we start with the fox news alert, travel advisory for new york city. conservative or republican or trump supporter beware and the weather nizam biden criminal justice system, political differences are now considered especially heinous. and if new york's powerful democrats your politics a prison cell might be in your future or some kind of conviction. something that they make up. without a second thought, these democrats so make up a crime conductor show trial and rigour conviction with a hand-picked bite and donating judge, regardless of the evidence if they can explain it. and hours ago the former president of the united states now running for a second term, donald trump convicted in all 34 sent only counts and will be sentenced a few days before the republican convention. how convenient. most americans including people in that very courtroom cannot even identify the felonies. that is because this is a conviction without a crime against joe biden's chief political rival in the middle of a presidential campaign. the only so-called evidence was uncorroborated testimony, let's say from a serial liar who emits he has an alter your it of motive that's likely caught lying on the stand during his testimony and we will see over time and is also admitted thief on top of everything. of course the left will celebrate, they will sing and dance and they will high-five, call trumpet convicted felon. they are cheering the end of what would be equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws, let me bear no doubt. this is a sad day for the country. it's a sad day for the justice system, best justice system ever created by man, the foundation of our constitutional republic, it's dying before your eyes, welfare rules the day former president running first second term with near limited resources can be treated like this, no one is safe. they should send a chill down the spine of every business leader, politician, not just in new york but because we have a weapon eyes department of justice under joe biden. you step out of line a corrupt democrat of some kind, somewhere will throw you in jail, if you beat the living hell out of a police officer or old people in new york city and it's on video, don't worry no bail needed on the slap on the wrist. is that justice to you? in this case they employed the novel knew never applied before legal theory, never try in us history, a far-fetched misdemeanour, passed statute of limitations then magically converted that into a felony with a federal law based on some nebulous unspecified federal election violation that was never charged or prosecuted of which he has zero jurisdiction. he then multiply that same charge 34 times and that's a shady manoeuvre recalled account to stacking. the case that missed dearly made its way to a large -- far left partisan judge. who, by the wait needed to joe biden. the daughter in democratic local operative that reports say may profit from this very trial. to be cause for recusal. but knowing a new york the fake justice system saw this as a conflict of interest? remember he was purposely pics for every single trump related case. rather than having a pool that they chose from as per usual, this was a dream come true for him. never even tried to hide his bias according to witnesses in the courtroom. he simply coddled the prosecution, rampant speculation, irrelevant in material smears and he encourage the prosecution to mislead the jury and insinuate that michael cohen's election crimes were tied to this case. he should be viewed as an accessory to the trump crimes before the conviction, that happened earlier today. there he different story with the defence, he actually blocks testimony and election law expert, former head of the ftc, paraded trump's team and the key witness in front of the jury, he rejected every objection made by the defence and attempted to silence donald trump with what was it clearly unconstitutional cake order and perhaps worst of all his jury instructions were completely unconstitutional telling jurors that they did not need to agree on what the phantom law was our the phantom underlying election felony is as long as they agreed that he did something wrong that was enough for a conviction. according to him, i did not need to be unanimous in the sense of what they believe. naturally the jurors did not even specify in the ruling. in other words donald trump [ inaudible ] that is because it is insane. first we know from the 2020 supreme court ruling in louisiana, there can be no question that the sixth amendment's and unanimity requirement applies to state in criminal trials equally, that's not all. cures the us supreme court ruling from andre versus the us quote, and a jury verdict is required where the sixth and seventh amendment supply in criminal cases this requirement extends to all issues. and by the way character or degree of the crime, guilt, punishment that are left to the jury, let me repeat a criminal case the requirement of unanimity extends to all issues, that is not what the judge instructed this jury. he also was a right to know what he's being charged with, he did not know the whole time. according to them the sixth amendment of our constitution grants all americans the right to know who your accusers are in the nature of the charges in the evidence against you. apparently this rule of law that does not apply to him either. he ignored all civil liberties during the instruction to jurors and of course he likely was not a problem for the jury, they barely deliberated despite the complexity of the legal theory at play. and they probably all hate donald trump. so it was an easy sell, new york city voted against trump 9-1. god forbid he got the change of venue that would've been the right thing to do. not one applicable persecution is in the works, that's not in the cards. many democrats equal justice under the law is now completely tonight meaningless. they just take conservatives and they hate republicans and they hate anybody with a last name trump above all else. they are desperate for one party rule in perpetuity, they are hell-bent on using our justice system as a political weapon. we talked about the weaponization of the justice system, a dual justice system. it's all for them and a means to an end. new york city far left democrats here's the best part of tonight. they don't have the final say. president trump moments after the verdict, listen closely. >> it was a disgrace a rig to trial by conflicted judge who was corrupt a rigged trial in a disgrace that would not give us a venue change, we were at 5 percent or 6 percent of this district