-- plagued the president in lots of different ways. we're going to see what happens next here. there was a delegation of diplomats set to meet with the national security adviser today, this afternoon, to talk about the hostages that are from their countries. we also know that there was a delegation slated to go to the middle east next week as well to engage in some more talks and conversations around a deal coming together, and so the administration still has this very robust presence in trying to make this happen, and we'll be looking to see whether there's a response to any degree from hamas in the days to come. >> aaron gilchrist, thank you for that. claire mccaskill, i want to go to you. i want to talk about the president's statements, they were forceful but brief on donald trump's trial and conviction. you spent many years in the senate. if i'm remembering correctly, you were on the armed services committee, homeland security committee. this is an area of the world that you know well. and that you legislated in and around, and i just want to get your take on what we heard from the president in that regard. >> well, this was bold for him to announce this before it came from israel. it was a bold move. and assuming that he would never do this without israel signing off on it, i think this is a big win for him. assuming that when the sun goes down tomorrow in israel netanyahu backs him up and says this is what we have agreed to, if this cease fire happens, and if the hostages are returned, and if the u.s. remains involved in terms of keeping the peace and rebuilding gaza, this is a huge headache that maybe joe biden just took some serious advil or tylenol or headache medicine for, if this actually comes to pass, and i think it is a big deal for his campaign, if in fact this deal happens. as to the trump trial, i think he did exactly what he should do. he went after the dangerous precedent that trump and his supporters are engaging in, which is to tear down the institution that protects every american under the institution, and that is our rule of law, and i thought he did a good job of that. didn't dwell on trump's conduct but rather the very dangerous thing the republican party is doing, which is tearing apart the institution that protects everyone. >> and this is the first time that he's spoken out. he has been very careful not to speak during the trial, but for him to come out so forcefully, to do it before his middle east comments, not waiting for a question, as we assumed, we all assumed he would do it as an add on. to come out and say, no man is above the law. donald trump was given every opportunity to defend himself and was defended and he had a jury of 12 american citizens, just like you, men and women, you know, and in fact, he had choices, and in fact, we pointed out they only used one peremptory challenge on the jury. >> there was a line, that's how the system works. he went before a jury of his peers. he could have testified if he wanted to. there were five weeks of evidence. it was a unanimous verdict and he can appeal, this is who we are, he said. >> yeah, it was necessary for him to do it. you could imagine a situation, i'm going to be above this, i'm going to focus on the israel deal. he needed to do both. obviously the israel issue is going to have huge ramifications on this election and the region. he had to speak clearly about how this was dangerous, reckless, irresponsible, the way republicans are acting. >> has the ship sailed on the president and israel on the people so firmly against the war and call him genocide joe. are they ever going to come back? does he need those people and is there an acknowledgment that a president trump, a renewed president trump wouldn't be better, would in fact, probably be worse given the positions that he has taken on israel and on settlements and moving the embassy to jerusalem. >> speaking crassly and politically, these two issues are tied together for him. he has to make a negative case against donald trump, president biden does. that's how he can win some of these people back. he has a coalition that ranges from people that have a nikki haley level view, that want to level gaza, to people who think joe biden is committing genocide. all of those people need to vote for joe biden for him to win this year. in order to do that, he can't win by a positive israel solution. it has to be a negative case against donald trump. >> another netanyahu speech to a joint meeting of congress, having been invited by the speaker, and chuck schumer has signed on to it. this is not something the white house welcomes at all. we know what happened during the obama years, and he used that platform to campaign against the white house and the iran nuclear deal. this is a preemptive action against netanyahu, especially with netanyahu listening, as katy was saying, to his right wing coalition members who do control his -- >> his political fate and criminal fate as well. because he's facing -- >> an analogy as well. >> come to go a head at the time that there's going to be a debate. >> oh, that. >> i was going to say, a couple of weeks, and when he's going to get sentenced in that too. >> peter, claire, tim, thank you so much. a lot of breaking news. up next in the wake of president biden's comments, we're going to dig into the big questions about what exactly this guilty verdict means politically, legally, and personally for the former president. our special coverage continues after this. verage continues teafr this (aaron) i own a lot of businesses... so i wear a lot of hats. my restaurants, my tattoo shop... and i also have a non-profit. but no matter what business i'm in... my network and my tech need to keep up. thank you verizon business. (kevin) now our businesses get fast and reliable internet from the same network that powers our phones. (waitress) all with the security features we need. (aaron) because my businesses are my life. man, the fish tacos are blowing up! so whatever's next... we're cooking with fire. let's make it happen! (vo) switch to the partner businesses rely on. when you put in the effort, but it starts to frizz... you skipped a step. tresemmé silk serum. use before styling for three days of weightlessly smooth hair that frizz can't beat. new tresemmé keratin smooth collection. since my citi custom cash® card automatically adjusts to earn me more cash back in my top eligible category... suddenly life's feeling a little more automatic. like doors opening wherever i go... [sound of airplane overhead] even the ground is moving for me! y'all seeing