over. >> this is a case it should have been brought. we will be appealing this scam. >> it is irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged, just because they do not like the verdict. shannon: has the verdict playing with voters? >> i think it's a complete failure of our justice system. >> the system of justice works big boxes what is of the person former u.s. imprint president convicted of a crime will ask our illeg legal pam about tom's prospects on appeal and the possibility of jail time get reaction from biting sarah get ro khanna and senator tim scott. what will it mean for down ballot races come november? i see you going to tell your candidates to talk about this? what city to be prepared and they all agree this is been a sham at trial. bill: has exclusive for montana with senators steve daines head of the republican group trying to flow control be set and are r sunday panel on why chief justice declined an invitation to new democrats over the alito flag controversy. then, world leaders prepare to mark 80 years since allied troops stormed the beaches of normandy. >> indeed day it's argued with him a single important in the last century. not just for the united states but for western civilization. shannon: all this week on vaccination. shannon: hello from foxnews in washington. president trump racing tens of millions of dollars in new donations and planning to appeal his criminal conviction. his legal team and juggles of several other state and federal cases none of them likely to be resolved before the november election for speaking out this weekend an exclusive interview with fox and friend on the fox news channel. >> i did absolutely nothing wrong but i mean absolutely, think of it. i hate what they say bookkeeping, this and that it is not. think of it expense i use the word expense, legal expense. i pay a lawyer, a bookkeeper without ever speaking to me because they did the right thing he wawho has been with me for y. in other words they paid a legal expense is marked down as a legal expense and they said that is a fraud. >> ain a moment house speaker mike johnson joins us with a reaction to the verdict and to news the president is expected to announce executive actions on the border by tuesday. but first, what is next to president trump and his legal team as hunter biden's federal gun trails had to kick off on monday? let's break it down with george washington university law prlawprofessor jonathan turley a fox news and assistant district attorney tom depree. fancy meeting you here at. [laughter] we are packed together to talk about what happens still to come. could trump go to prison and deciding the sentence the judge may away the underlying seriousness of the charges due to their ties to the 2016 lection as well as the decision to go to trial or accept responsibility by pleading guilty. jonathan, you and i spent a lot of time at this courthouse watching this whole thing play out with anything surprise you from a judge merchan? >> and noel. after watching him in court the very concept of jail for something like this would be otherworldly and ridiculous. after watching in the courtroom i must say i have some doubts in my mind. it would go against the overwhelming weight of past cases. you've got a nonviolent offense by a first offender, elderly defendant. i will be very surprised. there is a menu of other options from committee service, to home confinement. the dismissals what most judges are thinking of it. basically go out and sin no more type of warning. you are still under supervision. if you commit an offense they get really tough on you. if he does go with something that is like community service or confining him to trump tower trump could get a suspension pending appeal from a higher court. then they away into the calculation for judge merchan. shannon: is talk about appeal but that's coming. some of the best bright spots for the trump legal team on that front. stormy daniels testimony of the statute itself, the vagueness of the underlying crime, the fact defense expert witness brad smith or severely limited in what they should say. that presidential immunity we are all waiting for the supreme court. when you think is the best option on appeal? seventeen number of options at their disposal pit may be the best what is challenging the notion the fraud, misdemeanor dissent distant legal and put i. presto they have 34 felonies. the jury was instructed on those long thin difficulty grappling with the instructions. i suspect the trump legal team is going to come out pretty hard on the idea there was an underlying predicate crime that was sufficient to convert this from a misdemeanor to a felon. this argument on the exclusion of the bulk of their expert thet testimony i think the trump legal team the jury needed to understand the ins and outs of election law in order to decide this case that prevented us and put on the testimony we need to hear. shannon: hindsight is 20/20 how the prosecution to come with te defense did, how trump's team blew it this aghast essay it's an opinion piece but they write this, set up telling a simple story mr. trump's defense of the hap hazard of denials and personal attacks that failed to focus the jury on that weaknesses in the prosecution's case. anyone and everyone against little by doing so. jonathan, your response to that? >> was always monday morning quarterback imprint of talk to some members of the defense team they feel the best that they could. and quite frankly you could have been clarence darrow and loss this case. i was hoping for a hung jury for this is a hung jury or conviction case. once instruction schema is almost guaranteed for conviction for there is not a lot of room there. this is what i tell people he should not blame the jury necessarily paid those obstructions were a poison pill instruction set. they left very little room for the jury they were told over and over again there were violations in this case they were ordered by trump. they objected to that and judge merchan overruled every one of those. but they heard in the courtroom is not too surprising in terms of a conviction rate did create this target rich environment for appeal. that appeal is likely to play out after the election. but for most americans it was obviously divided sbr politically. this is something we are not used to. for many of us is was a political prosecution. and in my view we have not had this type of politicalization of the criminal justice system since jon adams. it has really been an awakening for many people looking at this and saying maybe this is where our rage is taking us? we have