hours of literally planes, trains, and automobiles, to get from malawi, back to my workplace tonight, including a flight delay along the way, three airplanes. >> well i'm glad you make it made it. >> so here's the thing. with this kind of jet lag, anything can happen. well >> that's a strong tease. >> chris, don't leave the building, because we might need you, and there could be, i could slip into a nap at the first commercial break. not to mention what could come out of my mouth, don't leave, i'm begging you, don't leave. >> i won't be leaving the building, and the viewers will be glued to their seats after this. >> anything can happen halloween. >> sounds wild. >> thank, you chris. >> well, arthur ray handsome the second of huntsville, alabama, has become the first trump fuller follower to be accused of following donald trump's in soliciting instructions to threaten the lives of people involved in the arrest and prosecution of donald trump. he delivered those threats in the stupidest possible trumpian way, by leaving voice mail messages for georgia's fulton county sheriff, and a separate voice mail message for fulton county district attorney fani willis. as soon as he hung up that fall when, he was on his way to eventually being arrested and charged with a federal crime of transmitting interstate threats. and when i read you the voice messages that he left in a moment, you can reasonably conclude that he is likely going to federal prison for those two phone calls. if arthur a hands on faces a judge in the sentencing hearing, the defendant or his lawyer will definitely tell the judge that he had no intention of carrying out his threats. and that won't be enough to save him from a prison sentence. but it will probably, and this is just a guess, it will probably be true. more than 99% of death threats are delivered by people who have no intention of carrying them out. i don't want to minimize death wretched anyway, because the threats themselves are serious crimes. but no one i know is more relaxed about death threats than i am. the only person i ever knew who was more relaxed about death threats than i am's my father, who gave me my first formative lesson in death threats when i was in first grade. my father was a boston police officer who worked his way through college in law school in night school and got his first big break as a lawyer in what was thin the crime of the century, the first time rank robbers stole over 1 million dollars. it was the famous brinks robbery in boston. but over the following decades it became the subject of several movies. my father represented some of the 11 defendants in that case. all of them were found guilty. and then years later, when the appeals process was finally exhausted, my father made a very unusual motion in court to have some of the evidence in the case returned to him, evidence that was taken from the trunk of the car of one of his clients during the arrest, that was never linked to the crime. it was $5,000 in nickels, dimes, and coworkers, in what appeared to be unmarked bank bags. now, certainly suspicious stuff, but never linked to that crime. the prosecution was very surprised by the motion. they weren't accustomed to having convicted bank robbers say give me the money back that you found in the trunk of my car. but eventually my father prevailed, and he walked out of the suffolk county courthouse one day to the glow of flashbulbs, carrying some of the bags with the $5,000 in nickels, dimes, and quarters, which he brought home that night, dropped in the living room for, where the kids got to dig in as if they were halloween bags of candy, and grab a fistful. and then, the phone rang. my father winter to his small cubbyhole of an office, off the living room, close that sliding door, and then we heard the yelling. and no one could yell like my father. he repeatedly said, you know where i live. come to my house right now. he said it in a way that sounded like a threat to the person he was speaking to. it had the ring of, come to my house right now and i'll knock your head off, that sort of thing. when he emerged from his little office, it was completely unperturbed. 's gearshift from anger to smile was the fastest i've ever seen. and of course we all wanted to know what happened, what that call was about. he said i, it was just a telephone commando. it wasn't good enough. so my mother asked more. and he said, the guy says i heard his money, and if i don't go to the corner of how untreated midnight tonight and give it tammy's gonna kill me. suddenly my brothers and i all living in a movie scene and we're all scared, but scared only for the number of seconds. my father left napped in the air before, saying if he was serious he never would've called, and then we all knew for an absolute fact, that it was a phony death threat. because my father just said so. and in those days, for us, that was good enough. and so when i got my first death threats for saying something that someone didn't like on tv in the 1990s, i didn't mention it to anyone. it's not an approach i recommend, but i'm offering this personal perspective tonight. in the hope that it might take your anxiety level down just a little bit, and only a bit, on the issue of donald trump inspired death threats because it's very likely that there will be more of them. and it will be always remaining statistically likely that they are not threats that include the intent to deliver the promises of those threats. i want to read you both of those threats that are now charged crimes against arthur ray hansen the second of huntsville, alabama, and keep in mind, as i read them, that he had over two months to act on his own threats, and he did not do a thing. nothing. shortly before donald trump was indicted in georgia, as the ray hands in the second, according to federal prosecutors, quote, called the fulton county government customer service line twice, and left to voice mails, the first four sheriff low bath, and the second four district tierney willis, and in his message for the sheriff he made statements that included, if you think you're gonna take a mugshot of my president, donald trump, and it's gonna be okay, you're gonna find out that after you take that mugshot, some bad expletives probably gonna happen to you. if you take a mugshot of the president and you're the reason it happened, some bed, expletives, gonna happen to you. i'm warning you right now before you, expletive, up your life, and get her real bad, whether you've got an expletive badge or not ain't gonna help yunnan, and you're gonna