and he took another quick wicket to leave india reeling at 10—2. but in the end, an assured 50 from suryakumar guided them to victory with ten balls to spare. england cricket coach matthew mott says he hopesjosh hazlewood's comments were "tongue in cheek" after the australian bowler suggested they could potentially have a hand in knocking england out at the group stage of the competition. australia reached the super 8s unbeaten after a nine—wicket win over namibia, leaving england and scotland to fight it out for second place in the group. australia play scotland next, and the scots�* run—rate could see them through. in this tournament, you could potentially come up against england again. as you said, they are probably one of the top few teams, you know, we have had some newcomers in t20 cricket. if we can get them in the tournament, and it's in our best interest as well, yeah, interesting to see. never been in this position before as a team, i don't think, so whether we have discussions or not, we willjust try to play it the way we do tonight. they will be up to people, not me. and here's what matthew mott had to say about the comments. i'm going to be totally honest here, i haven't heard them in the context. i was informed about them this morning, but knowing josh, he's got a pretty dry sense of humour. i'm hoping it was very much tongue—in—cheek. i don't think it's ever going to play out. i think having grown up in australia, the will to win every game that you're in, i'm sure that will come to the fore. i'm very much hoping it wasjust an offhand remark by a really good bloke who's having fun. football now, borussia dortmund captain emre can has been given a late call—up to the germany squad for the european championship. the former liverpool man replaces bayern munich's alexander pavlovic, who was forced to pull out with tonsilitis. pavlovic only made his national debut on the 3rd ofjune, but was named injulian nagelsmann�*s squad for the tournament. the hosts kick off their euro 2024 campaign on friday against scotland, who are now well settled into their base in garmisch—partenkirchen. midfielder billy gilmour is looking forward to testing himself against the likes of toni kroos, and with the competition getting ever closer, the brighton player is embracing the excitement. scotland's so passionate, especially about football. we're all rooting for their country, and everyone wants us to do well. and for us, we want to give it everything we've got to get back to ourfans, and loads of scottish fans coming over. we know there will be loads at home as well watching. there's a real buzz around the country. i thank you can tell that straightaway, everything you see. england, meanwhile, prepare to face serbia in gelsinkirchen on sunday, and one player who could feature is adam wharton. it's been an incredible year so far for the crystal palace midfielder. injanuary, he was playing in a blackburn rovers side struggling in the championship. fast forward five months, and the 20—year—old is in the mix for a starting spot at england's opening euro 2024 match. it's a surreal feeling. honestly i was not — it's a surreal feeling. honestly i was not really expecting it. obviously i've onlyjust gone into the premier league so i was not expecting — the premier league so i was not expecting anything. more sort of a bonus_ expecting anything. more sort of a bonus kind — expecting anything. more sort of a bonus kind of thing if i did not get in, bonus kind of thing if i did not get in. so _ bonus kind of thing if i did not get in, so absolutely delighted. get to do what _ in, so absolutely delighted. get to do what i — in, so absolutely delighted. get to do what i love it the top stage, cannot— do what i love it the top stage, cannot beat it. two of the biggest names in tennis have been paired together for the doubles at the olympic games. the king of clay, rafa nadal, and reigning french open champion, carlos alcaraz, will represent spain in paris. the tennis, of course, being played at roland—garros, where nadal is a iii—time winner. and that's all the sport for now. as the war in ukraine goes on, there are questions about international support for kyiv. nato chiefjens stoltenberg has said that the alliance is set to take control over the planning of of arms deliveries to ukraine. speaking ahead of a meeting of nato defence ministers in brussels tomorrow, mr stoltenberg said it was vital to maintain support for kyiv and send a strong signal to russia. it is seen as a strategic move ahead of november's us presidential election and concerns of a potential shift in us foreign policy. at this meeting, i expect that ministers will approve a plan for nato to lead the coordination of security assistance and training to ukraine. this is a key element for our package for ukraine at the washington summit along with long—term financial commitment. since russia's full—scale invasion in 2022, allies have provided a0 billion euros in military support to ukraine each year. we must maintain this level of support as a minimum and for as long as it takes. earlier in the day, mr stoltenberg was in budapest. there, hungarian prime minister viktor 0rban confirmed the country would not take part in nato—led efforts to provide security assistance for kyiv, but will not block them either. mr 0rban is moscow's closest ally in the european union. nato members are due to meet in washington next month to discuss long—term military and financial support for ukraine. mr 0rban spoke after the meeting and said hungary had been granted "everything it found necessary". translation: it's well-known that hungary's position - differs from the majority of nato member states. to the question of how to move from this war situation to peace in the shortest possible way, hungary gives different answers than the others. hungary acknowledges that the weight and number of different opinions are significant. for more on this, we can speak to ivo daalder, former us ambassador to nato and now chief executive officer of the chicago council on global affairs. thank you for being on the programme. let's start first of all with nato taking control of what they say the planning of arms deliveries. this is essentially them taking control before a potential change in who is in the white house come november.— change in who is in the white house come november. well, that's part of it. this is come november. well, that's part of it- this is a — come november. well, that's part of it. this is a coalition _ come november. well, that's part of it. this is a coalition that _ come november. well, that's part of it. this is a coalition that has - come november. well, that's part of it. this is a coalition that has in - it. this is a coalition that has in fact— it. this is a coalition that has in fact been— it. this is a coalition that has in fact been led _ it. this is a coalition that has in fact been led by— it. this is a coalition that has in fact been led by the _ it. this is a coalition that has in fact been led by the united - fact been led by the united states and was _ fact been led by the united states and was pulled _ fact been led by the united states and was pulled together— fact been led by the united states and was pulled together by- fact been led by the united states and was pulled together by the i and was pulled together by the united — and was pulled together by the united states, _ and was pulled together by the united states, chaired - and was pulled together by the united states, chaired up- and was pulled together by the united states, chaired up to i and was pulled together by the. united states, chaired up to this point _ united states, chaired up to this point