see you next time. >> sean: welcome to this special edition of hannity. tonight, violent far left right ripping through american cities all while anti-semitism is on the rise. we have the shocking examples all coming up but first the 2024 elect year is less than a year away. democrats are running scared and in all likelihood, yep, 80-year-old joe bide listen be the party's nominee. democrats then will be forced to face a pretty uncomfortable truth and that is that joe has massive problems, and not just his declining physical and cognitive health or his vast policy failures, no, tonight the drugs claims against the president and his family. they are very, very real. multiple house and senate investigations have already detailed what is an extensive money trail, all exposing the flow of foreign cash right into biden family bank accounts. now, according to multiple witnesses and whistleblowers, emails and texts, the bidens were selling access and influence to joe biden. the big guy, hunter's father, was taking a cut. we knew about this corruption well before the 2020 election. now, the let, the media mob, they can no longer censure the truth. big tech, remember, they were humiliated and twitter or x, that's now under new ownership. the federal government includes bad actors in the fbi, the doj, and the cia. they were all exposed in terms of being politicized and weaponized, enduring testimony, while an fbi official was forced to admit that hunter's laptop was, in fact, very authentic and they knew it but they were warning big tech companies you might be the victim of a misinformation campaign and it might be about hunter and joe biden. all in an effort to seem fair biden's doj, looking for a fall guy or a sacrificial lamb, who could shield biden from charges while taking the blame. according to fake news cnn hunter has real cause for concern tonight. take a look. >> how significant do you think this is? >> it's bad news for hunter bibite -- biden. now he potentially is looking at a second indictment out of california. if we think about the potential tax charges here it's important to keep in mind, when hunter biden went into court a few months with doj they had a deal that he would plead guilty to misdemeanor tax offenses. they agreed that he had failed to pay over a million dollars in income taxes that he owed, so assuming, which is a fair assumption, that doj has evidence of that, that feels like the minimum charges he may face. it may get worse. >> sean: after attempting to let hunter go away, and letting serious tax violations expire, and pass the statue of limitations, and after that egregious attempt at that sweetheart plea deal that failed, and now the doj is uning dangerously low on credibility so now hunter is in big trouble but it's not about hunter, is it? it's about his dad. nothing that could connect his misdeeds to the big guy that evidence is growing by the day. for example, we have an attorney general, his name is merrick garland, he has a weaponized doj. the president's adult son is currently facing felony gun charges. tax indictments could very soon be on the horizon. you even heard from it a pro biden-cnn attorney. a grand jury in california has been impanelled, remember the whole controversy over david weiss. he said he didn't have authority to charge in places like washington, d.c. and dallas. garland said he did have it. now he's a special counsel. however, during the years, they throughout the statue to expire. meanwhile, prosecutors have called numerous witnesses including hunter's uncle, and an occasional business associate, joe's brother, jim biden. now, i don't know what will become of all of the tax cases we do know hunter's finances are shady. despite making millions of dollars from the biden brand i doubt it was hunter, the biden brand, i'm sure it was pop's, hunter regularly had trouble making ends meet but in 2020, when joe became the democratic nominee, many of hunter's financial woes vanished. thanks to, of course, the generosity from wealthy democratic donors, and a name that keeps coming up is a guy by the name of kevin morris. so according to a new report, investigation by justnews.com, solomon, he details how he collected $6 million when his father began running for president. not just one person but all people that supported joe biden. they are saying much of this may have come from kevin morris. so how did hunter spent this money? a five figure monthly rent of a california home, large child support payments, some travel, many legal bills, federal and local tax debts, totaling more than $2 million. why does hunter have all these rich friends just willing to give him money? in a statement, lawyer for kevin morris, the guy whose name keeps coming up, a potential source for these claims, a campaign of harassment against mr. morris. time will tell. the statement continues, this individual has only disclosed certain information to cause mr. morris public embarrassment and may have outright misrepresented facts and statements about mr. morris as part of this campaign of "harassment." not sure what this means. who is harassing mr. morris, we don't know. meanwhile, john solomon reporting that no one, not even joe biden's brother, jim, seemed to know why this individual and others were potentially giving hunter so much money, but now, of course, house investigators, they would like to know more. they have now requested an interview from the attorney who they say may have bank rolled hunter's lifetime for years, so is this going to have any implications for hunter's tax case or joe biden him. here with the very latest, an investigative reporter, editor and chief, john solomon, i know this guy's name keeps coming up and di read your investigative piece, and they seem to be claiming on their end that somehow kevin morris, if, in fact, he was giving money to hunter biden that, in fact, he's a victim in all of this, and a victim of harassment, a victim of docking, which should never happen so i'm trying to understand, has the oversight committee verified that money was specifically given, have they traced the bank records, for example? >> well, one of the most important pieces of evidence that i made public today is actually embedded in the story is a transcript from the arkansas fraternity case that got settled this june. in there the judge talks openly about these loan agreements. they are called promissory notes and they total about $5.3 million. the money starts flowing in 2020 when joe biden is trying to become the nominee against donald trump and they continue all the way until the end of 2022 at least what