0 the cards to do the job shop parts and more and rock dotcoms know the pro-life stories about who we are as a nation inside the history of its opponents and the decade long fight against abortion overturning roe the powerful new special screening now only on fox station. >> and welcome to hannity. we begin this friday night with a fox news alert. it is official roe v. wade is no more . and coming up, we'll have my full monologue and we're going to cut through all clutter hysteria. we will separate for you fact from fiction. there's a lot of lying, propaganda, misinformation, fear mongering going. we'll tell you the truth that the media purposely ignores. but first, let's take you to the ground where protests now are breaking out all across the country at this hour, including some calls for a night of rage and violence here outside the supreme court. our own kevin is with us. kevin , what's going on ? it's interesting. if you had been here earlier in the day, you would have seen a very, very different crowd. we're talking about primarily female. i'm a step out of the way so you can see it. it was mostly female, mostly young, very peaceful. but as is often the case in circumstances like this , sean, as the day goes on , the crowd begins to change just a bit more young men show off more people, tactical gear and masks and glasses, dark glasses, shades and that sort of thing. and somehow it changes the tone of what you're seeing. but thus far all day long it has been it has been peaceful and we expect it to stay that way. hopefully because there's a rather large law enforcement presence along the fence line, at least about 60 that we've seen uniformed officers. obviously there are more officers that are plainclothes within the crowd who are hoping for the best. but thus far we've seen a lot of people passion, some prayer and mostly peaceful protesting . we'll keep an eye on it for you. but for now, back to you. kevin , any word on whether or not president biden authorized calling up national guard troops if needed? i have actually heard that . i have not confirmed that . the good question as soon as i can nail that down, i'll let you know. i will tell you this just over there, which you can't quite see because of the tree line probably sean. there are at least a dozen, maybe two dozen uniformed officers with shield and helmets and riot gear. when i drove up here , i noticed there were several military personnel carriers as well. so there is possible that that's the case. i haven't been able to lock that down. of course, as we see any i promise to let you know. all right, kevin , thank you as always. great report. we turn now to chicago where our own mike tobin is standing by there tonight . mike , what's the latest on the ground in chicago? well, i certainly brought out a lot of numbers and a lot of passion in downtown chicago. this is federal plaza where the demonstrations started tonight and essentially what they've done is taken a big march all through downtown not only with the blessing of police but governor j.b. pritzker got out with the women in march and i say women because what makes this demonstration remarkable is it's almost entirely women. i ballpark the male population in this crowd somewhere around 5% with the women i've spoken with out here . they say they felt very disempowered when the decision came down. so their choice to come out here and demonstrate was to gather up in numbers and feel empowered again. they're pretty straightforward . they say they want to send a message to the elected officials that they are indeed a powerful voting bloc and the elected officials are going to have to keep that in mind as far as the way the march has gone. nothing along the lines of threatening behavior, anything that would make you think that things would get violent. the worst we've seen is a couple of vulgar signs and some vulgar john . all right, mike tobin from chicago tonight . thank you . we'll bring you updates from those protests all night tonight . now despite the hysteria on the left, the supreme court ruling was a momentous decision that returns abortion law back to the states where it belongs as it is not enumerated in the constitution like the right to keep and bear arms, which we discussed at length last night. now some states with the most liberal abortion laws that even allow third trimester abortions take a look at a map. they will continue to allow them. that will include alaska, colorado, new jersey, new mexico, oregon, vermont, washington, d.c. so while democrats in the media mob predictably demagoguing and lying about this very ruling, we'll give you the facts straight up, let you decide first, let us be very clear . this decision does not make abortion in america illegal. it does not. i know implying that they're saying it even but it does not . instead, individual voters you will now decide abortion abortion law at the state level per the 10th amendment of our constitution. and remember powers that are not enumerated in the constitution like the right to keep and bear arms are reserved for the states. so again in liberal states there will be few if any restrictions on abortion in some cases up until the very moment of birth. in fact, most states will continue to allow abortion at some level it might be some restrictions in one state, different ones in another state. here's the second fact about this ruling abortion was never enshrined in the us constitution as a right and it was never codified in law. instead it became the status for 50 years because of activist judges pretending that they were the legislative branch of government supposed to be separate coequal branches. they're not sometimes, as greg jarrett rightly pointed a great column on fox news on roe v. wade is just one of more than two hundred and thirty times that the court has overruled this precious precedent that we often hear democrats talking about that would include plessy vs. ferguson. that's what legalized segregation. yeah, that precedent was done away with rightly so. and that awful dred scott decision that upheld slavery. another example in other words, overturning a precedent is not uncommon and in many cases as he just described, the right thing to do. now naturally roe v. wade was always at the mercy of the courts. but don't take my word for listen to far left hero of the left socialist or so justice ruth bader ginsburg. take a listen. will became a symbol i think for the right to life movement . both had a single target to hit that this decision is most undemocratic decision by nine justices who nobody elected in to make