by— united states, chaired up to this point by the _ united states, chaired up to this point by the secretary _ united states, chaired up to this point by the secretary of - united states, chaired up to this| point by the secretary of defence and often — point by the secretary of defence and often the _ point by the secretary of defence and often the chairman - point by the secretary of defence and often the chairman of- point by the secretary of defence l and often the chairman of the joint chiefs— and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of— and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. _ and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. but _ and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. but it _ and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. but it is _ and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. but it is not - and often the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. but it is not only. chiefs of staff. but it is not only a worry— chiefs of staff. but it is not only a worry about _ chiefs of staff. but it is not only a worry about whether- chiefs of staff. but it is not only a worry about whether a - chiefs of staff. but it is not only a worry about whether a new i a worry about whether a new administration _ a worry about whether a new administration would - a worry about whether a new. administration would continue a worry about whether a new - administration would continue that, it also— administration would continue that, it also makes— administration would continue that, it also makes sense _ administration would continue that, it also makes sense from _ administration would continue that, it also makes sense from not - administration would continue that, it also makes sense from not only. administration would continue that, it also makes sense from not only a practical— it also makes sense from not only a practical but — it also makes sense from not only a practical but a — it also makes sense from not only a practical but a long—term _ practical but a long—term perspective _ practical but a long—term perspective. nato- practical but a long—term perspective. nato is- practical but a long—terml perspective. nato is going practical but a long—term - perspective. nato is going to welcome _ perspective. nato is going to welcome ukraine _ perspective. nato is going to welcome ukraine as - perspective. nato is going to welcome ukraine as a - perspective. nato is going to. welcome ukraine as a member. perspective. nato is going to- welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that _ welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that it— welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that it witt— welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that it will become _ welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that it will become a _ welcome ukraine as a member. it has said that it will become a member. i said that it will become a member. he has— said that it will become a member. he has said — said that it will become a member. he has said just— said that it will become a member. he has said just as _ said that it will become a member. he has said just as the _ said that it will become a member. he has said just as the last - he has said just as the last summit that ukraine's — he has said just as the last summit that ukraine's future _ he has said just as the last summit that ukraine's future is _ he has said just as the last summit that ukraine's future is in _ he has said just as the last summit that ukraine's future is in data, - that ukraine's future is in data, and therefore _ that ukraine's future is in data, and therefore nato _ that ukraine's future is in data, and therefore nato should - that ukraine's future is in data, | and therefore nato should start taking _ and therefore nato should start taking over _ and therefore nato should start taking over more _ and therefore nato should start taking over more of— and therefore nato should start taking over more of these - taking over more of these responsibilities— taking over more of these responsibilities from - taking over more of these responsibilities from the i taking over more of these - responsibilities from the individual states _ responsibilities from the individual states so — responsibilities from the individual states so the _ responsibilities from the individual states. so the coordination - responsibilities from the individual states. so the coordination of - responsibilities from the individual states. so the coordination of aid i states. so the coordination of aid will be _ states. so the coordination of aid will be done _ states. so the coordination of aid will be done by— states. so the coordination of aid will be done by nato. _ states. so the coordination of aid will be done by nato. the - states. so the coordination of aid | will be done by nato. the training as you _ will be done by nato. the training as you heard _ will be done by nato. the training as you heard the _ will be done by nato. the training as you heard the secretary- will be done by nato. the training | as you heard the secretary general jens stoltenberg _ as you heard the secretary general jens stoltenberg say _ as you heard the secretary general jens stoltenberg say it, _ as you heard the secretary general jens stoltenberg say it, and - as you heard the secretary general jens stoltenberg say it, and also i jens stoltenberg say it, and also the building _ jens stoltenberg say it, and also the building of— jens stoltenberg say it, and also the building of ukraine's - jens stoltenberg say it, and also the building of ukraine's future i the building of ukraine's future that down— the building of ukraine's future that down the _ the building of ukraine's future that down the road _ the building of ukraine's future that down the road once - the building of ukraine's future that down the road once the i the building of ukraine's future - that down the road once the conflict has ended _ that down the road once the conflict has ended or— that down the road once the conflict has ended or at _ that down the road once the conflict has ended or at least _ that down the road once the conflict has ended or at least the _ that down the road once the conflict has ended or at least the fighting i has ended or at least the fighting has ended or at least the fighting has ended, — has ended or at least the fighting has ended, ensures— has ended or at least the fighting has ended, ensures that - has ended or at least the fighting has ended, ensures that ukrainel has ended or at least the fighting . has ended, ensures that ukraine will be safe, _ has ended, ensures that ukraine will be safe, secure _ has ended, ensures that ukraine will be safe, secure and _ has ended, ensures that ukraine will be safe, secure and capable - has ended, ensures that ukraine will be safe, secure and capable of- be safe, secure and capable of defending _ be safe, secure and capable of defending itself. _ be safe, secure and capable of defending itself. all— be safe, secure and capable of defending itself. all of- be safe, secure and capable of defending itself. all of that - be safe, secure and capable of| defending itself. all of that will now fati — defending itself. all of that will now fall under _ defending itself. all of that will now fall under a _ defending itself. all of that will now fall under a nato - defending itself. all of that will now fall under a nato in - defending itself. all of that will now fall under a nato in primel now fall under a nato in prime minister. _ now fall under a nato in prime minister, and _ now fall under a nato in prime minister, and that— now