i can tell from the reporting that i've done. the judge was asking me, if someone gave me a lot of money i would want to know why. get me more information about the promissory note. that's about the time the case got settled and we got caught off from what was going on in court. congress has been interviewing witnesses and giving information. the irs and fbi looked at this extensively. in fact, agents said maybe this money should be looked at as an illegal gift accepted by joe biden's campaign because it would have benefitted his campaign. how is it? because biden had a big tax lien over his let, and they didn't want that to come out in the campaign. so they pitched that to the delaware u.s. attorney. turned down. they pitched it to somebody in the u.s. attorney's office, got turned down. when the foreign money got shut off for hunter biden in 2019, that's when it shuts off, it's what the prosecutors said in the plea deal a new source of money comes in to keep biden's money afloat. that's kevin morris, $1 million in gross sales of his art paintings that go to at least a dozen people that i can track, you few or three of them are people associated with the democratic party. kevin morris himself, bought one of the paintings according to the court record that's sitting in the public domain. everybody has been asking this question. now we have some answers. >> sean: a promissory note basically is a loan. my understanding is, if you lend large sums of money like that, doesn't that have to be recorded. don't you have to charge interest? doesn't there have to be a record of that? otherwise, wouldn't that be considered a gift, or are you suggesting that maybe people bought maybe hunter's paintings, and maybe that was a way to wink, nod, do you believe that possibly could have happened? >> listen, i think there are legitimate art sales. people decide, are they really great art? that's in the eyes of the beholder. but there are some legitimate art sales done, people bought the art, paid a certain amount of money, somewhere between $13,000 or $70 or $80,000 for a single painting. one went for $875,000 for a bundle of paintings. those are legit. there are specific documents, promissory notes that have the specific details. i report that the loan has a 5% interest rate. that they don't become due, that hunter doesn't need to start making payments until 2025, one year after biden's re-election chance. notes are due or payments are due in october, 2025, under the documents that the fbi, irs, and congress have learned about. there is paper. i think the terms of this deal will get looked at by congress. kevin morris will be asked to come in. i got some breaking news, james biden just agreed after thanksgiving to submit to a voluntary interview before congress. he had been subpoenaed. they have arranged for that. james comey says he's very pleased that the uncle of biden will come in. james biden made a comment to the irs, i have that document, he said, i don't know what kevin morris is up to. i don't know why he's giving so much money to hunter biden. the biden family, the arkansas judge, the chuay'kong, fbi, have all been asking questions about this deal. tonight people can see what the facts are and then they can make up their own mind. >> sean: john solomon, editor and chief. joining us now with more reaction, the author of a brand-new explainer for the u.s. constitution, and other patriotic documents. amazon.com, hannity.com. along with allen dershowitz and former acting u.s. attorney general matt whittaker. this promissory note part is less impressive to me because if there is paperwork, if it was a loan that would be perfectly legal and legitimate, i'm assuming, matt whittaker. the issue to me is, what we've now found and discovered, and what we're hearing from james comber, that there are all of these suspicious activity reports, all of these shell corporations they have identified, all of these tens of millions of dollars, that the biden family members were receiving, including grandchildren. the money seems to be shuffled from company-to-company but the companies don't seem to have any purpose. like providing goods or services that we can ascertain. the question is why was this family being paid tens of millions of dollars, and seemingly, we can find no work that they offered in exchange for that? then you go to devin archer's testimony, which is number one, joe biden did talk to the foreign business partners of hunter. at least 20 times that he knows of. we know about the meetings at cafe milano, and then the question becomes, you know, was this access, you know, was this to play for access here, especially, you cannot identify any services rendered. >> yes, sean, this is a really good way for the biden family to support itself because you see the people that are getting the loans, the people that are getting the money, the people that the beneficiaries of all of these llc's and wire transfers, all are in the biden family, and this is how joe, it appears, figured out how to take care of his family. on a meager salary of a senator, of a vice president, and now president, you can't support all of these folks, but what you can do is you can structure these transactions, have your son and your brother out there, that are conducting business, because of their relationship with you, and their familial relationship with you, and so it's very clear to me, we would call this organized crime, in any other context but the biden family business and that's what concerns me the most. this is exactly the way organized crime has structured their deals, and this lack of curiosity by the department of justice is incredibly disappointing to say the least but, you know, at some point in time this entire story will be revealed and it's disgusting. >> sean: let's get your take professor dershowitz here. look, can we identify any services rendered for the money that james comer, the how's oversight committee is talking about, because they are talking about tens of millions of dollars. i don't see any services rendered, do you? >> no, and if there were, he wouldn't be qualified to render them. there are two big questions. number one, does the special counsel for hunter biden have jurisdiction beyond hunter biden that would extend to the president of the united states? if not there, ought to be a special counsel appointed to investigate beyond hunter biden. the hunter biden part of it is only a small part. look, john solomon is great investigative reporter. i found that his conclusions are almost always validated, and there is enough smoke here to appoint a really