get, expletive drop, you keep expletive-ing with my president. hansen's message district attorney, he made statements that said, watch it when you're going to the car at night, when you're going into the, house watch everywhere you're going. i would be afraid if i were you, because you can't be around people all the time that are gonna protect you. there's gonna be moments when you're gonna be vulnerable. when you charge trump on that fourth indictment, anytime you're alone, be looking over your shoulder, and what you put out there, expletive, comes back at you ten times harder, and don't ever forget it. arthur ray hanson ii of huntsville, alabama, is 59 years old. he is, like every trump supporter, who has committed violence for donald trump, or threatened to commit violence for donald trump, profoundly and irreversibly stupid. he is a terrorist. those phone calls were intended to deliver, at minimum, terror into the lives of sheriff low bath and district attorney willis and their families, and the people they work with. if arthur ray hanson faces a judge his lawyer will definitely blame donald trump for those phone calls, in the same way the january six defendants lawyers have blame donald trump for their behavior. and on that point, the criminal defense lawyer will be telling the truth. judges in all the trump cases with the exception of the florida federal judge who was appointed by donald trump are considering how to stop donald trump from in effect picking up the telephone and putting it in the hands of the are farai hansen the seconds out there who are ready to spread trump terror in the world. the judge in the civil trod case fraud case has fined trump twice for violating that judges gag order, barring donald trump from verbally attacking court personnel. and in washington d.c., federal judge tanya chutkan, on sunday night, reinstated a gag order on donald trump that she had upended while trump was appealing the gag order. an hour. an hour after judge chutkan reinstated the gag order, on sunday night, donald trump posted, i called bill barr dom, weak, slow-moving, lethargic, got loose, and lazy, a rhino who could do the job. i was tough on him in the white house, for good reason, so now this moran says to me, to get even, his verbal skills are limited. bill barr is a loser. judge cut joe judge chutkan's bag gag order, buyers trump from attacking witnesses in the case, in which loan trump is accused leading up to jerry, six attorney barr is going to be a witness against him in that case. and then donald trump posted, through the night, last night, at 105 a.m., radical left judge taking away my right to free speech. judge chutkan's gag order does not buyer donald trump from attacking the judge. seven minutes later, at 1:12 a.m., judge trump posted, remember crooked joe biden and his radical left thugs waited three years to bring these indictments. judge chutkan's gag order does barr donald trump from attacking the prosecutors in this case who, in this post, donald trump was calling radical left thugs. at 4:24 a.m. donald trump repose to that same radical left thugs post. in addition to the two violations of the gag order in these posts, we see a chart of donald trump's insomnia, a condition he has admitted to for many, many years. the effects of insomnia are cumulative and get worse and worse overtime. donald trump got a maximum of three hours sleep last night. how that affected his performance today, we have no idea, since he did nothing public today. but for a presidential candidate who is constantly accusing democratic candidate joe biden, three years older than him, of being too old, it is worth noting that the effects of insomnia, according to the mayo clinic, are not what anyone should be hoping for in a precedent. irritability, depression or anxiety. difficulty paying attention, focusing on tasks or remembering. increased errors or accidents. that's the man who most republican voters tonight want to be president again. and who arthur ray hanson the second of huntsville, alabama, tried to help by delivering a threat. leading off our discussion tonight is andrew weissmann, former fbi general counsel and former chief of the criminal division of the eastern district of new york, he's the co-host of the msnbc podcast prosecuting donald trump, also neal katyal, former acting u.s. solicitor general most of the podcast courtside, both msnbc legal analyst, and gwen keyes, just attorney of dekalb county, georgia, is with us tonight. andrew, the gag order challenge facing all of these judges seems to be not what is the first stage penalty, but what is the penalty that will work? we've seen the new york judge fined donald trump a total of what is now $15,000. i think we realize that's not gonna be particularly effective. but clearly, with this indictment now of someone issuing death threats directly to people involved in the prosecution, the judges in these cases, with their gag orders, have even more cause for taking them even more seriously. >> let me first start by saying that what your father said about the death threat is exactly what an fbi agent said to me when i received my first death threat, which was basically, you know what, if it was serious, they would've called. which isn't, i have to say, the first time you have a death threat, not what you want to hear. you want them to be taken more seriously than that. i think that also is the point, which is that these kinds of threats, with respect to family members of jurors, of people who work for the court, or families are intended to have that effect, especially, also, for witnesses who then will be reluctant to come forward and testify, it's quite pernicious as well as scary, as you never know, and it just takes one erratic lone wolf. but to your point, i do think that how the courts response to donald trump's testing of them, what you read about his truth social posts, are so reminiscent as to what he did with justice and gordon in new york, which is something that deliberately am big u.s. and clearly the intent is there and means that the judge is going to have to be vigilant and they're going to have to do more than simply increasing the fine for instance 1000 to $10, 000, because i think donald trump will sniff out the weakness and will test the judges, and so i think that both of these judges are going to have to have a very stiff backbone in order to have meaningful sanctions, because they have to protect these participants and the integrity of the process, which all of us are entitled to a fair process. remember, the government is