fall under a nato in prime minister, and that shows - now fall under a nato in prime minister, and that shows thatl now fall under a nato in prime - minister, and that shows that nato takes _ minister, and that shows that nato takes ukrainian— minister, and that shows that nato takes ukrainian security very - takes ukrainian security very seriously _ takes ukrainian security very seriously-— takes ukrainian security very seriousl . , ., ., , seriously. given how relatively simle it seriously. given how relatively simple it seems _ seriously. given how relatively simple it seems and _ seriously. given how relatively simple it seems and how - seriously. given how relatively simple it seems and how it - seriously. given how relatively. simple it seems and how it may seriously. given how relatively - simple it seems and how it may make more sense to have a combined, coordinated, joined up effort when it comes to tackling this key issue, why has it not been done before? well, it's not been there before because individual— well, it's not been there before because individual nations - well, it's not been there before because individual nations got i because individual nations got together— because individual nations got together to _ because individual nations got together to immediately- because individual nations got together to immediately helpl together to immediately help ukraine, _ together to immediately help ukraine, and— together to immediately help ukraine, and nato— together to immediately help ukraine, and nato wanted . together to immediately help ukraine, and nato wanted to| together to immediately help - ukraine, and nato wanted to keep some _ ukraine, and nato wanted to keep some distance _ ukraine, and nato wanted to keep some distance from _ ukraine, and nato wanted to keep some distance from the _ ukraine, and nato wanted to keep some distance from the very- some distance from the very beginning _ some distance from the very beginning. nato _ some distance from the very beginning. nato countries i some distance from the very. beginning. nato countries said some distance from the very- beginning. nato countries said there is a distinction — beginning. nato countries said there is a distinction between _ beginning. nato countries said there is a distinction between member- is a distinction between member states, _ is a distinction between member states, which— is a distinction between member states, which nato— is a distinction between member states, which nato is— is a distinction between member states, which nato is committedj is a distinction between member. states, which nato is committed to defending, — states, which nato is committed to defending, indeed _ states, which nato is committed to defending, indeed every— states, which nato is committed to defending, indeed every inch - states, which nato is committed to defending, indeed every inch of- states, which nato is committed to| defending, indeed every inch of that territory. _ defending, indeed every inch of that territory. and — defending, indeed every inch of that territory, and nonmember— defending, indeed every inch of that territory, and nonmember states. defending, indeed every inch of thatl territory, and nonmember states and ukraine _ territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is— territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not— territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not a— territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not a member. _ territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not a member. and - territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not a member. and as- territory, and nonmember states and ukraine is not a member. and as a l ukraine is not a member. and as a result, _ ukraine is not a member. and as a result, the — ukraine is not a member. and as a result, the assistance _ ukraine is not a member. and as a result, the assistance provided - result, the assistance provided including — result, the assistance provided including the _ result, the assistance provided including the training - result, the assistance provided including the training that - result, the assistance provided including the training that hasl result, the assistance providedl including the training that has a provided — including the training that has a provided has— including the training that has a provided has been— including the training that has a provided has been done - including the training that has a provided has been done by- including the training that has a - provided has been done by individual countries, _ provided has been done by individual countries, some _ provided has been done by individual countries, some of— provided has been done by individual countries, some of which _ provided has been done by individual countries, some of which are - provided has been done by individual countries, some of which are now. countries, some of which are now members — countries, some of which are now members but _ countries, some of which are now members but some _ countries, some of which are now members but some of— countries, some of which are now members but some of which- countries, some of which are now members but some of which are i countries, some of which are now. members but some of which are not nato members _ members but some of which are not nato members. but— members but some of which are not nato members. but as _ members but some of which are not nato members. but as it— members but some of which are not nato members. but as it has- members but some of which are notl nato members. but as it has become increasingly— nato members. but as it has become increasingly clear— nato members. but as it has become increasingly clear that _ nato members. but as it has become increasingly clear that this _ increasingly clear that this conflict _ increasingly clear that this conflict will— increasingly clear that this conflict will not _ increasingly clear that this conflict will not end - increasingly clear that this conflict will not end until i increasingly clear that this - conflict will not end until such time — conflict will not end until such time as— conflict will not end until such time as ukraine _ conflict will not end until such time as ukraine is _ conflict will not end until such time as ukraine is a _ conflict will not end until such time as ukraine is a safe - conflict will not end until such time as ukraine is a safe andl time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of— time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of a _ time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of a nato— time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of a nato alliance, _ time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of a nato alliance, nato - time as ukraine is a safe and secure part of a nato alliance, nato is - part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on _ part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on a _ part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on a bigger— part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on a bigger role _ part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on a bigger role to _ part of a nato alliance, nato is to be on a bigger role to start- be on a bigger role to start bringing _ be on a bigger role to start bringing that _ be on a bigger role to start bringing that day _ be on a bigger role to start bringing that day forward. i be on a bigger role to start- bringing that day forward. and demonstrate _ bringing that day forward. and demonstrate to— bringing that day forward. and demonstrate to the _ bringing that day forward. and