policy for the country. my criticism of roe is that it seemed to stop the momentum which was the momentum wasn't on the side of change. now ginsburg's prediction has come true . she was right. roe has now been overturned and now this brings us to our third fact about today's ruling the court's decision today is about abortion and abortion alone. it's not about contraception, not about gay rights. it's not about interracial marriage. as many have been suggesting and lying about. in fact, the majority opinion makes this quite clear quote to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize our decision concerns the constitution right to an abortion and no other right nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. now. naturally, the media mob democrats, they're kind of conveniently ignoring the truth, the facts, the text in the ruling. now why let truth get in the way of a great political narrative sort of like january six ? they want to use abortion just like yesterday's supreme court ruling on the second amendment as a wedge issue to fire up their base in the hopes that they may mitigate the pending losses many are predicting. so according to them, america is in peril, all because of evil republicans and of course donald trump . >> take a look. this is a devastating ruling as can be imagined. this is of course, that is just upended a half century of law of a constitutionally protected right to abortion that affects nearly every family across america in one way or another. listen, it's a heartbreaking betrayal of half of the country watching the women there. it's emotional new debate over other rights that we thought were settled the right to contraception, the right to same-sex marriage, all of those are thrown into question today. this is going to be a legal civil war between the states. this is monumental because it's the first time we've seen the court take away a right. there really is a lot of people who believe this is a rigged court. all right. top democrats were just as dramatic and even more shameless with a ploy to turn this ruling into votes in november. take a look for yourself. this fall must have like more senators, representatives who codify a woman's right to choose in the federal law once again elect more state leaders to protect this right at the local level, we need to restore the protections of roe as law of the land. we need to elect officials who will do that this fall. roe is on the ballot. personal freedoms are on the ballot. aware of this , the republicans are plotting a nationwide abortion ban. they cannot be allowed to have a majority in the congress. you have the power to elect leaders who will defend and protect your rights. and as the president said earlier today with your vote you can act and you have the final word. >> remember, they can't run on the great state of the economy because we have a forty one year year high of inflation. they can't run on gas prices because we set record after record after record and it's still going higher. they can't run on their foreign policy. they can't run on the damage they've done to our borders. but that's this is what they're going to run on the telegraph's it they're saying it would be quite clear where they're headed with this and it gets worse. hillary clinton tweeted today that today's opinion will live in infamy. meanwhile, nancy pelosi followed her rant about the election with a dramatic reading of a poll. >> take a look. from time to time , i quote this poem by hit minoff here is my home. i will not be silent for my country has changed her face . the country has changed her face. i shall not give up on her. i shall remind her and sing into her ears until she opens her eyes. clearly we hope that the supreme court will open its eyes now pelosi of course the speaker in name only but the real speaker of the house, congresswoman alexandria cosio cortez, was even more distraught today. take a look for yourself with a supreme court justice that they chose to endanger the lives of all women and all burdened people in this country. but not only that, they've chosen to strip rights for men to because frankly the right to our own bodies and the rights of our families. this is this is something that belongs to all of us . eeoc also that went on and predicted that people will die because of the court's decision and even joined the protest outside of the supreme court calling for people to take to the streets at the same demonstration or comrade maxine waters call for an insurrection against the court. >> take a look. you ain't seen nothing yet. women are dying on their backs no matter how they try to stop it. they have with the supreme court we will decide them. women will be about now thankfully their offenses heavily armed guards in riot gear around the court. they're there for a reason. ever since the majority opinion was leaked, the justices have been targeted with harassment, threats of violence and by the way, no condemnation from the democrats. joe biden, his press secretary, other democrats, their addresses have been published online. protesters showing up at their home at their homes. the man traveling from calev fornia to the front door of justice cavanaugh and what was an attempt at a an assassination, a plot to assassinate him? we have in the case of amy coni barrett, you got the name of us kids school and location, the church she goes to the time she goes to church. wow. radicals have vandalized dozens of anti-abortion pregnancy centers all across the u.s. breaking windows, lighting fires, spray painting the message if abortions are unsafe, then neither are you now a militant group named james revenge that took credit for many of these attacks is calling for tonight to be a night and a summer of rage. the group declared, quote, open season on pro-life americans claiming that it was fun and easy to attack conservatives even hinted at future attacks that might be much worse than fire graffiti. and yet maxine waters, other democrats, the media mob, they're not calling for calm and said they're whipping up their radicals supporters into a frenzy tonight . it's almost as if they don't actually respect our institutions. and let's not forget it wasn't that long ago. joe biden himself was very much against abortion. take a look. tell me about abortion. where where do you stand and how will you face that issue as it's going to be very difficult. i do not view abortion as a as a choice and a right. i think it's always a tragedy. >> and now with more, he's on the ground in new york for us tonight, our own lawrence jones lj, what's going