this? wild! and i don't even have to activate anything. oooooohhh... automatic sashimi! earn cash back that automatically adjusts to how you spend with the citi custom cash® card. [mind blown explosion noise] old spice gentleman's super hydration body wash. (whispered) vanilla and shea. 24/7 moisturization with vitamin b3. (knock on the door) are you using all the old spice? oops. ♪ (old spice mnemonic) ♪ all—new subway wraps are packed with delicious ingredients in a pillowy lavash wrap. finally a refreshing lunch that tastes deli— perfect for pro athletes like me, right? can i finish? try all—new wraps from subway today. shop etsy until june 16th and get up to 30% off father's day gifts that go beyond the classic go-to. but if it's another hat he wants, get one that truly fits. order until june 16th for up to 30% off personalized gear, kitchen tools, travel accessories, and other things dads dig. when you want a one-of-a-kind gift to show him he's #1. etsy has it. welcome to the wayborhood. with wayfair, finding your style is fun. [ music playing ] yes! when the music stops grab any chair, it doesn't matter if it's your outdoor style or not. [ music stops ] i'm sorry, carl. this is me in chair form. i don't see you. -oh, come on. this one's perfect for you. but you. love it. i told you we should have done a piñata. i explained it so many times. um-hum. they're not sitting. -and it rocks... you need to sit down. ♪ wayfair. every style. every home. ♪ nexium 24hr prevents heartburn acid before it begins. get all-day and all-night heartburn acid prevention with just one pill a day. choose acid prevention. choose nexium. craig here pays too much for verizon wireless. so he sublet half his real estate office... choose acid prevention. [ bird squawks loudly ] to a pet shop. meg's moving company uses t-mobile. so she scaled down her fleet to save money. and don's paying so much for at&t, he's been waiting to update his equipment! there's a smarter way to save. comcast business mobile. you could save up to 70% on your wireless bill. so you don't have to compromise. powering smarter savings. powering possibilities. we are back with our special coverage, and just moments ago, president biden weighed in for the first time on donald trump's guilty verdict. >> it's reckless, it's dangerous, it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years, and it literally is the corner stone of america. our justice system. the justice system should be respected. and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. it's as simple as that. that's america. that's who we are. and that's who we'll always be, god willing. >> now, there are three huge questions at the center of everything that we're talking about in terms of the trial today. how will donald trump's verdict inform the political process moving forward. will it change his approach to his legal future, three more criminal cases, plus the sentencing in this one, and the personal impact on the former president. and, katy, you and i were talking about this. in some ways it's all tied together, how his move could impact how he approaches both the politics and the court cases. >> yeah, but the apparatus, as i argue is there bolstering him, pushing forward with the plan no matter what. we all three spent time inside that courtroom watching the first criminal trial of a former president, now the first former president, president period, to be convicted of multiple felonies. but the verdict is in the end, we are still many months away from the election, and donald trump is saying that the vote is going to be the election or the vote is going to be the verdict. >> it's been a long hour. >> the real verdict is coming up in the vote. >> november 5th. >> this is sentencing, by the way, which is just a few days before the rnc convention. >> and joining us now are two people who spent even more time inside that courthouse. andrew weissmann, former fbi general counsel, former senior member of the mueller probe and an msnbc legal analyst, and msnbc legal analyst, lisa rubin. so, andrew, first to you. take it 30,000 feet view of all of this. what does this verdict, what we've seen for the last six plus weeks, seven weeks now, the verdict, the response, we've now heard a response from donald trump and president biden. these are the two candidates. that's not going to change. what does that tell you about where we are as a country, and the respect for law, and what are the danger zones ahead? >> so the hard part of this is that all of us at this table saw the trial. we were there. we witnessed it. we could see who was called as a witness. we saw the cross-examination, the witnesses were in large part, allies of donald trump. it was david pecker who was not really cross examined and called a liar by donald trump. one of the witnesses who was the leadoff witness, one of the most damaging witnesses. one of only two witnesses, the jury said we would like a read back. that is somebody aligned with donald trump, and at no point during the lengthy defense summation did they say david pecker is a liar. they don't believe him. and yet, they don't like the result, and suddenly, first we went from, you know, the election was rigged, now the trial is rigged. i'm reminded of when hillary clinton said, you know, when he didn't get an emmy, the emmys are rigged. if you lose, it's rigged. if you win, it's fair. it's just the same light motif, again, and again. but what's hard is that we were all there, and so we know, in fact, that the judge was fair. we know that the witnesses were, as they should be, had to testify on direct and be subject to lengthy cross-examination, and this is a jury decision of 12 new yorkers where donald trump used to live and lived for many many years, so it's certainly his peers. >> the seriousness. we all saw it. when they came in on the last day for the jury instruction, and i was in there, didn't look at donald trump. looked straight ahead. looked at the entire time, either looked at juan merchan or were taking notes. there was a sense of seriousness of purpose. no distraction. no looking around. this was, it seemed to me, almost a lesson of the power of the people that 12 ordinary manhattanites, and donald trump doesn't think they're ordinary, he thinks they came in against him. but 12 people who gave up their days and weeks and privacy now because they believe in the system. >> yeah, and you know who else believes in the system or at least he believes in the system a few days ago is todd blanche who opened his summation by exalting the power of the jury, starting