demonstrate to the ukrainians bringing that day forward. and - demonstrate to the ukrainians that it takes— demonstrate to the ukrainians that it takes ukraine's _ demonstrate to the ukrainians that it takes ukraine's security- it takes ukraine's security seriously— it takes ukraine's security seriously ultimately- it takes ukraine's security seriously ultimately will l it takes ukraine's securityl seriously ultimately will be it takes ukraine's security. seriously ultimately will be a member— seriously ultimately will be a member of— seriously ultimately will be a member of nato. _ seriously ultimately will be a member of nato. [— seriously ultimately will be a member of nato._ seriously ultimately will be a member of nato. ., ., _, ., ., member of nato. i want to come on to what the endgame _ member of nato. i want to come on to what the endgame looks _ member of nato. i want to come on to what the endgame looks like is - member of nato. i want to come on to what the endgame looks like is for - what the endgame looks like is for if neto is concerned and just a second but first of all talk to me about the sniffing is what we heard from hungary today and viktor 0rban saying it will take no part in this effort but at the same time it will not stand in its way. this is a significant hurdle moved out of the way, is it not? significant hurdle moved out of the way. is it not?— way, is it not? yes, it is. this is how nate _ way, is it not? yes, it is. this is how nato operates. _ way, is it not? yes, it is. this is how nato operates. nato - way, is it not? yes, it is. this is i how nato operates. nato operates by consensus _ how nato operates. nato operates by consensus which _ how nato operates. nato operates by consensus which does _ how nato operates. nato operates by consensus which does not _ how nato operates. nato operates by consensus which does not mean - consensus which does not mean that everybody _ consensus which does not mean that everybody has — consensus which does not mean that everybody has to _ consensus which does not mean that everybody has to vote _ consensus which does not mean that everybody has to vote yes _ consensus which does not mean that everybody has to vote yes but - consensus which does not mean that everybody has to vote yes but it - everybody has to vote yes but it 'ust everybody has to vote yes but it just means _ everybody has to vote yes but it just means that _ everybody has to vote yes but it just means that nobody- everybody has to vote yes but it just means that nobody should i everybody has to vote yes but it i just means that nobody should say no. just means that nobody should say n0~ and _ just means that nobody should say n0~ and hungary— just means that nobody should say no. and hungary has _ just means that nobody should say no. and hungary hasjust- just means that nobody should say no. and hungary hasjust indicated that while — no. and hungary hasjust indicated that white it — no. and hungary hasjust indicated that while it disagrees _ that while it disagrees fundamentally- that while it disagrees fundamentally with i that while it disagrees. fundamentally with this that while it disagrees - fundamentally with this policy, that while it disagrees _ fundamentally with this policy, it won't _ fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand — fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand in_ fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand in the _ fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand in the way, - fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand in the way, it - fundamentally with this policy, it won't stand in the way, it won't i fundamentally with this policy, it. won't stand in the way, it won't say no. won't stand in the way, it won't say no and _ won't stand in the way, it won't say no and as— won't stand in the way, it won't say no and as a — won't stand in the way, it won't say no. and as a result, _ won't stand in the way, it won't say no. and as a result, nato _ won't stand in the way, it won't say no. and as a result, nato can- no. and as a result, nato can move forward _ no. and as a result, nato can move forward this — no. and as a result, nato can move forward. this is _ no. and as a result, nato can move forward. this is not _ no. and as a result, nato can move forward. this is not something - no. and as a result, nato can move forward. this is not something that| forward. this is not something that is new _ forward. this is not something that is new this— forward. this is not something that is new this is— forward. this is not something that is new. this is something - forward. this is not something that is new. this is something that- forward. this is not something that is new. this is something that the. is new. this is something that the alliance _ is new. this is something that the attiance has— is new. this is something that the alliance has done _ is new. this is something that the alliance has done for— is new. this is something that the alliance has done for many, - is new. this is something that the alliance has done for many, manyj alliance has done for many, many years _ alliance has done for many, many years recatt— alliance has done for many, many years. recall that— alliance has done for many, many years. recall that greece - alliance has done for many, many years. recall that greece decided| years. recall that greece decided that it _ years. recall that greece decided that it did — years. recall that greece decided that it did not— years. recall that greece decided that it did not want— years. recall that greece decided that it did not want to _ years. recall that greece decided that it did not want to be - years. recall that greece decided that it did not want to be part- that it did not want to be part of the nato — that it did not want to be part of the nato operation _ that it did not want to be part of the nato operation in _ that it did not want to be part ofi the nato operation in kosovo and that germany— the nato operation in kosovo and that germany as _ the nato operation in kosovo and that germany as late _ the nato operation in kosovo and that germany as late as - the nato operation in kosovo and that germany as late as 2011 - the nato operation in kosovo andi that germany as late as 2011 when nato had — that germany as late as 2011 when nato had an— that germany as late as 2011 when nato had an operation _ that germany as late as 2011 when nato had an operation in- that germany as late as 2011 when nato had an operation in libya - nato had an operation in libya decided they— nato had an operation in libya decided they did _ nato had an operation in libya decided they did not _ nato had an operation in libya decided they did not want - nato had an operation in libya decided they did not want part nato had an operation in libya . decided they did not want part of it but they— decided they did not want part of it but they would _ decided they did not want part of it but they would not _ decided they did not want part of it but they would not stand _ decided they did not want part of it but they would not stand in - decided they did not want part of it but they would not stand in the - decided they did not want part of it| but they would not stand in the way of nato _ but they would not stand in the way of nato doing — but they would not stand in the way of nato doing this. _ but they would not stand in the way of nato doing this. and _ but they would not stand in the way of nato doing this. and so - but they would not stand in the way of nato doing this. and so in this. of nato doing this. and so in this sense, _ of nato doing this. and so in this sense, it — of nato doing