on in new york city? hey, good evening. sounds you picked up where chuck schumer was attacking cavanaugh said that you were ruled the day. well, the protesters about 5000. i haven't seen that many protesters since the summer riots are on their way right now to chuck schumer's home, the protests in front of his home. i don't know if this is the standard solidaire. chuck schumer, we still haven't heard any calls from police or the condemnation of his past comments after that sound bite that he said led to one person to actually make their way to this cabinet house and what we know to be attempted assassination, of course we end up turning himself in to authorities. but these protests right now have been mostly peaceful. we saw some vandalism on some statues earlier today, but they're marching about 4000 of them on their way to chuck schumer's home. and again, we still don't know who is the person that leaked those documents. we do have the decision now. but of course the person that lit the match, chuck schumer, as well as that leaker that put that leaked document out from the public, i think they're getting what they want tonight . sean, i'll send it back to you in new york. so you're saying that people are marching and chuck schumer is home? i would say anybody that calls themselves or identifies themselves as a conservative turn around and go home, stay away from a politician tone that is an extraordinarily dangerous thing to do and a dumb thing to do, just like what he did on the steps of the supreme court was done. well, we you're exactly the people. i just want to know that the people that are on their way to chuck schumer's home, they are liberal activists. they are shouting no justice, no peace. my body, my choice. these are progressives. so i guess he's going to go there to cheer them on . lj, thank you . we'll be checking in with you throughout the night. here now with reaction, law professor fox news contributor jonathan turley is with us. i want to make sure from the legal perspective that the analysis that we're giving is is accurate. now there is an enumerated right to keep and bear arms that would justify yesterday's decision on the second amendment. there is no enumerated right when it comes to the constitution, but our framers in their wisdom anticipated such conflicts or moments and hence we have the 10th amendment to a certain extent i would argue the ninth amendment that sends issues like this back to the state which seems appropriate in this case, which is why i've always felt that roe is bad law. your thoughts? >> well, you know, this is part of what the court was grappling with . people talk about roe v. wade as if it's an inviolate decision. in fact, roe v. wade itself was gutted that privacy based analysis that came out of the 1973 opinion was later removed in casey and there was a substitute which gave us the undue burdens standard. but roe was criticized by many liberal academics. i mean, people like laurence tribe called it a smokescreen. as you saw ginsburg herself said it went too far . so this was an inviolate decision. it wasn't a decision that was widely accepted in terms of its analysis. there are arguments that can be made under the constitution for this privacy or equal protection or due process right . but the court clearly didn't see that and their argument was not that abortion should be unlawful. they're not saying anything about what should happen to abortion. they're saying more who should make that decision. and they said in the opinion that in 1973 they essentially stopped a political debate that was going on in the country and what they said today was have added have that debate, have thirty three thousand three hundred and thirty thousand million americans make the decision rather than nine justices and you're going to see a variation among the states most are likely to protect the right to abortion. i'll remind you, by the way, sean, that in 1973, 30 states when roe was handed down prohibited abortion and all but the most limited exceptions. so the country has moved the issue. but this issue is now going to move back to the country and people will make this decision state by state. is it a fair statement to say that the odds are zero that abortion is going to be illegal in the united states knowing the current makeup of new york and new jersey and illinois and california and even knowing, for example, mississippi which which brought this before the supreme court, they just had a regulation state regulation of 15 weeks. is that a fair statement? yes. in fact, the majority of people in this country are virtually guaranteed to live in a state where abortion is not going to be unlawful. you're going to have states like california, new york , illinois that are obviously going to remain robustly protective states and then even states with the republican governors like like virginia today senator young said, look, i'd like to pursue mississippi like rule. and he says but i'm also willing to compromise. let's talk let's see what a reasonable compromise is. that was part of the vision that framers had for the federalism model is that with 50 states today working on problems, there's a chance you can come up with creative compromises out of all of that experimentation can become can come a resolution. and so i think that what you're going to see is you're going to have a number of states in the short term that are going to move on these trigger laws that are going to ban abortion except in very limited circumstances but in the majority for the majority of people in this country. the post roe world will not be dramatically different from the roe world in the sense that they're living in states where that right will be protected. let me let me play for you chuck schumer on the steps of the supreme court and i want to get your thoughts on this. >> i want to tell you what i want to tell you. kavanaugh you have really legal whirlwind and you ride you know what to do, go forward with these awful decisions you've released a whirlwind. you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you. jonathan turley, you're a great lawyer. if that was me on the steps of the supreme court, why do i think there be consequences that i'd have to face as a result of saying something like that ? and i don't think you can get me. that was one that was one of the lowest points that i have witnessed in my lifetime in terms of the supreme court and how it is being treated to have and now senate majority leader making threats, calling two justices by name really shocked all of us . and this is in an age of rag