainly does and meg, what are the practical implications here of this decision for women who are seeking abortion care well, mifepristone is one of two drugs used for medication abortion, which is the most common way that people access abortion in the us, that accounted for almost two thirds of abortions in 22 23 according to the guttmacher institute, there were more than 1 million abortions in that year. >> so that's more than 600,000 people who were accessing this medication. now, telehealth was a key issue here at this in this case, it wasn't that the supreme court, if it had ruled the other way, was necessarily going to take this drug completely off the market. but they were going to roll back how it could be used just including potentially making it so that you could not access it through telehealth. and 19% of abortions according to this data, which was as of the end of last year we're through telemedicine so that was a very important way that people access this drug. and it will continue to be so because nothing is going to change as a result of this ruling medication abortion is not legal in states where abortion is illegal, although people do access medication abortion through the mail and those states that same data. providers at about 40,000 people living in states with bands are restrictions, access to abortions from providers in states with shield laws for doctors and so people are still getting access to medication, abortion in this way, guys, this won't necessarily, well, this won't change anything, but we could see more challenges in the future mega, this case does have implications for the fda and the pharmaceutical industry more broadly, right? yeah, we saw friends of the court briefs published by the pharmaceutical industry and groups representing them because they were concerned that if a court could come in and essentially overturn an fda decision on a drug, then that could open up the entire system, whatever drugs people wanted to challenge, they could do it through this means. and so the pharmaceutical industry was really worried this could upend the entire industry really, and the gold standard of the regulatory process so they end statements today is sort of breathing a sigh of relief here. they are plotting this decision. we know that the fda and health and human services department also applauding the decision. but we could see more challenges still both to mifepristone and if it comes up through the same path way to the fda and to the drug industry as well all right, meg tirrell, thank you for that. >> thank you to paul as well. and still ahead, reproductive rights are also an issue right now on the senate floor, senate democrats forcing a vote on a bill that would guarantee access to ivf nationwide. right now, it is though likely to fail, will be joined by a democratic senator, tina smith with more what she hopes this accomplishes. >> the most anticipated moment of this election. and the stakes couldn't be higher. the president and the former president, one stage to vary different visions for america's future. the cnn presidential debate thursday, june 27th, nine live on cnn and streaming un-backed with cascade platinum plus, i have up my dish getting in that dishwasher, watching platinum plus gives you the highest standard of clean even in your machine. clean enough for you. >> yeah. >> it's great. >> bloat done cascade platinum plus recipes. recipes written by buyin, lost to time are now being analyzed and restored i'm using the power of delhi power e-trade award-winning trading app makes trading easier with it's customizable options chain, easy to use tools and pay for trading to help sharpen your skills, you can stay on top of the market from wherever you are e-trade morgan stanley, power e trades easy to use tools may complex trading less complicated custom scans hope you find new trading opportunities while an earnings tool helps you plan your trades and stay on top of the market. e-trade from morgan stanley was that trouble losing weight and keeping her same discover the power of week-old to the fbi gobi. i lost 35 pounds as some lost the war, 46 pounds when he go. >> and i'm keeping the weight off, we go be helped you lose weight and keep it off. >> i'm reducing my risk. >> we go v is the only fda approved for weight management medicine that's proven to reduce risk of major cardiovascular events and adults with known heart disease and with either obesity or overweight, we go v should be used for semaglutide or glp-1 medicines. don't take, we go via fewer. your family had medullary thyroid cancer multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome, type-2 or allergic to it, stopped. we go we and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction, serious side effects may happen including pancreatitis and gallbladder problems. we go we may cause low blood sugar and people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to treat diabetes, tell your provider about vision problems or changes, or if you've feel your heart racing while at rest depression or thoughts of suicide may occur. call your provider right away if you have any mental changes, common side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. >> would we go i'm losing weight keeping it off and i'm lowering my cv risks check your cost and coverage before talking to your healthcare professional about we go itch, scratch must not stop the sanity with cortisone, ten for bug bites, poison ivy, and other riches. >> cortisone ten is number one, doctor recommended. >> it works fast and lasts for hours the zone ten three, body serie a city client uses city's financial expertise to help drive its growth and keep its supply chain moving. some more pet parents can get everything they need right when they need it keeping more pets and families happy for the love of moving our clients forward, for the love of progress hi, i'm greg. >> i live in bloomington, illinois. i'm not an actor. i'm just a regular person. >> some people say, why should i take privilege and i don't have a problem with my memory. memory loss is not something that occurs overnight. i started noticing subtle lashes and memory. i want people to know that provision has worked for me itself. my memory itself, my cognitive qualities give it a try. i wanted to help you to get his helped me prevalent at stores everywhere without a prescription this is yeah, that looks totally safe brief first timer hot. let's was sure. >> it looks safe, but like nearly half of all us cars, it's been in an accident with garfield x.com. you see how accidents impact price. see you don't have to overpay on pause until accident. >> was space. >> here you're going to need it twins oh, that was too long of a pause shop with the facts at the all new car facts.com. >> i've hanako montgomery and tokyo and this cnn on capitol hill senate democrats have forced voting on a bill that would guarantee nationwide access to ivf in vitro fertilization treatments to help people conceive. >> it would enshrine federal protections for patients to get the treatment and for doctors to provide the treatment it would also block any state attempts to restrict access. today's vote comes just hours after the supreme court rejected a challenge to how the fda regulates the abortion pill mifepristone. their decision means the drug will stay on the market, at least for now. joining us now is democratic senator tina smith of minnesota, senator. thank you so much for being with us. critics have argued that this bill is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. they point to alabama where ivf clinics were shut down for a period, but state laws were changed and they were able to start up again. i'm wondering what's your the response to those who say it's unnecessary well, i would say tell that to the women who have been investing their physical and emotional and financial energies in to conceiving a child through in vitro fertilization only defined, you live in a place like alabama were suddenly your doctor would be considered committing homicide or manslaughter if the procedure went forward, right now in this country, there are something like 14 states where laws are pending that would essentially criminalize in vitro. >> so i say it is necessary and i also say that this is a very straightforward piece of legislation that we put forward at basically