this. and so in this sense, it is — of nato doing this. and so in this sense, it isa— of nato doing this. and so in this sense, it is a very— of nato doing this. and so in this sense, it is a very positive move| sense, it is a very positive move from _ sense, it is a very positive move from a _ sense, it is a very positive move from a country— sense, it is a very positive move from a country that _ sense, it is a very positive move from a country that mostly - sense, it is a very positive move| from a country that mostly takes negative — from a country that mostly takes negative stances _ from a country that mostly takes negative stances and _ from a country that mostly takes negative stances and uses - from a country that mostly takes negative stances and uses its - from a country that mostly takes i negative stances and uses its veto wittingty~ — negative stances and uses its veto wittingty~ it's— negative stances and uses its veto wittingty~ it's not _ negative stances and uses its veto willingly. it's not be _ negative stances and uses its veto willingly. it's not be telling - negative stances and uses its veto willingly. it's not be telling it. - willingly. it's not be telling it. it's willingly. it's not be telling it. it's saying _ willingly. it's not be telling it. it's saying you _ willingly. it's not be telling it. it's saying you go _ willingly. it's not be telling it. it's saying you go ahead, - willingly. it's not be telling it. it's saying you go ahead, we i willingly. it's not be telling it. . it's saying you go ahead, we are 'ust it's saying you go ahead, we are just not— it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going _ it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going to— it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going to be _ it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going to be part - it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going to be part of- it's saying you go ahead, we are just not going to be part of it. i just not going to be part of it. something _ just not going to be part of it. something else _ just not going to be part of it. something else is _ just not going to be part of it. something else is not - just not going to be part of it. something else is not new- just not going to be part of it. something else is not new of| just not going to be part of it. - something else is not new of course in all of this is that nato cannot afford to let ukraine fail here. and we heard those reiterated comments from president biden at the d—day commemorations saying that as an acknowledgement that if ukraine falls, all of nato is at risk. and with that in mind, therefore what does an in game look like. he said it's about ukraine being admitted to nato and security for ukraine but had a we measure that? had to we know tangibly on the ground that ukraine is safe?— know tangibly on the ground that ukraine is safe? well, this is a war not 'ust ukraine is safe? well, this is a war not just about _ ukraine is safe? well, this is a war notjust about territory, _ ukraine is safe? well, this is a war not just about territory, it's - ukraine is safe? well, this is a war notjust about territory, it's a - ukraine is safe? well, this is a war notjust about territory, it's a war i not just about territory, it's a war about— not just about territory, it's a war about who — not just about territory, it's a war about who controls _ not just about territory, it's a war about who controls ukraine's - about who controls ukraine's destiny~ _ about who controls ukraine's destiny. what— about who controls ukraine's destiny. what vladimir- about who controls ukraine's destiny. what vladimir putinj about who controls ukraine's - destiny. what vladimir putin wants is not _ destiny. what vladimir putin wants is notjust— destiny. what vladimir putin wants is notjust the _ destiny. what vladimir putin wants is not just the incorporation - destiny. what vladimir putin wants is notjust the incorporation of- is notjust the incorporation of parts — is notjust the incorporation of parts of— is notjust the incorporation of parts of ukraine _ is notjust the incorporation of parts of ukraine as _ is notjust the incorporation of parts of ukraine as part- is notjust the incorporation of parts of ukraine as part of- is notjust the incorporation of. parts of ukraine as part of russia but what — parts of ukraine as part of russia but what he — parts of ukraine as part of russia but what he really _ parts of ukraine as part of russia but what he really wants - parts of ukraine as part of russia but what he really wants us - parts of ukraine as part of russia but what he really wants us to i parts of ukraine as part of russia i but what he really wants us to make sure that _ but what he really wants us to make sure that kyiv— but what he really wants us to make sure that kyiv cannot _ but what he really wants us to make sure that kyiv cannot make - but what he really wants us to make| sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are _ sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are not — sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are not determined _ sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are not determined or— sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are not determined or in - sure that kyiv cannot make decisions that are not determined or in fact - that are not determined or in fact dictated — that are not determined or in fact dictated tty— that are not determined or in fact dictated by moscow. _ that are not determined or in fact dictated by moscow. that's - that are not determined or in fact dictated by moscow. that's whati that are not determined or in fact. dictated by moscow. that's what this war is— dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, — dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, and _ dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, and in _ dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, and in that— dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, and in that sense - dictated by moscow. that's what this war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is— war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed — war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed and _ war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed and able _ war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed and able to _ war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed and able to make - war is about, and in that sense when kyiv is allowed and able to make his| kyiv is allowed and able to make his own decisions, — kyiv is allowed and able to make his own decisions, including _ kyiv is allowed and able to make his own decisions, including joining - kyiv is allowed and able to make his own decisions, including joining the| own decisions, including joining the european _ own decisions, including joining the european union _ own decisions, including joining the european union and _ own decisions, including joining the european union and joining - own decisions, including joining the european union and joining nato, l european union and joining nato, then it _ european union and joining nato, then it witt— european union and joining nato, then it will have _ european union and joining nato, then it will have defeated - european union and joining nato, then it will have defeated in- european union and joining nato, then it will have defeated in a - european union and joining nato,| then it will have defeated in a very real sense — then it will have defeated in a very real sense russia's— then it will have defeated in a very real sense russia's