>> sean: welcome to hannity as the political show trial is almost over closing arguments in the books and soon 12 jurors selected from 1 of the most anti- trumped districts in the entire country will decide the fate of donald trump pending appeal. today the prosecution asked a jurors differ caution to the wind and convict the former president of a crime they were never able to explain let alone prove in fact he wants the jury to handout 34 felony convictions based on what we have said from the beginning and novel legal theories surrounding a misdemeanor document labeling allegation well past statute of limitations of charge to a felony because of a mysterious election law violation never charged or prosecuted every -- anywhere else in america the convoluted case relies on a convicted liar admitted liar, a disbarred lawyer named michael cohen. we have talked in detail about the altar your motives of the judge and the lack of credibility from cohen and about a judge you should have recused himself but tonight another major story is emerging surrounding the judge as of the biden donating judge has placed basically cinderblocks on the scales of justice first attempting to silence donald trump with an unconstitutional gag order and allowed the prosecution to run wild with speculation and insinuate the court that trump was guilty of phantom election violations that weren't even charged or prosecuted. then had a kid shady cast of characters that the prosecution called to the stand to say whatever as stormy daniels and talk about ghosting dead people tell raunchy stories and did -- jokes that were no way relevant or material to the case the also allowed michael cohen the prophet from testimony in a kit according to the defense attorneys to lie on the stand repeatedly as at the defense gave up objecting because it was almost never sustained by the judge when it came to the defense the judge sustained almost every objection he has hamstring witnesses, yelling at trump's lawyers openly rebuking a witness in front of the jury. he is a distain for all things trump was palpable beginning to end but he is adherence to the law was nowhere to be found. by every measure it's a travis tree -- travesty injustice perpetrated by the judge. there's no credible evidence in this case of any crime committed by donald trump. the prosecution star witness was not just a thief but also an admitted convicted liar. as his attorney put it he is the mvp of liars in closing arguments they referred to him as the greatest liar of all time lying on his taxes to his bank investigation team and to a federal judge lying to congress on multiple occasions to his family as well as the media and during the current trial he was accused of lying on the stand during multiple occasions to keep in mind a nondisclosure agreement is not a crime paying a publication working with 1 like the national enquirer on what they call catch and kill about a story that is also not a crime. of the prosecution wants jurors to believe the way those payments were labeled was incorrect and illegal and some type of federal election fraud. the payments were to trump's attorney labeled illegal for expense because that's what they were ultimately burden of proof is supposed to be at the prosecution and they approved nothing. also wears the evidence that donald trump -- where is the intention he violated the law where is the evidence he committed an election violation why should anybody believe michael cohen was telling the truth this time. of course the judge well he's done his best to basically tipped the scales of justice with cinderblocks constantly giving prosecution whatever they want while severely limiting the defense around every turn. it's not justice in america this is law fair being waged by abiding loving prosecutor with the help of the biden donating judge to be decided by a jury in the borough of manhattan where biden got 90% of the vote no crime or evident over crime no credibility in the case of the jury could vote to convict simply because donald trump is on trial with the judge who want some convicted what did i safe in the beginning of the trial. donald trump can't get a fair trial in new york city regardless of outcome he didn't get a fair trial in new york city and for the record's estate is not worth $18 million closer to a billion or more according to the biden white house this is fair and equal justice nonpolitical and the biden campaign decided to have a campaign photo up in front of the courthouse joe wasn't there as they brought a 80-year-old robert de niro to yammer in rave and potato be a tough guy like he was in good fellows. >> we make room for clowns. we have them all over the city we tolerate it it's part of the culture not a person like trump. this government prepares from the earth. i don't mean to scare you maybe i do need to scare you if trump returns to the white house you can kiss these freedoms goodbye that we would all take for granted and elections forget about it as i can tell you right now he will never leave. >> sean: forget about it anyways like biden whose best years are behind him as he suffers from trumped arrangement syndrome. of the greatest threat to the republic the constitutional republic is not from the guy facing real prison time because of the political show trial instead of far left prosecutor and bureaucrats who can determine that system of justice to a political retribution with equal justice under the law be damned welcome to joe biden's america. here with more as he had some amazing observations today as the defense lived in the small neighborhood as with whatever erie they wanted to for our allegation with pure impunity as it was turned into a canned hound how is a juror supposed to question the charges when the jury starts with a dis- erroneous assumption how can that be in this country sounds like cinderblocks are put on the scales of justice by the judge wants an outcome. >> it's not that i haven't seen anything like this have an even read anything like that it was otherworldly as they were giving the benefit of doubt on many occasions which was outrageous. as the prosecutor said michael cohen can made it federal election violations as the gave instruction the jury isn't supposed to attribute the plea deal is an issue that towards trump so the defense rejected and it was just overruled and allowed the prosecutor to repeatedly state the federal election violations by trump are a fact there is not to the dispute to that and the judge sat there as a courtroom. elected him a sign he was even listening to the argument at 1 point prosecutor said