entitled to, and the public's entitled to it, not just the defendant. >> we neal, donald trump to the process of appealing one of the gag orders, the washington d.c. gag order. appealing that through the federal appeals process. will the federal indictment in atlanta, for these threats against the local atlanta prosecution team, could those find their way into pleadings by the prosecution in this appeal so that the federal appeals judges are firmly aware, through this pleading, that this is part of the stakes here? >> absolutely, lawrence. with respect to trump's appealed to the d.c. circuit, good luck with that. i don't think he has a chance in the world in winning that appeal. he may win something marginal around the edges, but before judge chutkan, who wrote the initial gag order opinion, before she ruled, during the time she ruled, after the time she ruled, i tell you, no one has made a more compelling case for the need for the gag order than i guiding donald trump. he provided the very best evidence against his appeal, and it's absolutely the case that the judge in d.c. are going to take cognizance of what's going on in georgia. they are going to even look probably at this threat that you've been talking about today, because a threat like what happened in georgia doesn't happen in a vacuum. it's fueled day in and day out by former president on trump's dangerous rhetoric online. and so i think that as we escalate, the punishments for violating the gag orders and so on, i agree with you that money alone is not going to be enough. jail time is obviously the kind of possibility that is being held out right now. but i think judge chutkan has a more limited option, which she has already talked about in the earlier hearings, which is, look, trump, if you keep saying the kind of stuff you're doing and scaring witnesses and attacking prosecutors, the result is going to be, i'm going to move the court date up. and she's absolutely within her rights to do that and would never be the subject of a viable appeal for trump. and so i think that's another tool that she has, and i wouldn't be surprised if she's right in the next time that trump does. something >> gwen keyes, how do you suppose that this death threat that we now know about what is received, taken, processed by your friend, district journey fani willis? >> well, unfortunately many prosecutors are used to these types of threats. when i was dea i had escorts accompany me. my predecessor had escorts accompany me. even greater security based on high profile case. he was handling, and so obviously i think even though steps pale in comparison to what d.a. willis and her team i currently having to deploy to protect their safety. and so while it is an unfortunate part of the job, i think the key thing here is that these charges, this indictment, one, will hold the person accountable, and obviously the person is innocent until proven guilty. but accountability is important because that then leads to a deterrent effect. so what do you want is these types of threats to stop. and one of the ways that you do that is holding people accountable who actually make them. >> andrew, we've seen the deterrent effect among potentially violent trump supporters after the january 6th prosecutions swooped down on these people. donald trump begged them to show up in manhattan for his first indictment, and they did not show up. and the two dozen people who did were not even slightly violent. same thing in florida, same thing in georgia. nothing. and it appears as though that massive federal prosecution of those hundreds of trump supporters for january 6th as had some kind of serious deterrent effect about what they're doing now, every time donald trump gets arrested and indicted, and this phone call indictment, you would hope could have a similar kind of effect. >> yes. that is definitely why these cases are broad. and i agree with you that the january six cases appear to have had quite a significant deterrent effect, as well as, of course, holding people to account for really horrendous crime to our democracy. however, the number of threats that the secret service, the fbi, the department of homeland security have to deal with, is far outstrips the known criminal cases that we are seeing. it is off the charts in terms of what we are seeing, and that is promulgated because of the former presidents words. so it only takes one lone wolf to act, and i understand that not all actors are doing this with the intent to act, but if you are in law enforcement you do not operate under that assumption, because if it's one out of 100, that's one too many, and because of the volume, that means that some of these are real. so you have to respond to all of them. you have to take them all seriously. because these are people who, the people being threatened are people who are just doing their job. and it really has an incredibly pernicious effect on the justice system. so even with everything, lawrence, it still is a huge problem for law enforcement. >> i completely agree with your. point i don't mean to suggest these are not serious crimes and serious threats, and the problem, is you never know which one is the real one. >> exactly. >> but somewhere out there there is a real. one andrew weissmann, neil cattle, glenn keys, thank you all very much for starting off our conversation this evening. and when we come back, we'll get the latest from israel, from the new york times. our reporter will be reporting live. eporting live oh... stuffed up again? so congested! you need sinex saline from vicks. just sinex, breathe, ahhhh! what is — wow! sinex. breathe. ahhhhhh! ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, but i manage it well. ♪ ♪ jardiance ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to tell. ♪ ♪ i take once-daily jardiance, ♪ ♪ at each day's staaart. ♪ ♪ as time went on it was easy to seee. ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c. ♪ jardiance works 24/7 in your body to flush out some sugar! and for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease, jardiance can lower the risk of cardiovascular death, too. jardiance may cause serious side effects including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, that can lead to sudden worsening of kidney function, and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare, life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction, and don't take it if you're on dialysis. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. ♪ jardiance is really swell, ♪ ♪ the little pill with a big story to tell.