in this area and this was a rigged disgraceful trial in the real verdict is going to be november 5th by the people and they know what happened here and everybody knows what happened here and you have respect, da and the whole thing, we did not do a thing wrong and i'm a very innocent man and it's okay, i'm fighting for our country and our constitution, the whole country is being rigged right now, it was done by the biden administration in order to wound or hurt an opponent, a political opponent and i think it's just a disgrace and will keep fighting and fight till the end and we will win because our country is gone to hell and we don't have the same country anymore we have a divided mess, the nation in decline, millions of people pouring into our country right now from prisons and mental institutions, terrorists and their taking over our country, we have a country that's in big trouble. it was a rigged decision right from day one with a conflicted judge who should never have been allowed to try this case. and we will fight for our constitution, this is long from over, think you. >> sean: the case is far from over and you will get to render the final verdict in this case and 150 days, the case we'll be appealed and donald trump we'll be vindicated, i see no scenario in which is not overturned, that's almost a certainty. but will it happen before the election or after? all afternoon all evening people up and asking me, what can we do, as president trump said, the real verdict will take place on november 5th and by the way, voting early, voting by mail, overcome your reluctance and resistance the system we're stuck with, we need legal ballot harvesting to max the efforts of democrats and surpassed them partisan observers to watch the voting all day and the vote counting all night. but if you want this law fair to continue election joe biden, if you want the border crisis to continue, people coming from china, russia iran, syria, yemen, egypt, afghanistan, kazakhstan go for joe. they are unvented. if you like defund, dismantled nobel laws, if you want more biden inflation, reelect the guy that caused it, joe biden. if you're happy with the wars in the carnage overseas joe biden is your guide. if you want all this you get to decide. not 12 jurors in new york city, ultimately it is your choice. americans who are rightly outraged by this verdict they need to take away one major thing. 158 days you get to decide and voting early, you get to decide if the ballot box. you get to deliver the final verdict. so whatever you're feeling today, may i humbly suggest that you channel that into action on november the 5th, otherwise this is the america and you will hand off to your children and you're grandchildren and it will be assisted steep uphill battle to reverse course. joining us with reaction, fox news contributor, host of sunday night in america fox news is with us, good to see you both. you've been with us from the beginning i was pretty realistic , we both communicated often on air and off air. i think it's a culmination of the weaponization of our system of justice and now for a long time for people, i think it's an extraordinarily dangerous time for america if you look at everything that we talked about and the judge in the conflict that he had. and the judge being a biden donor. and what the judge allowed in closing arguments and jury instructions, the way he treated the defence in this case, when you put it together, it really is not surprising, is it? >> no, it's not surprising. the instructions called into a column where you shoot game in a cage because in defence of some of those jurors, they may not have seen any alternative but conviction. keep in mind the judge allowed the government to repeatedly tell them that it was a fact than election violation occurred in that trump had ordered it. the judge stayed absolutely silent during that statement over and over again even though it violated his instruction and stay we won't know what the jury really decided on the conspiracy, i was in that court room listening to 34 guilty verdicts. but they did not say what the jury thought had happened, they are unanimous only in that some crime, some secondary crime occurred, the judge did not require them to reach unanimity on what that crime was. so it's going to go on appeal in the appellate court won't know more than we have in terms of knowledge. as to what is an election violation, and other falsification of documents? at tax violation? that is just simply not in the record. >> sean: let me bring you in here, this was the point that jonathan made and i've made over and over again, jury had been told dozens and dozens of times that the payments were campaigned by violations especially enclosing that six are closing, the judge left all of that go uncontradicted in this case. then you have the issue of the 4-4-4 where he's guilty you could have one group thinking he's guilty for four think he's guilty, four for whatever. that's a direct violation of the us supreme court decision, 2020 decision. but again this was a loud. i believe it's overturned on appeal to when is the appeal can happen? did you see anything like this. your prosecutor, i don't think you ever lost a case. >> the jury was unanimous in the lack of unanimity. you are right, i tried cases where i had to prove an additional crime, every death penalty case you have to prove murder, plus something else beyond a reasonable doubt. and the jury has to specify what that additional crime is. as we sit here tonight, we can't tell you whether was one of those three, whether it was some other crime that's nebulous that we don't know about. i came last week to this courtroom and i heard rumours of the judge was pro- prosecution, i was a prosecutor as you pointed out, i spent four days in the courtroom, not just pro- prosecution, i cannot, i would struggle to think of a significant objection by the defence that was actually sustained in the tone in which he treated counsel was disparate. he let the prosecutor, andy and jonathan i were talking about the defence, i think they failed to object during the prosecution closing argument because they had battered lawyers syndrome, they had just been beaten up for weeks and weeks. so will it be overturned on appeal? i can think of five different ways that it can be but i do not think that it will happen before the election which to your other point that best revenge is success. if you want to just assistant that does not elect a district attorney who promises to go after a political opponent that you need to win at the ballot box. alvin, late naming of the