to look again at what we are becoming at this will be the new norm. shannon: for republicans to respond in kind to do it they accuses democrats of doing here which is using the legal system for political purpose we will discuss the calls for that and where they go if that's her best strategy. meanwhile i want to make sure we hit on the hunter biden's case. that gun case unless there is a last-minute deal, goes to trial starting tomorrow with jury selection. when one of the filings d.o.j. talks about what they like to include as evidence. the defendant laptop is real. it will be introduced as a trial exhibit and contain significant evidence of the defendant's guilt. moreover the evidence on his laptop is corroborated by independent sources including witnesses bits corroborated by the defendant's own admissions in his book. this is both a legal and political headache for the biden family. >> oh for sure. this throws getting fascinating to watch play out for the justice department sang hunter biden basically light on these forms he filled out when he went to go buy a firearm. what they're going to used to prove their case is his own testimony in his own book or he talks about how you struggling with addiction. they're going to be calling people very close to his friends, his family, who are also going to testify he was addicted to controlled substances of the time he filled out these forms of the time he possessed the firearm. i've seen the defense argument, i do not find them very persuasive for the going to argue that even though he was addicted, maybe he didn't know he was addicted. i don't find that persuasive it is going to be fascinating to the justice department forward with the prosecution next week. cook so much of what we've have heard this week, this year's the campaign would clad in courtrooms and not necessarily on the campaign trail. we will watch this one and pick your brains again very soon. appreciate your time. we turn to the middle east there's news overseas cautious hopes and israeli plan could finally get the hostages still pelt and cause a home for their loved ones or fox news foreign correspondent and trey yingst is on the ground with the very latest on negotiations as the clock is ticking. cooks a good morning. we are closely monitoring developments out of the middle east amid reports of a possible cease fire. present biden laid out a plan for a proposal that if accepted will be implemented in three stages for the first stage would see a six week a pause in the fighting with israeli troops withdrawing from causes major cities. female and wounded israeli hostages for palestinian prisoners for the second stage would lead to full negotiated cease-fire a third stage would involve a major reconstruction effort in gaza the release of dead israelis are being held by hamas. qatar negotiators relate all these details of the plan to have bos us in a statement to hs news that resistance movement the positive the views was included in the speech of u.s. president joe biden for the president urges really hard letters to accept this agreement and bring an end to that war per there is growing anticipation about the fate of this proposal. understanding it is a last ditch effort amid a failed diplomatic efforts. back to you. shannon: trey yingst in israel thank you so much for charlie to speak about this and much more speak of ho house mike johnson d speaker johnson welcome back to "fox news sunday" precooked strait to be with you as always. shannon: a star in the middle east. we try to get something to the floor that deals with the icc. international bodies are condemning the prime minister. their case asking for arrest warrants it. it seems like the white house was interested in doing something that would push back on the icc. now it seems they have changed course. that's not going to be the case. house of foreign affairs mike mccall said we want something that can become a law but we are not interested in a messaging bill. it sells at this bipartisan agreement for the icc. the segment we are getting from the white house not what can you pass you think the president might sign? >> we hope to determine that by this afternoon for these negotiations have been ongoing with her democratic colleagues. we are working very hard as chairman mccaul indicated there. we do not want this to just be a political exercise. we think it is important for republicans and democrats to stand together and send a message of the international community the abuses of the international criminal court, the icc cannot be allowed to go forward. the idea president biden would backtrack on that. he would disagree with us. we should impose sanctions on icc officials when they are threatening to arrest and the defense minister of israel and their war for survival is to us unconscionable. help the white house is a light on this. we have got to do this. we need to do it next week. my intention is to bring that legislation to the floor if we have to do a republicans only we will. i certainly hope the democrats will come along with us on this. shannon: you dig it democrats to come along on the invitation to pry minister netanyahu to come speak and address congress but you dig it chuck schumer and hakeem jeffries to join when it seemed like they may not at one point. not everyone is excited including independent senator bernie sanders. he said it's a very sad day that prime minister benjamin tran was been invited by leaders from both parties to address a joint meeting of the u.s. congress. netanyahu he calls in a war crime is not going to attend. it does in a fuller same to israel's got a right to defend itself but not to kill tens of thousands of civilians, destroyed universities, hospitals, homes. how do you respond to his characterization? >> bernie sanders is parroting the talking points of hamas and the ayatollah and i run. at that as a side he wants to choose, so be it for a democrat colleagues have to make a choice are they going to stand with our most important alley in the middle east at this most desperate time as has been traditionally the case. in washington we had bipartisan agreement we have to stand in solidarity with israel but are they going to take the new side and stand with her boss? and the ayatollah? bernie sanders' choke was chosen a side of her other colleagues will stand up into the right thing we desperately need it. israel desperately needs it. he is deeply concerned we did issue the invitation for the joint address to congress but i'm very grateful it finally went out for it i would note i sent the address of the of the letter back in mid