president biden earlier said that israel was losing international support because of what he called its indiscriminate bombing of gaza. our north america correspondent shingai nyoka explains why the us voted against the resolution. it's no surprise they did that, in fact the text of this particular resolution was similar to the one that was debated on friday, with the security council where the us blocked it, vetoed it, and there really was no expectation that the us was going to vote against it. 153 countries or member states of the un, voted in favour of this immediate call for a cease—fire, or call for an immediate cease—fire and those countries included india and canada. 23 countries abstained, and i think it's interesting to note that the uk is increasingly abstaining in these votes. the uk un ambassador barbara woodward said the support for israel that the uk supports israel's right to defend itself against hamas but said it must be targeted at, must be targeted to achieve that goal. and so what this shows i think, more importantly, is the fact that even though this is nonbinding, there is an increasing number of countries globally who are opposed to israel's offensive in gaza. a similar vote that was held in october, the first attempt to passing a resolution, there were 121 countries that voted in favour of that. and so there is a sense that israel is increasingly isolated in its offensive. earlier, i spoke to aaron david miller, former us state department adviser and a senior fellow at the carnegie endowment for international peace, and asked for his views about the vote. last week, the united states vetoed a un security council resolution, and this general assembly resolution was deficient in the sense that there was no reference to hamas�*s retention of hostages and no condemnation of hamas. the americans don't usually express their views through the un general assembly or the un security council, and clearly it reflects the fact that the united states is increasingly isolated in the international community and also also in the region. i want to ask you about president biden�*s comment. posted it on x, formally twitter that biden�*s comments today are a blinking yellow light to netanyahu about growing divergence between the us and israel on gaza war? could it turn red? what is your view? do you think it could turn red? you know, october 10th, the administration president gave one of the most emotional speeches of his presidency and made it unmistakably clear that he was going to stand with the israelis and give them the space, time and support that they needed to do what they thought they needed to do in the wake of the savagery of october seven and the hamas terror surge. i think there's been a shift in tone in response to the exponential rise of palestinian deaths and the humanitarian catastrophe that now affects both northern and southern gaza. so i think there is a divergence of opinion. there's no doubt there are two separate clocks. the administration clock under more pressure, even at home from members of his own party, is ticking much faster than the israeli operations. administration i think, wants the israelis to wrap up this phase of their kinetic campaign in the south in weeks. and the israelis, i think, need more time to hear them express it, are talking about months. so i think there's a growing divergence on that issue. there's also a growing divergence on the day after. the netanyahu government, the most extreme in israel's history, opposes anything remotely resembling a two state solution. and there are also opposed to returning the palestinian authority, weak as it may be back to gaza to govern. so i think there is growing friction between the us and israel, whether or not the blinking yellow light and that's what i think it is. it's a cautionary light, whether it's going to turn red, suggesting that president biden is going to call up netanyahu and say stop or enough. i doubt, i doubt that's the case. the father of a young woman killed by hamas during the october seven attack says he continues to believe in a two state solution for israelis and palestinians. outlet international correspondent reports from tel aviv. they were young and in love. this is danielle waldman and her boyfriend, noam shai. their whole lives were ahead of them. she was an amazing girl. she loved to dance. she loved animals. she loved people. she had many, many friends. she never did anything wrong to anyone. shejust loved doing good things. and then theyjust murdered herfor no reason. they were so happy together. danielle's father, ael waldman, told me the couple were planning to marry. yeah, we decided with his parents that best is that we bury them together instead of getting them married. and we did in the north. the two were among those who fled in terror when hamas attacked a music festival on october the seventh. we have a video like few minutes before they were murdered, when they were still in the car. and then we had a phone call when they were screaming that everybody were hurt. so my question is... this is the last footage of danielle and herfriends trying to stay calm. someone says, "it'll be ok." then a hint of panic. despite the killing of his daughter, eyalwaldman still believes in a palestinian state. he is a tech giant who has created jobs in gaza and the west bank in the past. do you regret that now? no, i don't regret. i think i need to do and we need to do everything we can to make this place the best place to live in. and we need to stop killing each other and finding a way to live together. i built a design centre in gaza. i donated $360,000 to a hospital in gaza. i started a peace initiative with gaza. and he says he still has hopes for peace. and then i hope that like in two to four years we'll be able to do peace and build two states for the two people and be able to live together next to each other. but before that, anyone that was responsible, anyone that was associated with what happened in october seven, �*23 will be eliminated and we will take care of that. danielle was killed just weeks before her 25th birthday. her father says she touched everyone she met with her smile. orla guerin, bbc news, tel aviv. president biden has told his visiting ukrainian counterpart his administration will continue to support kyiv in its fight against russia, even in the face of domestic political opposition in the us. volodymyr zelensky is in washington dc to try and save a $61 billion us defence package for kyiv. but his pleas for a quick approval of the aid package have gained little traction with