strategic- then it will have defeated in a veryl real sense russia's strategic name. does _ real sense russia's strategic name. does that— real sense russia's strategic name. does that mean _ real sense russia's strategic name. does that mean that _ real sense russia's strategic name. does that mean that every - real sense russia's strategic name. does that mean that every inch - real sense russia's strategic name. does that mean that every inch of. does that mean that every inch of ukrainian — does that mean that every inch of ukrainian territory— does that mean that every inch of ukrainian territory that _ does that mean that every inch of ukrainian territory that is - does that mean that every inch of ukrainian territory that is today i ukrainian territory that is today occupied — ukrainian territory that is today occupied try— ukrainian territory that is today occupied by russia _ ukrainian territory that is today occupied by russia has- ukrainian territory that is today occupied by russia has to - ukrainian territory that is today occupied by russia has to be i occupied by russia has to be immediately— occupied by russia has to be immediately returned - occupied by russia has to be immediately returned in - occupied by russia has to be. immediately returned in order occupied by russia has to be - immediately returned in order for this fighting — immediately returned in order for this fighting to _ immediately returned in order for this fighting to stop _ immediately returned in order for this fighting to stop or— immediately returned in order for this fighting to stop or even - immediately returned in order for this fighting to stop or even the l this fighting to stop or even the war to — this fighting to stop or even the war to end? _ this fighting to stop or even the warto end? 0r— this fighting to stop or even the war to end? or even _ this fighting to stop or even the war to end? or even for- this fighting to stop or even the| war to end? or even for ukraine this fighting to stop or even the - war to end? or even for ukraine be part of— war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? — war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? my— war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? my answer— war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? my answer is- war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? my answer is no. - war to end? or even for ukraine be part of nato? my answer is no. it l part of nato? my answer is no. it does _ part of nato? my answer is no. it does not — part of nato? my answer is no. it does not mean _ part of nato? my answer is no. it does not mean that _ part of nato? my answer is no. it does not mean that we _ part of nato? my answer is no. it does not mean that we cannot i part of nato? my answer is no. it. does not mean that we cannot move forward _ does not mean that we cannot move forward with — does not mean that we cannot move forward with nato. _ does not mean that we cannot move forward with nato. germany - does not mean that we cannot movej forward with nato. germany became does not mean that we cannot move l forward with nato. germany became a member— forward with nato. germany became a member of— forward with nato. germany became a member of nato— forward with nato. germany became a member of nato in— forward with nato. germany became a member of nato in 1955— forward with nato. germany became a member of nato in 1955 without - forward with nato. germany became a member of nato in 1955 without the i member of nato in 1955 without the question— member of nato in 1955 without the question of— member of nato in 1955 without the question of what _ member of nato in 1955 without the question of what happened - member of nato in 1955 without the question of what happened to - member of nato in 1955 without the question of what happened to easti question of what happened to east germany— question of what happened to east germany having _ question of what happened to east germany having been _ question of what happened to east germany having been settled. - question of what happened to east germany having been settled. sol germany having been settled. so there _ germany having been settled. so there is— germany having been settled. so there is precedent— germany having been settled. so there is precedent for— germany having been settled. so there is precedent for this. - germany having been settled. so there is precedent for this. whatl there is precedent for this. what needs— there is precedent for this. what needs to — there is precedent for this. what needs to end _ there is precedent for this. what needs to end if— there is precedent for this. what needs to end if the _ there is precedent for this. what needs to end if the fighting, - there is precedent for this. what needs to end if the fighting, and j needs to end if the fighting, and the way— needs to end if the fighting, and the way to— needs to end if the fighting, and the way to end _ needs to end if the fighting, and the way to end that _ needs to end if the fighting, and the way to end that is _ needs to end if the fighting, and the way to end that is for- needs to end if the fighting, and l the way to end that is for ukraine to demonstrate _ the way to end that is for ukraine to demonstrate that _ the way to end that is for ukraine to demonstrate that it's - the way to end that is for ukraine to demonstrate that it's able to l to demonstrate that it's able to defend — to demonstrate that it's able to defend itself— to demonstrate that it's able to defend itself and _ to demonstrate that it's able to defend itself and that's - to demonstrate that it's able to defend itself and that's what i to demonstrate that it's able to. defend itself and that's what this nato package _ defend itself and that's what this nato package that _ defend itself and that's what this nato package that secretary - defend itself and that's what this i nato package that secretary viktor 0rban _ nato package that secretary viktor 0rban tatked — nato package that secretary viktor 0rban talked about _ nato package that secretary viktor 0rban talked about that _ nato package that secretary viktor 0rban talked about that will- nato package that secretary viktor 0rban talked about that will be - 0rban talked about that will be approved — 0rban talked about that will be approved tomorrow— 0rban talked about that will be approved tomorrow by - 0rban talked about that will be approved tomorrow by defence ministers— approved tomorrow by defence ministers and— approved tomorrow by defence ministers and in _ approved tomorrow by defence ministers and in washington i approved tomorrow by defence . ministers and in washington next month— ministers and in washington next month is— ministers and in washington next month is going _ ministers and in washington next month is going to— ministers and in washington next month is going to help _ ministers and in washington next month is going to help bring - ministers and in washington next . month is going to help bring about. great _ month is going to help bring about. great to— month is going to help bring about. great to do— month is going to help bring about. great to do your _ month is going to help bring about. great to do your perspective - month is going to help bring about. great to do your perspective on - great to do your perspective on this, former us ambassador to nato, thank you. gratefulfor this, former us ambassador to nato, thank you. grateful for your this, former us ambassador to nato, thank you. gratefulforyourtime, thank you. grateful for your time, thank yon-— prices are still rising in the united states, but the rate of increases continues to