Live Breaking News & Updates on Unanimity

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Unanimity on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Unanimity and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Verified Live

famous replay against manchester united in 2005. a third—round occasion as well in the spirit of the cup. and they released a statement as well, pretty much unanimity amongst the efl cobs as tranmere rovers coming out with a very strong statement. in tranmere rovers coming out with a very strong statement.— very strong statement. in many of the statements, _ very strong statement. in many of the statements, and _ very strong statement. in many of the statements, and i've - very strong statement. in many of the statements, and i've read - very strong statement. in many of. the statements, and i've read many the statements, and i�*ve read many of them, they reference that they thought there had been a complete lack of consultation and many of them centred on the conclusion that this was all about protecting the premier league and the big boys, not even of the premier league, just the top clutch to play in europe. football associations rather clever mantra is for all but this is really for the few. this is about champions league clubs and it has been complicated from an english perspective about the expansion of the champions league next season by

Cup , Replay , Spirit , Occasion , Manchester-united , 2005 , Many , Statement , Statements , Cobs , Unanimity , Tranmere-rovers

BBC News

occasion. something that the football association should be protecting. they released a statement as well, so there's pretty much _ statement as well, so there's pretty much unanimity amongst the clubs. rovers— much unanimity amongst the clubs. rovers also— much unanimity amongst the clubs. rovers also came out with a statement. | rovers also came out with a statement-— rovers also came out with a statement. . . , , ., , statement. i read many statements over the last — statement. i read many statements over the last 24 _ statement. i read many statements over the last 24 hours, _ statement. i read many statements over the last 24 hours, and - statement. i read many statements over the last 24 hours, and most ofj over the last 24 hours, and most of the referenced, they thought it was a lack of consultation, centred on the conclusion that this was all about protecting the premier league and the big boys — not even all of the premier league, just the top clutch in europe. the the premier league, 'ust the top clutch in europe._ the premier league, 'ust the top clutch in europe. the clever mantra is football for _ clutch in europe. the clever mantra is football for all, _ clutch in europe. the clever mantra is football for all, but _ clutch in europe. the clever mantra is football for all, but this - clutch in europe. the clever mantra is football for all, but this is - is football for all, but this is realty— is football for all, but this is really about the few. this is about the champions league clubs. by the expansion— the champions league clubs. by the expansion of the champions league, effectively, the group stage impinges later in the season, and that crosses paths with the fa cup. ithink— that crosses paths with the fa cup. i think everyone understands that there _ i think everyone understands that there is— i think everyone understands that

Statement , Statements , Clubs , Football-association , Rovers , Unanimity , Something , Well , Premier-league , Most , Conclusion , Referenced

The Lead With Jake Tapper

he just, you know what this is, the reality of it. and i just wonder if by opposing everything, your group of people who are, who are upset with what the speakers it's doing. if you haven't taken yourself out of relevance in terms of what's in the bill. if you were committed to, i will vote for the role as long as you put in immigration restrictions, then you might have more of an influence on what he's bringing to the floor for a vote on saturday? >> yeah. jake, so i told the speaker last night the number one that we had fold unanimity among the freedom caucus in particular, and that we could advance israel to the floor and support the role and have a vote on that. and then i said that i believe that we could get agreement on the rules certainly would have my support on moving a rule forward if you had ukraine with border security attached and border security, i offered numerous options that's right. not just hr to take it or leave it, but some variations of of hr two. maybe you could take out a verified and be able to move it

People , You-haven-t , Group , Reality , Everything , Speakers , Doing , Bill , Terms , Role , Immigration-restrictions , Relevance

Laura Coates Live

nixon said that i don't have to turn over the tapes to the watergate special prosecutor, the supreme court in august of 1974 unanimously rejected that view. the fact that the supreme court, which was not as politically polarized in those days, but still had a lot of different views on it, the fact that they rolled unanimously against the president made the case irrefutable. it made richard nixon comply, and he did turn over the tapes, and the tapes ultimately sunk his presidency. roberts will certainly try to get unanimity in a case like this, whether he does or not is another different story. >> coates: if wishes were horses, beggars would ride, that's a whole's old-school way of saying -- >> when you look at this court, and it is much more politically

Fact , United-states-supreme-court , Tapes , Supreme-court-in-august , Special-prosecutor , View , Watergate , 1974 , August-of-1974 , President , January-6th-case , Lot