crime that he's got really exercised about? it's not shoplifting, it's not stealing, it's not getting people on the street, it's alleged hush-money to keep someone quiet about a sexual encounter. that is what gets his attention. >> sean: 8-year-old case, 130,000-dollar payment, it does boggle the mind and a misdemeanour and a statute of limitations had run out but somehow when did a local new york city courtroom become a place to try federal election crime because that seems rather novel to me as well. or federal tax crime. >> that is what was so maddening about the comments tonight, when he kept on saying its just standard stuff. at some point you have to admit that this has never been attempted before, even other networks and said that. other networks and said that this would not have been brought against anyone except for trump, and that something that if you're an honest person you have to accept. this was a political use of the criminal justice system to create this novel effort and i think in the end what you have to tell people that are upset about this is that manhattan is not the entirety of this nation. we are bigger than this case being that this district, we have a system that's proven itself over and over again in history but we all had to take a leap of faith to take a breath. >> sean: let me ask you -- we have a weapon's department of justice under joe biden the thirst -- third-highest rating official left a prestigious present position to work on this case. youth agree with me that that the doj's weapon eyes, i think it's clear it is. >> this case, i think has really fulfilled the argument of many that you've weapon system. the fact that he came from the third position in doj really were reaffirmed that. but being in that room since history. the question is what history, the convicted of precedent but they may have also gotten this country to focus in a way that is never happened before the misuse of the legal system. and so his streaming galvanized american inks do not like donald trump. but they don't like what was done in this case to get donald trump. i had a feeling sense of history both ways. >> we'll give you lost form, what you think the outcome of this is the professor will join us later. thinks that this is really a precedent-setting moment and that this law fair is going to continue because they were successful using. >> at some point has to stop. and look, do i blame allegedly progressive prosecutors and defence attorneys masquerading as prosecutors? i do. but i really blame voters who will elect people to go after certain targeted individuals, prosecutors go after crime, they do not go after people and there is a reason the lady wears a blindfold. there's a auric. she's not supposed to care whether you are republican, democrat, black, white, male or female, if you don't get back to those days you ask the professor about weaponization of doj, just look at what was done to chats and then look at what was not done to the us attorney in the district of massachusetts, they had her on a full statement and nothing happened to her. treat people the same, be fair, if we lose that that we lost our justice system. >> sean: hillary clinton no reason for prosecutor to prosecute, 3000 e-mails, take money give it to a law firm and funnel to enough research in higher a guy in a dirty russian dossier. use it to require, no problem. and joe biden has problems with classified top-secret document, he did not get rated. this is what americans are seeing tonight and it's a scary moment i think for the country. but thank you both, we appreciate you staying up late tonight and i know you been working late, here to react to the verdict, former president trump legal spokeswoman, not former, she's president trump's legal spokesperson and she's been the courtroom the whole time. everybody i know around president trump says that he is completely stoic and some of this comment, i guess it was clear in his comments about mother teresa. however, i'm sure it doesn't take the sting away and based on the actions that this judge, one has to wonder, four days before the rnc, is he going to release president trump on his own recognizance pending appeal is he going to declare he has have home confinement and can go to a debate over to his own convention pending appeal. or will he want to send them to jail? nothing that judge decides will shock me. >> it will shock me. let's remember who the judges. let's be very clear and i'm so happy to be on the show on such an important day in american history because if we do not stop this we are done, and i don't need it now, i mean right now as it yesterday. the judge today watched my client, i watched him and the jury say guilty 34 times and i watched him. and he looked at my client any covered health. he covered his mouth probably because he was smiling. let's be very clear, this judge has has no shock to me trump. and he is 100 percent a man that should have recused himself that our justice system is so broken right now. and i also want to remind the american people one thing, i'm a legal spokesperson, and also an american and i'll be voting for trump not because of president trump who i obviously support. because i support america. and so does he care our country is currently in a series of state and we cannot look at this as anything other than a serious state of affairs, will become an issue, were people are using takes in illegal courtroom, it cannot happen anymore, i've seen it and i have been in courts over, trial after trial after trial for 15 years i have been practising law and i've never seen anything like this in my life. and that judge intentionally would not even allow pretrial proceedings of the court will not report, they would not allow us to bring up president trump did not even take deductions, he didn't do anything wrong,'s cfo, the trump organization family, nothing. that evidence was kept away from the jury and intentional. it's not america. and i'm speaking to msnbc viewers and cnn viewers, it is time to come together because this ministration does not care about us. they do not. they care about themselves. >> sean: they don't care either because they got what they wanted. and for them it doesn't matter, it bm will say this. and i've said there's a number of days ago fox and friends on the show. this is not can impact the election is my prediction 150 days, i don't believe it is. it's amazing, michael cohen himself testified that he told many people that he did this on his own. at that point stop right there. that should have whatever novel legal theory that they're putting out. an