hope hicks burst into tears because she knew they destroyed any defense by donald trump how do you knew know that. as the prosecutor basically started to testify and said to catch and kill techniques are used in this and it's beyond anything that media or political groups have ever done. that's not in the record he was giving testimony there's no estimate for experts for that hillary clinton killed cases in that election some of the most outrageous hoaxes were perpetrated by the hillary clinton campaign within enabling the media. many of the reporters listening helped her campaign do that. that's what was so otherworldly about today. i can't imagine a jury member going into deliberations and not assuming it's an established fact that federal election law violations occurred because they bother them to say it dozens of times. >> sean: you're saying the jury has been told dozens of times the payments were campaign violations the judge let that false claim stand uncontradicted now i don't know what to infer from that because i agree with you that hearing that and win the defense tried to object they were overruled almost every time until the end they got a bone thrown to them once or twice probably because the judge was tired but short of that it was allowed to be stated as fact. what does that mean not just for the jury but the outcome for a potential appeal if there was a conviction? >> some of what the prosecutor said i hope the jury views as it's obviously ridiculous at 1 point prosecutor said when michael cohen went into a bank to send a financial transaction and wrote something untrue that trump must have known that. how many clients know how their attorneys have a financial transfer and bank has the overextended they were. as the judges allowed this erroneous assumption to be reinforced. has they stopped illegal for expert as the start of the process -- proposition and would take a long way does this mean and so lead pipe cinch for conviction as they think there's a chance of a hung jury has the designation was made by a antiquated drop-down menu as this 1 gate with he referred to his not being brought in with h quoted trump it was cohen quoting trump's own hoping of the jurors 2 are saying look i think were being played for chumps here. >> sean: and allegations were led to be stated in court that are proven no facts to back it up no evidence either 1 of the more spectacular parts of the prosecution's closing arguments was how much they spent rehabilitating his devastating testimony literally saying you can't blame him for sowing trump and joe merchandise or making money and millions of dollars reading books send a podcast or admitting he hates trump wants him in jail he felt like he was done dirty is a phrase used at 1 point that the security guard at coded language for the 1 minute 362nd call and literally allowed the whole narrative to go forward about michael cohen and i'm sitting here going it's okay for michael cohen to lie on the stand make money off donald trump and you are going to excuse that away as the prosecutor and admit to committing a crime robbing him? >> that's a bizarre thing because prosecutors rebuilt is stormy daniels and said she wasn't really out for the money she was trying to protect her family and it was an extortion really? she demanded more money from trump and it was a holdup let me remind her audience while you're talking output her letter up. >> according to the prosecutor's she was the innocent victim pulled into the vortex of donald trump and i think jurors must have been laughing under their breath and then when it came to cohen would assume the jurors would be insulted here's the letter you are referring to write and it's clear this was a holdup operation when cohen came up they pretrade him like he was pushing some cart down the street to support his family saying he did this to support his family he had no money he lives in a multimillion condo in the trump building making over $2 million he selling merchandise and some of these jurors who live in the real world and have jobs might be a little bit insulted like just give us a break you can't pretrade this guy is desperately trying to feed his family from his penthouse condo. >> sean: a long day for you jonathan thanks for joining us. here with reaction from the trump campaign is a twain 24 national press secretary at the courtroom today was get your take on the events today follow what the professor said there. >> it was a dumpster fire for the biden campaign they wake -- will go to headline that they are a full-blown freak out over his failing in desperate campaign and a couple hours later they showed up to the criminal courthouse in manhattan the joe biden spokesperson held a press conference all but conceding the entire case comes from the top it comes from crooked joe biden using alvin as far left prosecutor because no other prosecutor in america in their right mind would proceed with the case other than alvin bragg who has trumped arrangements in german who was the star guest outside the courthouse? robert de niro and out of touch elitist actor from hollywood because those are the only people left to support joe heiden -- joe biden and he went on a tirade you know what he didn't mention the real problem is americans are facing the fact they are petrified about the weapon eyes government that joe biden is leading the fact inflation is robbing them of thousands of dollars every single month as it's allowed to leave her nose and terrorists into our great country as the campaign was was outside and inside the courtroom the george soros funded prosecution photo imploded it took them 4 hours to do they've been doing legal gymnastics as save they spent 6 weeks of their life listening from george soros team joe biden's team, the judge was overseen at all. >> sean: as we're talking about in detail all the information coming out there they the jury was told dozens of times payments for campaign violations the judge let that false claim without any evidence go uncontradicted in the case wants your take on that. >> it's unbelievable to witness the sheer bias of the judge and every time our defense team proposes an objection he overrules it has all the patients in the road for the part prosecution and as the professor pointed out he denied a key witness in the case who would have proved there was no federal campaign violation that's why they didn't bring the case up in the first place why joe biden's justice department even passed on the case as did his predecessor in the da office they all passed on this case because there is no crime. the judge knows