Laura Coates Live

>> coates: ultimately this could go up to the supreme court, they said they will not weigh in on this matter specifically ad, it's why it's in front of the circuit court. it was already proceeding in that fashion. they could get this case after this ruling comes down, whatever it might be, probably sooner than later. the question is, if it goes before the supreme court, and your chief justice roberts, you've seen the numbers in regards to our approval rating, your popularity, the rates that have been stepped on for ethical discussions and beyond, you probably want unanimity here. you want this to be a decisive, not a 63, or something different than that. is there a hope, that if it goes to the supreme court on the issue of absolute immunity for a president, that unanimity might be on the horizon. >> this argument by presidential rob is so bad, it might be a possibility. remember in 1974 when richard

January-6th-case , Coates , United-states-supreme-court , Matter , Circuit-court , Ruling , Front , Ad , Fashion , Question , Roberts , Rates

Laura Coates Live

the fact that the supreme court, which was not as polarized in those days but had different views on it. the fact they ruled unanimously against the president, made the case irrefutable. it made richard nixon comply and he did turn over the tapes and the tapes sunk his presidency. rogds roberts will want to get unanimity in a case like this. >> if wishes were horses, beggars would ride. that's the old-school way of saying who knows? >> you look at the court and it's much more politically polarized than in many years, probably since the 1930s. they are not unanimous on many controversial cases. >> you mentioned tapes, i'm thinking brad raffensperger and

President , Supreme-court , Fact , Views , January-6th-case , Richard-nixon , Tapes , Presidency , Way , Court , Saying , Unanimity

Laura Coates Live

they could get this case after the ruling that comes down. probably sooner than later. if it goes before the supreme court. if you're chief justice john robert, you see issues of credibility, the rakes that have stepped on for ethical discussions and beyond. you probably want unanimity here. you want this to be a decisive, not a 6-3, or something different than that. is there a hope that this, if it goes the supreme court on absolute immunity for a president, that unanimity might be on the horizon? >> this argument by president trump is so bad that that's a possibility. remember, in 1974, when richard said, i don't have to turn over the tapes to the watergate special prosecutor. the supreme court, in august of 1974, rejected that view.

January-6th-case , Supreme-court , Issues , John-robert , Ruling , Something , Unanimity , Discussions , Beyond , Decisive , Credibility , 3

BBC News Now

payment to victim compensation is. the issue is that if their convictions are not overturned, they cannot go through the compensation process so what the government is looking at is whether they can overturn all of those convictions are once and in whatever way they can and as we've been saying, one of the options is they could look at passing an act declaring that convictions be crossed. a number of former ministers have suggested that would be the way forward but there is no unanimity among different people because for example, the former attorney general says if they did that, it would amount to parliamentary interference in the judicial process and he said that each case ought to be considered on its own merits and be sent to the criminal cases review commission which in this country investigates alleged miscarriages ofjustice and said that the idea of a new law would be a short cut that might leave people dissatisfied that they

Way , Government , Issue , All , Convictions , Victim-compensation , Compensation-process , Payment , One , Ministers , Number , Saying

Inside Politics With Manu Raju

unanimity. >> and that is john roberts trial to avoid these issues. and this immunity case, this is very important case. d.c. circuit will hear arguments this week. if trump wins in this case, what does that marean for the 91 cous and four different criminal cases just to remind ow viewers if he wins in this d.c. circuit case, what does it mean for the rest of the criminal charges. >> i think this one he has a less likelihood of winning on this. i think he's brought up immunity as a claim, claimed absolute immunity which isn't even really grounded in law that he is immune from prosecution in these cases. and i think he's more unlikely to succeed on that particular case as opposed to the disqualification case. but obviously the consequences, the consequences are just nout about donald trump, but any future president and whether or not they could be held

Issues , Circuit-case , Trial , Arguments , Immunity-case , Marean , Circuit , Wins , Cous , Unanimity , John-roberts , D-c-

CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield

repercussions not just for colorado, but across the country. you could see movements in swing states. i would expect, if that is true, you're going to see republican states try to do the same thing to joe biden. i think the more interesting thing to me is that this is just the first supreme court case that you're going to see in this election. there are already several other cases, mostly on the donald trump side of things, about presidential immunity, about whether or not some of the acts that were conducted on january 6th rise to the level of felony, other various appeals that are going through the system. the supreme court is going to be more involved in this presidential election than perhaps any in american history, and this is just the first case that they could be hearing. >> all right, we'll leave it there for now. >> that's a pretty uncomfortable place for chief justice john roberts to be because he's not somebody who likes to wade into politics. i would expect him to try to get something as close to unanimity,

Joe-biden , Country , States , Thing , Colorado , Swing-states , Republican , Movements , Repercussions , Trump , Supreme-court , Case