slow. prices rose 3.3% in the year to the end of may, down 0.1% on the month before, not enough to push america's central bank into a move on interest rates. it held the cost of borrowing steady on wednesday and pushed out the start of rate cuts to perhaps as late as december. live to new york and our north america business correspondent erin delmore. once again it's a sort of familiar tale that inflation heading in the right direction but not enough, not significant enough of a move to say the interest rate to be coming down anytime soon. the interest rate to be coming down anytime soon-— the interest rate to be coming down anytime soon. that's right, ben. the fed has chosen _ anytime soon. that's right, ben. the fed has chosen to _ anytime soon. that's right, ben. the fed has chosen to hold _ anytime soon. that's right, ben. the fed has chosen to hold steady - anytime soon. that's right, ben. the fed has chosen to hold steady given | fed has chosen to hold steady given the benchmark interest rate at 5.25 or 5.5% and that's been a two decade high. not quite the news americans were looking for but it was very widely in line with expectations. broadly the fed was admitted to keep rates unchanged today. as a prize on the upside is in that cbi read out we get this morning, that the consumer price index, that yearly price increase coming in at 3.3%, a fuller rate of increase in expected and slower than what we saw in april. in fact if you match up month—to—month, we actually see no increase at all between april and may and so that's encouraging news for american consumers and also encouraging news broadly for the fed as one of many data points taken together but as he will hear from jerome powell not enough to move the needle. we do see today's report as progress and as— we do see today's report as progress and as building confidence that we don't _ and as building confidence that we don't see — and as building confidence that we don't see ourselves as having the confidence — don't see ourselves as having the confidence that would warrant, that would _ confidence that would warrant, that would warrant beginning to loosen poticy _ would warrant beginning to loosen policy at _ would warrant beginning to loosen policy at this time. so this march at seven straight fed meetings without cutting interest rates and there are only four meetings left this year from what we do after meetings like this is we look at the dot plot, a summary of economic projections come in to see what federal reserve members into the bait for the year ahead. if you look at the median projection they are, it's one rate cut before the year is out and so there is that meeting in september which of course would put a rate cut on the table before the november election of members meet later on in november and december. members meet later on in november and december-— members meet later on in november and december. looking at some of the other comments _ and december. looking at some of the other comments there _ and december. looking at some of the other comments there from _ and december. looking at some of the other comments there from the - and december. looking at some of the other comments there from the chair l other comments there from the chair of the fed and noticed we pay a lot of the fed and noticed we pay a lot of attention to this because it's about firing the starting gun for that cut that will be consecutive we expect towards the end of the year, but powell saying you cannot read a lot into a single quarter percentage point, as it would not having enough impact on the us economy. he says this about the policy that's more important and that is notjust talking about the dot plot and that trend, that's what everyone wants to is that will rates be not at the end of the year but 18 months from now, two years from now what will the economy look like and that is more issue? �* �* , economy look like and that is more issue? . �*, . , issue? and it's also he has been talkin: issue? and it's also he has been talking very _ issue? and it's also he has been talking very much _ issue? and it's also he has been talking very much the _ issue? and it's also he has been talking very much the same - issue? and it's also he has been| talking very much the same tune issue? and it's also he has been - talking very much the same tune over the last couple of months and said very clearly during his press conference today that they don't want to begin cutting rates too soon or too aggressively. they are very focused on the dual mandate, insuring not only price stability but also full employment and he talked about how any potential softening in the job talked about how any potential softening in thejob market talked about how any potential softening in the job market would talked about how any potential softening in thejob market would be the kind of thing that would spur of the kind of thing that would spur of the fed to cut rates sooner but in the meantime they are saying essentially slow and steady wins the race. , ., ., ., essentially slow and steady wins the race. ,., ., ., ., " essentially slow and steady wins the race. ., . ~ ., . ~ race. good to talk to you, thank you enou:h to race. good to talk to you, thank you enough to see _ race. good to talk to you, thank you enough to see you _ race. good to talk to you, thank you enough to see you live _ race. good to talk to you, thank you enough to see you live there from . enough to see you live there from new york with the latest there on inflation figures and what it tells us about the path of interest rates in the united states. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news. now, how long do you think you could last without your smartphone? a few hours? a day? maybe two at a push? well, we've followed a group of teenagers to see how they cope without their smartphones for five whole days. a new online survey of 2000 young people suggests three quarters of teenagers wouldn't swap their smartphone for a low—tech device thatjust makes calls and sends texts, so we asked ten students to do at one college. our reporter kristianjohnson was there to follow how they got on. ok guys, point of no return. this group of students are doing the unthinkable — locking their smartphones away. you said your goodbye? no tiktok, no snapchat, no whatsapp. so, guys, these are your new... oh, my god! they're so huge! instead, they'll be using these. the only way of communicating — text and calls. i want a nokia. this is weird, i don't like it. so, in the mornings, usually i like search up the tram times, then i know, oh yeah, i need to leave in five minutes, oh yeah, i've got a little bit of time before i need to leave, but with, like, without a phone, i've got no way of knowing when the next tram will be. ok, so i'm 52 hours into the detox, i'm finding it ok _ i don't think it is - difficult or anything. but charlie's already given into temptation. it's genuinely hard when you don't have it. it's like having a comfort item for how many ever years, and itjust goes. it's really stressful. some others are struggling, too. not knowing what's going on in a like a groupchat, itjust makes me, what am i missing out on? but most are focusing on the positives. lot of me is like learning stuff and engaging more and noticing stuff around me, which i probably should be noticing any ways, but i'm just too addicted to my phone. i usuallyjust watch, like, disney plus for, like, an hour, and then just drift off, but since then i've just gone straight to sleep and it's weird. it feels much better. the more time goes on, - it becomes a lot easier to think of things to do cos you don't have your phone, so like, i oh, new message. five