that and he is a highly conflicted judge for reasons trump can to talk about because he imposed an unconstitutional gag order on the president because he doesn't want him to expose the truth about the corruption. >> sean: that's why he didn't step in and stop this uncontradicted false narrative going forward in closing arguments today outrageous young anything of ever heard or seen in my life. thank you now with more on today's closing arguments foxbusiness correspondent lydia with us in the trial today is watching you earlier what a day you had your. >> a long day not just for us covering the trial but for the jurors. i heard the point made by a prior guest about the length of the trial six-week a testimony so to think about that from the perspective of jurors setting your own life aside for 6 weeks to hear about the case then finally today starting your day at 9:30 in the morning with closing arguments from the defense and ending 8:00 pm tonight closing arguments from the prosecution wrapping up you do have to wonder is the jury hearing all this information particularly from the prosecution and they're winding long painstaking closing argument and is the jury concluding well they are saying a lot so it must be important or is it the reverse they are saying a lot and i really wish this would be over we'll see what happens tomorrow with that for all involved. >> sean: any feel for the jury in the courtroom as i didn't have the opportunity to lay that on that as in the main courtroom the same day stormy daniel gave the stand as it captivated the attention that is the purpose of putting her on the standby prosecution she has nothing to do with falsified documents which we should remind everybody that's what the case is about she had a salacious story dick tell an agency interested. >> all the salacious material none of it relevant none of it material to but the jury gets prejudiced by such we appreciate it more in closing arguments and trumps new york case we checkmate the legal panel later on laura trump is in the courtroom all day will get her take straight ahead. our founder, johnny morris and his dad knew this first hand, they created a boat that was more affordable... tracker, the world's #1 one best selling fishing and pontoon boats powered by mercury. proudly built in missouri and sold factory direct at bass pro shops and select dealers. for as little as 5 dollars a day... you can own a brand new tracker and make lifelong memories of your own. bass pro shops. voted america's best outdoor retailer. save even more and support conservation when you join the club. people couldn't see my potential. so i had to show them. i've run this place for 20 years, but i still need to prove that i'm more than what you see on paper. today i'm the ceo of my own company. it's the way my mind works. i have a very mechanical brain. why are we not rethinking this? i am more... i'm more than who i am on paper. >> sean: both defense and prosecution have delivered closing arguments what kind of impact do they have in the jury as we have gregg jarrett and harvard law professor good to see you both starting with you is 1 thing i found interesting is the judge allowing this false claim by the prosecution to be brought in again and again and again uncontradicted in the judge allowing the prosecution to read unrelated quotes from that book why would they allow that in with the stuff overruled the prosecution just accuse donald trump of threatening witnesses the objection was overruled even on that at some point you have to say cinderblocks and i guess bricks on the scales of justice in the case by the judge. >> 1 in a long list of reversible errors by the judge and in the history of american law never has a defendant been tried on an unidentified charge no ethical prosecutor would ever do that no fair or competent judge would ever allow it because every defendant has a right to be informed of the accusations against them it's guaranteed and the sixth amendment but even now nobody, leased it all the jury knows for sure and it's 1 of the many reversible errors committed by the judge i think the fix was in from the outset the case was a rig by and scrupulous da and bias to judge and together they worked to engineer an absurd legal erie that would never withstand illegal for they know it but their goal is to get a wrongful conviction to delegitimize trump's candidacy they contorted the law manipulate the justice system the create an illusion of wrongdoing and the end it would justify any means. sadly it's now up to the jury to correct a manifest injustice and nobody knows how it will go. >> sean: and how would they possibly know when they weren't given an opportunity to hear about the law from anybody other than the judge who obviously is a real bias against trump and if that wasn't apparent up until now it certainly was apparent today the biden donor judge wants your reaction? >> no question he wants to have it both ways he says the question of whether or not it was a violation of campaign contributions which there wasn't is a question of fact then he denies the right to approve that fact and it puts the burden of proof on the defense is under new york law the prosecution does not have the burden of proof when it comes to closing arguments defense goes first what is the defense supposed to do? the constitution doesn't have to assert anything it is no burden of going forward or proof when you tell the defense to go first the implication to the jury is the defense must disprove the case without even knowing what it is then, yeah, these gaping holes in the prosecution of the case. a prosecutor misled the jury by saying the testimony is corroborated they were 2 points in his testimony which are crucial. number 1 the meeting in which he and this other guy concocted this plot no corroboration with that and seconded that the phone call where there is a complain about the 14-year-old kid harassing co- when there is a witness to that and i hope the judge would give the missing witness instruction there wasn't enough from the defense in my view but the judge should have said the burden is on the prosecution they must prove that at 1 or both of those meetings there was a plot and there's no cooperative corroboration to the it's all dependent on the testimony from cohen there were 2 who could testify but the prosecution didn't call them and you should infer from the fact the prosecution could've called them but didn't. if they had called them the testimony would have been unfavorable to the prosecution if the judge fails to give that instruction its reversible error 1 of