by thanking them for their time and their attention and then reminding them that the decider ultimately of the facts in the case was not the judge or a group of judges but them. and yet last night, there he is on the cnn saying that always it was clear to him that his client was never going to get a fair trial. and when he was pressed on that by the host of the program, he ultimately said what was unfair about it was the veneer, meaning where the trial was situated here in manhattan. not anything wrong with those 12 particular jurors. he still can't bring himself to criticize those 12 particular people. he won't criticize the process. it's just there's something fundamentally about the water in the city, apparently, that doesn't suit them. >> he seemed to be blaming his client. we had all inferred with a lot of reason to do that that donald trump was influencing the way his defense was organized, decisions that were made. robert costello being put on the stand, which was clearly a big mistake, and he said that himself in an interview, which, i thought was strange, and it was an interview on fox, to suggest that, well, that was the defendant's fault. he's the lawyer. i don't know how much longer, katy, you referred to this earlier, as they head down to florida, because they have some pretrial hearings before judge cannon on the mar-a-lago documents case, how much longer he will be the lawyer. >> alina habba is still his lawyer and she helped lose him half a billion dollars. answer that, lisa. >> look, i think todd was in between a rock and a hard place in answering that question because of who his particular client is. if he takes ownership of all of those decisions, you also have on the other side, as your client, somebody who was famously micro managerial who has a fragile ego, who wants to be entrusted with the decisions in the case, and of course, ethically, your client is allowed to direct their defense, and so i feel for him in that moment because had he taken it all on himself, not only is that probably inaccurate, but he also may have faced greater client complaints. what do you mean you made the decisions yourself. i'm the master mind and that's a client that believes the defense is the right one. i don't share that opinion. i think that's donald trump's genuine one. >> the thing that struck me, andrew and lisa, was him saying he was gagged, therefore he didn't testify. he seemed to conflate things. he was given the chance. it was made clear, the judge, in fact, in open court made sure he agreed with that, and he nodded. >> absolutely. he made that comment early on. the judge in court corrected him, and donald trump, as he's the to do at the end of court dates said that. this was just going back to, i mean, this is like facts don't matter. this is really earth 2. just so everybody understands that donald trump had a right to testify. it was stressed by the judge that he could have hopped on the stand and testified any day of the week, and it was his choice not to do that. so just to be clear, at trial, he has an absolute right not to testify. what he doesn't have a right to do is say outside of court, oh, i didn't have an opportunity to do that. he had an opportunity to testify. he had an opportunity to cross examine david pecker. he had an opportunity to cross examine hope hicks. both of those witnesses provided devastating evidence. they were not cross examined to say that they were lying. there was a choice he made, and so now to say don't believe the process, these were in many ways his allies giving the most damming evidence. >> we talked about the other day, i called this a novel case. you said it wasn't a novel case. elie honig, former federal prosecutor, he argued in new york magazine that this was really a bespoke case, that these charges were tailored for one particular defendant, and that was donald trump. he talked about how the judge gave a small amount of money to a democratic group, but that still is against the rules. he shouldn't have done it. he talked about how district attorney alvin bragg ran in some ways as a man who would go after donald trump. he understands the arguments that donald trump and his team are making that this was not fair. when you went through this elie honig argument about how this case could be ripe for appeal, and the way that it was tailored to donald trump, what's your opinion on that? how do you see it, andrew? >> i think this is fair. it's useful to go through these -- i'm really happy you're raising them. let me give you quick responses that you would hear. first, on the money, there's no question that juan merchan, i mean, we're talking about -- >> $34, very small. >> it is diminutive. he said there's no reason to get off the case for that. >> they being the ethics panel. >> and he was randomly chosen for the case the way aileen cannon was in florida. >> absolutely. and all of us were in that courtroom. does anyone -- i mean, we were saying this before we knew what the verdict was that this was a fair process. we were making sure that all of our viewers knew in case this was an acquittal that this was a fair process. so it happens to have been a conviction. >> what about the charges and the way that they elevated it from misdemeanor to a felony? >> sure. so with respect to -- can i just do the bragg comment. >> go ahead. >> because that's simply not the case. it is missing the number one thing that the d.a. did when he took office, which is to say, i am not bringing this case. it is not ready. and he took enormous flak, and now, you know what, he has a right to sort of -- he had a right to say, i told you so at that press conference, and he didn't. he took the high road. this is a man who, what you see what you get. this is somebody who's the real deal. when the case wasn't ready, he said no. that is the clear factual response to that question. >> i want to ask youquickly about alvin bragg, he made a choice not to do any interviews. he made a statement. he didn't take any questions, unlike the defense attorney who was on multiple networks, answered lots of questions. i wonder what you think is happening there. >> i think they have different roles. and i think that the prosecutor without, you know, i would say, is much more in the sort of jack smith, bob mueller mode of i'm going to speak in court. and even though he had a right to, and they said you know what, this is an ongoing process, and i'm not going to do it. >> can we go to the last part. >> good. thanks. >> i'm really interested in the answer. >> it's like oral argument, where you always h