republicans in congress. president biden says congress would be giving a christmas gift to russia if it fails to pass the measure. history willjudge harshly those who have turned their backs on freedom's cause. today, ukraine's freedom is on the line, but if we don't stop putin, it will endanger the freedom of everyone almost anywhere. putin will keep going and would—be aggressors everywhere will be emboldened to try and take what they can by force. colonel brendan kearney is a military expert and former us marines chief of staff in europe. he says he doesn't believe the standoff is a gift to russia. i don't think putin really cares who will use it internally in russia, to try to highlight the divisiveness between ukraine and the united states, and implicitly western europe. but he's got bigger fish to fry in terms of trying to keep the military operation ongoing in ukraine. now $60 billion is a lot of money. in your view, will president zelenskyy be able to get it? i guess another question is, will it be enough? you know, it's hard to say. i'll answer the last part of your question first. it's hard to say how much effort is going to be enough, because that will depend on how long this conflict continues on. i think zelenskyy is going to get the money. i don't think he's obviously not getting it today. he's not going home with a check in his pocket. i think it's going to end up giving out to him incrementally and i think the thing is, this is not $60 billion simply handed over. this is weapons, this is communications gear, this is fuel. it covers a wide variety of things, a lot of things will be sourced in the united states and charged bureaucratically against the ukrainian war. so the actual money that gets into the hands of zelenskyy is questionable. i don't think anybody even knows that right now. and there is an ongoing debate, isn't there, about how the united states has contributed a lot more than others in the world. you know, again, the accountants are having a great deal of fun with this type of thing, trying to total it all up. the united states have given, its north of $100 billion so far, i think it's 113 billion. europe, countries from around the world, have all given an awful lot. exactly how much, i'm not sure everybody knows. i think united states can safely say they are the leading donor, but i don't think they outdo everybody else that's out there. do you think the fact that president zelenskyy was in dc himself, do you think that makes a difference, even if he doesn't get the money today? i think it makes a huge difference. nobody... we have to hand it to zelenskyy, he is ukraine's greatest and most articulate advocate. he has pulled off the miracle that when we think back of the first days of the war, nobody thought was going to be able to be pulled off. and it's all by his example, and his personal involvement with the leaders of the western world, that really, really has played a critical role in ukraine being able to defeat, so far, one of the most powerful countries in the world. so i give zelenskyy a lot of credit. he's articulate, he's smart, and he's the guy that needed to come to washington, dc to signal to the world that he is very, very serious about continuing this fight, and that he needs american help. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. breaking the law. these scooters were filmed on the streets of lincoln in the last few days. the only place they can legally be written is on private land with the permission of the landowner. but they have become a common sight in our towns and cities. theyjust sight in our towns and cities. they just good sight in our towns and cities. theyjust good pasty and you don't even know they coming around. in don't even know they coming around. , ., around. in the run-up to christmas _ around. in the run-up to christmas you _ around. in the run-up to christmas you will- around. in the run-up to christmas you will find i around. in the run-up to christmas you will find a | around. in the run-up to - christmas you will find a wide range of scooters on sale on big—name shops alongside one from lincolnshire police. their message is think twice before you buy one as at present. you would play — you buy one as at present. you would play seeking _ you buy one as at present. 7m, would play seeking legal use them as on private land with them as on private land with the landowner position. for most people, not going to have that option. most people, not going to have that option-— that option. saving fuel and allowin: that option. saving fuel and allowing people _ that option. saving fuel and allowing people to - that option. saving fuel and allowing people to travel, l allowing people to travel, think_ allowing people to travel, think it _ allowing people to travel, think it is a good idea. i think it is a good idea. think it is a good idea. think it is a good idea. i think it could be quite useful as an — think it could be quite useful as an alternative _ think it could be quite useful as an alternative to - think it could be quite useful as an alternative to bikes. i as an alternative to bikes. until_ as an alternative to bikes. until they— as an alternative to bikes. until they are _ as an alternative to bikes. until they are regulated . as an alternative to bikes. l until they are regulated and actually— until they are regulated and actually looked _ until they are regulated and actually looked at, - until they are regulated and actually looked at, then - until they are regulated and actually looked at, then i. actually looked at, then i think_ actually looked at, then i think they— actually looked at, then i think they are _ actually looked at, then i think they are a - actually looked at, then i think they are a bit - actually looked at, then i think they are a bit of. actually looked at, then i think they are a bit of a l think they are a bit of a problem _ think they are a bit of a problem-— think they are a bit of a roblem. ., ., , ., , ., problem. for more stories from across the _ problem. for more stories from across the uk, _ problem. for more stories from across the uk, head _ problem. for more stories from across the uk, head to - problem. for more stories from across the uk, head to the - problem. for more stories from across the uk, head to the bbc| across the uk, head to the bbc news website. you're live with bbc news. what was supposed to be the final day of the cop28 climate conference has been and gone, and still no deal on tackling global warming. we understand last—minute talks are still happening after an earlier draft of a deal