distinguished, outside the justice department, not somebody who is in the justice department, special, special counsel, to look at the relationship between hunter biden, joseph biden, joseph biden's brother, entire family, i'm a democrat, i hope they clear him. if i were joe biden, i would want a special counsel because there is so much smoke but the american public has the right to an investigation. not done by the justice department, and not done by republicans in congress, but done by a special independent person who has great integrity. we want to know the truth. >> sean: okay. but the problem is i don't believe we've had that, craig jarratt. david weiss, we had the conflicting, he even was conflicted himself. he gave one story to lindsey graham, one story to jim jordan about whether he had authority to bring charges in jurisdictions like d.c. and california. then, of course, he becomes special counsel. but he's also the guy that let the statute of limitations pass. we now know robert, in fact, is not going to pursue any charges on the issue of top secret classified documents, and that joe biden is only going to get a stern lecture just like hillary clinton got away with it, but they raid mar-a-lago. i'm not sure if he's able to appoint the type of prosecutor that professor dershowitz is referring to. >> i don't trust them at all. particularly david weiss. i think he's part of the protection racket run by merritt garland and to some extend the fbi for the bidens. the news broke yesterday that weiss has agreed to convene a grand jury in los angeles, california, central district, looking into potential tax evasion and tax fraud. apparently ignoring money laundering, and bribery statutes. but nevertheless, this strikes me as a potential charade by david weiss. i mean, this is the guy who tore up an agreement to bring six serious felony charges against hunter biden. gave him immunity in a sweetheart plea deal. it was only a federal judge that forced him to bring the gun charges and it appears that congress, by uncovering incriminating evidence to force a grand jury in cal but i'm not fooled by this. a grand jury is secret. if a guy like wis is the prosecutor, presents apathetic case and feeble evidence, and doesn't push for an indictment, in fact, stands idly by and doesn't say one way or another or not so subtly tells the grand jurors don't do it, like a hand sandwich, they won't indict. this strikes me as a potential farce here and window dressing so he can say, oh, gee, i tried but it was those grand jurors. >> on a scale of one to 10, based on all we know about joe lying, never talked to his son, brother, anybody for that matter, about foreign business deals, knowing this testimony, that, in fact, he participated in calls, knowing about barisma, knowing about the what's app message, how much legal trouble is joe biden likely in, in a scale of one to 10, matt whittaker? >> i think he has very low exposure to any criminal culpability but certainly he has a lot of political liability right now. >> sean: what about impeachment, scale of one to 10? >> i think it's pretty high. i was just with chairman smith today. i think they are doing a deliberate investigation and they are going to have the goods to impeach before this congress ends. >> professor? >> here's my idea, let the house judiciary committee controlled by justice department give lays of names and let the attorney general pick from that list of 10 names. >> sean: he'll never do it. ever. not this a.g. he's been politicized. >> have a special counsel here. i think the odds on impeachment here are zero. but the odds on some kind of criminal liability are a three or four. i would like to reduce it to a zero but i want to see a real independent, some former college university president. >> sean: i hear what you're saying, i don't think that's going to happen. we've got -- greg, you get the last word. >> the record is replete with instances of joe biden aiding and abetting the influence ped peddling influence of his son, the media misses the point, no money went to joe. it doesn't have to. if you confer a benefit in exchange for money to another person or entity other than yourself, that is -- >> sean: one to 10, one to 10, legal liability, impeachment liability? >> well, legal liability with the department of justice, next to zero. i agree it a high probabilities of impeachment. >> sean: professor dershowitz, i know your heart is in the right place. the attorney general, they have been weaponized, sad to say. biden continues to embarrass our country with his break foreign policy. former secretary of state mike pom fame owe, he weighs in coming up straight ahead. this is how it feels to du more with less asthma... ...thanks to dupixent. dupixent is not for sudden breathing problems. it's an add-on treatment for specific types of moderate-to-severe asthma. and can help improve lung function for better breathing in as little as two weeks. dupixent helps prevent asthma attacks... and can even reduce or eliminate oral steroids. imagine that. dupixent can cause allergic reactions that can be severe. get help right away if you have rash, chest pain, worsening shortness of breath, tingling or numbness in your limbs. tell your doctor about new or worsening joint aches and pain, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma medicines, including steroids, without talking to your doctor. who knows what you can do when you du more with less asthma. ask your doctor about dupixent. the most prescribed biologic for asthma. (car engine revs) (engine accelerating) (texting clicks) (tires squeal) (glass shattering) (loose gravel clanking) >> this is a fox news update. i'm kevin in washington. former first lady roslyn carter has entered hospice care at her home in plains, georgia. she's spending her remaining time with her husband and their family. the 96-year-old was diagnosed with dementia in may. this announcement coming nine months after the former president jimmy carter also entered hospice care. the school canceled a pro-palestinian event, featuring congresswoman tlaib. tlaib, the only palestinian american in congress, has been a fierce district of u.s. foreign policy toward israel. university officials, however, claim the event was cancelled because it was not properly registered. earlier in the day, a bipartisan group of state lawmakers condemned the visit. that happened, of course, after the house voted to censure tlaib here in washington. i'm kevin in washington, now back to more hannity. >> sean: so joe bide president's weak foreign policy was on full display this week as he met with