march 2 chuck schumer. took them quite some time to agree. we've finally gotten that done. and i hope that we can get that scheduled here in the coming weeks. shannon: i want to sl use the trauma verdict and talk to that quickly would ask what the news this morning we come from the white house and the president is going to take executive action on the border. you've been pushing him to do that for a long time. we do not know what it is yet but do you give him credit at least for taking that step kuester. >> i don't to produce too little too late. he signed a decibel show the american people somehow he wants her address the issue that he himself created. we documented 64 specific executive actions present biden secretary mayorkas at dhs took over the course the last three and half years beginning on the first day that president biden took office. to open the border, why question of the did it intentionally and has had catastrophic effects upon our country will be living with for decades to come. now he was issued executive order to show oh no he really does care about the issue for the only reason they do that. because the polls say is the biggest issue in america. i receive is a border state. travel to over 29 states and done events and 117 cities as of yesterday by the last six months. there's an energy out there. people are motivated the first question that comes up in almost every public form is what about the open border? why the world would present biden allow it question he did more than allow it he engineered it. everybody knows that. shannon: suit spins out as early as tuesday of this week. clearly it you think it's a travesty as many people do. i think having watched the trout there aren't many grounds, fertile territory for the trump team to use on appeal. that's going to take time. this a number of republicans out there saying you guys seem to turn around and do the same thing. jon, you write in this are problems have to bring charges against democratic officers, even presidents. only retaliation in kind can produce the deterrents necessary to enforce a political version of mutual absurd destruction for the other side pegging you and writing about how high the temperature is up and says this appeared we have to ease up. we have to stop enjoying our hate so much but we cannot go on indefinitely like this. are you or rate republicans will be perceived within the very thing you are accusing democrats of, of using that legal system for political purposes? >> here is what i believe it. we are the rule of law party. chaos is not a conservative value and we have to fight back and we will. with everything in our arsenal but we do that within the confines of the rule of law. we believe in our institutions we are conservatives and trying to conserve the greatest country in the history of the world for its institutions are an important part of that. our system of justice is an important part of that. we will do with our tools in congress and the houses we will use our oversight responsibility boo vardy done that. judiciary jim jordan issue request for alvin bragg, the d.a. and manhattan and that lead prosecutor to show up for hearing on june 13 in our select committee on the weaponization of the federal government because that is what they have done for the purpose of the hearing is to investigate what these prosecutors are doing at the state and federal level to use of politics. political retribution go after political opponents and federal officials like donald trump. that is a really important thing for us to delve into and we are going to look at special counsel jack smith who we believe authority as well. of t mechanisms to control for that. it's at jurisdiction i think that can have the deserved effect and show the american people were not going to tolerate this at the end of the day listening faith in the system of justice itself that's a serious threat. shannon: are almost out of time i wei want to quickly ask you at something that may need clarification you set on freight the supreme court should step in the justices on the court i know many of them pu person they are deeply concerned. now, or the critics out there one who covers the court with me part of the supreme court press corps wrote this he said fascinating to hear the gop speaker and has admitted to having private conversations with multiple justices who expressed concern to him about trump's conviction but i'm sure those justices will recuse them and eventual appeal to avoid sitting on a case they prejudged i did not take your comments mean that specific conversation but i want to give you a chance to clarify. >> no, think of course i've not had conversations with the justices spread know their character, their personality. note that said in the past with a deeply concerned as we are about maintaining system of justice. chiseled on the marble above the front doors equal justice under law. they are concerned about maintaining that idea paid we all are it's a necessary ingredient to keep a constitutional republic that is what i was referring to. i think they are concerned about using court rooms for politics and political retribution but we all are, we all should be, every american. that is what i was referring to in their heart of hearts they are concerned about just like we are. shannon: will see the trump team will take more expedited route get to the justices and see how it plays out. thank you for your time. >> thanks jana, appreciate you. shannon: up next we have congressman ro khanna and center tim scott talking polls, campaigns and shifting positions for both candidates, next. for both candidates, next. - wounded warrior project has been with me every step of my journey. - they've helped me realize it's possible to rise to the top again. - it's possible to get the help i need for me and my family. - it's possible to hate pushups again. - to feel understood. - to begin healing both inside and out. - to feel like myself again. - and now i know anything is possible. (gentle music) - [narrator] wounded warrior project helped me find the strength to go further than i ever thought possible. - [narrator] i was able to come outta my shell and really connect with others. - [narrator] so i can feel like part of a team, part of the community again. - [narrator] it's possible to live better. - [narrator] it's possible to have a voice and to be heard. - [narrator] to feel understood. - [narrator] to find peace. - because i've experienced firsthand that anything is possible. (inspirational music) >> the good news is that i think we have set a record beyond all records for fundraisi