was strongly criticised because it stopped short of calling for fossil fuels to be phased out. our climate reporter has been following the talks in dubai and sent this update with the overnight negotiations under way. we are in the final day of cop28 global climate summit co p28 global climate summit negotiations cop28 global climate summit negotiations and we are past the deadline that the president set for countries, which was 11am this morning. there has been more than ten hours of negotiations here today on the new draft tax that dropped last night and country still cannot agree. the main issues they are facing is firstly on fossil fuels. there is the removal of the language on phasing out fossil fuels. the language on phasing out fossilfuels. in its place was given a list of options that countries could not should adopt for reducing emissions which many groups including the eu and the uk were not happy with. another key area they are still discussing is money for developing countries. some countries here, including nigeria, saudi arabia, say they are not happy to adopt any language on phasing out fossil fuels unless they are given firm commitments that they will be supported by richer nations in that progress from fossil fuels to renewable energy. we know previously that 100 million was pledged to poorer countries and that was not delivered on in time, so there are certainly some scepticism from those developing countries that any money will be delivered. we are hearing that consultations will carry on until the early hours of the morning and then we are expecting a new draft tax and a coming together of countries for the final discussion before negotiations closer here tomorrow potentially. aha, negotiations closer here tomorrow potentially. a lead researcher— tomorrow potentially. a lead researcher in _ tomorrow potentially. a lead researcher in energy - tomorrow potentially. a lead researcher in energy and - researcher in energy and climate at the ise sas institute and joins me now. thank you so much forjoining me on newsday. firstly, are you at all surprised that they have not come to an agreement and they are still talking? i not come to an agreement and they are still talking?— they are still talking? i am not surprised, _ they are still talking? i am not surprised, mariko, - they are still talking? i am not surprised, mariko, but definitely once again we are disappointed. the main issue of course is the wording on fossil fuels. you mentioned action on fossilfuel is an fuels. you mentioned action on fossil fuel is an option rather than a requirement, and a reduction rather than a phase—out. so this of course will have huge repercussions in terms of mitigation moving forward. as we all know, the main driver of climate change is the use of fossil fuels, and if countries don't come together and strongly oppose the of fossil fuels and the deployment of renewables at a much faster level, then i think we're in trouble. we much faster level, then i think we're in trouble.— much faster level, then i think we're in trouble. we have been s-ueakin we're in trouble. we have been speaking to _ we're in trouble. we have been speaking to critics _ we're in trouble. we have been speaking to critics and - speaking to critics and protesters in fact he said the summit had an outsize influence of fossil fuel lobbyists with some saying not enough action has taken place despite the talks. how do you think this kind of stalemate affects the public�*s views on the topic of climate change? public's views on the topic of climate change?— public's views on the topic of climate change? well, away at the climate — climate change? well, away at the climate change _ climate change? well, away at the climate change in - climate change? well, away at. the climate change in southeast asia programme, we do climate perception survey, yes, every year, and there are many questions that we asked the respondents, one of which looks at effectiveness of policy, what they think of national policy climate change and there is a certain level of scepticism in terms of policy being taken, the impact of it. but overall there is a consensus on the threat of climate change and people feel very strongly that climate change is an immediate threat or a very important threat in their lives. but there generally is some level of scepticism regarding the amount of cooperation, national policy—making, regional policy making, that is being undertaken to address this issue. �* , , ., issue. and i guess the other issue. and i guess the other issue is that _ issue. and i guess the other issue is that climate - issue is that climate commitments can be quite expensive, and whether or not consumers are willing to pay more to go green. what is your finding on that?— finding on that? interestingly this ear finding on that? interestingly this year we _ finding on that? interestingly this year we have _ finding on that? interestingly this year we have found - finding on that? interestingly this year we have found a - this year we have found a majority of people that undertook our survey actually support a carbon tax. however, at the global level, there has been consistent shortfalls in developing countries meeting their finance obligations, as you mentioned, and southeast asia actually needs around more than 200 billion euros annually up than 200 billion euros annually up to 2034 investment in climate infrastructure, and that accounts to around 45% of southeast asia gdp. so it is a huge burden on southeast asian countries and developing economies in other parts of the world. so the loss and fund appointment is a positive outcome but the issue is will the finance obligations be met by the developing countries? we will see if they can come to an agreement as the talks continue. thanks so much for joining us on newsday. the british prime minister rishi sunak�*s emergency bill, reviving his plan to send asylum seekers to rwanda, has been approved by parliament, enabling it to proceed to the next stage of the legislative process. the bill, which opened up deep divisions in britain's ruling conservative party, was passed with a majority of 44, in a knife—edge parliamentary vote. our political editor chris mason has more. excuse me, excuse me. the man in the middle. the man of the moment. can you make out the prime minister at the bottom of your screen making his way through the crowd? almost half seven tonight, and result time. the ayes to the right, 313. the noes to the left, 269. the government had won. minister, how big a sigh of relief are you sighing? well, i think the gover