days on, time to get those smartphones back. is that yours? in general, going on tiktok and everything, i'm so going to do that. if anything, i'm going to do it more now. i'll try and use less - of tiktok, that's for sure. i know my screen time is quite high on that. i perhaps the students aren't quite ready to give up their smartphones entirely, but the detox might start to slowly changes their habits. kristian johnson, bbc news. i could not cope without. cricket might be the most english of pastimes. it's not something you'd associate with bigger, brasher america. but the us is hosting the t20 world cup. and today, the hosts took on one of the sport's giants, but couldn't quite get past them. india defeated the us by seven wickets, securing their place in the second round of the tournament with one more game to play. all hope is not lost for the us either. they'll have a chance to qualify in a final group match against ireland. joining me now is the daily telegraph's cricket writer tim wigmore. i know you were glued to the screen. what did you make of the match? for the us, what did you make of the match? fr?" the us, it's the first time in the world cup and they've already beaten pakistan and playing the tournament favourites, they did pretty well. they were in the game for a large chunk of india's chase, so i for the usa another brilliant performance in a positive sign for where is going in the us. ., . ., . a positive sign for where is going inthe us. ., . ., . , , , in the us. how much of a surprise was it that — in the us. how much of a surprise was it that it _ in the us. how much of a surprise was it that it was _ in the us. how much of a surprise was it that it was not _ in the us. how much of a surprise was it that it was not a _ was it that it was not a total walkover?— was it that it was not a total walkover? ,, .. . , . . walkover? the us actually had a series with _ walkover? the us actually had a series with bangladesh - walkover? the us actually had a series with bangladesh last - walkover? the us actually had a l series with bangladesh last month and they won their first ever series victory over a tessellation team. there was the launch of major league cricket, a kind of big league in t20 ticket last year, so the us has put a lot of investment there and you will see a combination both of home—grown players and also because in cricket if you live somewhere for three years you can qualify through that country as a resident basically, and there has been some high—profile players will donate in america. corey anderson played in the world cup final for new zealand in 2050 and now he plays for america. those two factors are kind of helping the american team and they have got a good coach in the former australian player and test match cricket player and other performers as well so there have been some positive developments certainly at the top end of american cricket. how significant is it that this t20 tournament is being co—hosted in the us? not only is a cricket but it's t20 because it opens up that sport to a whole new range of fans. yes. because it opens up that sport to a whole new range of fans. yes, from 2015 to last — whole new range of fans. yes, from 2015 to last year, _ whole new range of fans. yes, from 2015 to last year, every _ whole new range of fans. yes, from 2015 to last year, every single - 2015 to last year, every single major men possibly event was held in either australia, england or india so the sport really focused on its core markets rather than expanding in this is been co—hosted between america and the west indies, all over there. so what we are seeing is being taken to a new market and t20 which as you said is the game could take off in america with good signs with mentally cricket. also cricket returned to the lipid games in 2028 in los angeles and that will be another kind of big t20 international event in the us. there is some real optimism in the us that people always had this dream of american cricket in effect us cricket was number one until the civil war in the 19th century swiss taken a long time but maybe we have come full circle where cricket is having its way in this moment again in the us. ., . ., . ., , in the us. how much of that, house and if ou in the us. how much of that, house and if you get _ in the us. how much of that, house and if you get a game _ in the us. how much of that, house and if you get a game changer- in the us. how much of that, house j and if you get a game changer is it? we look to the us and it's got big audiences, expensive advertisers. the money will make a significant difference to the game if it takes off in the way that is expected. fine off in the way that is expected. one off in the way that is expected. one ofthe off in the way that is expected. one of the bi off in the way that is expected. ore: of the big issues for off in the way that is expected. (zjj9: of the big issues for cricket off in the way that is expected. (zjj9 of the big issues for cricket at the moment in the region of three quarters of its broadcast revenue comes from the indian market. that's a real concern for administrators a part of the reason for this event being in the us and the general push in the us is cricket trying to diversify its economy so as not to rely on one market because in recent years as the indian middle class has grown, that's been the way cricket has got richer but now it's trying to diversify the market and clearly the us, talking about cricket replacing baseball, that is not going to happen but cricket does not need to do that for the us to be a certificate market and for them to have a very good team with them beating to test nations already. there's no reason in a few years cricket cannot be, a us team cannot be in the top ten in the 20 cricket and that cannot be may be playing tennis cricket and significant source of revenue for the game. {30 source of revenue for the game. go to talk to you, thank you, keep watching. thank you. the acropolis in athens is to close during the hottest hours of the day as greece experiences a heatwave. temperatures are expected to reach 43 celsius over the next couple of days. officals say the archaeological site will close from midday to 5pm during the first heatwave of the year in greece. schools will remain closed in several regions on wednesday and thursday, while the work ministry has advised public sector employees to work from home. back with the panel for un just a second. stay with us here on bbc news. hello. it's been another day of below average temperatures across most parts of the uk. with that, we've seen a fair amount of cloud, but also a fair amount of dry weather. this cool air mass, though, is set to be replaced by something that — on the face of it — looks a little bit warmer, a change in wind direction. but with that, we see this frontal system pushing in from the west. that will bring some heavy rain and some quite brisk winds. and i think by virtue of the cloud, the rain, the strong winds, it will still feel rather cool for many of us. but, actually, through tonight, it is going to be decidedly chilly where we keep these clear skies overhead. we'll see a few mist and fog patches here and there, cloud and rain then spreading into parts of northern ireland, perhaps the far west of wales, the west of cornwall, by the end of the night here, turning a little bit milder. but where we keep those clear skies, decidedly chilly to start thursday morning. some parts of scotland out in the countryside starting their day around 2—3 celsius, but with some sunshine. however, this band of cloud and rain will be spreading in across western areas, becoming quite slow moving, actually. so the rain heavy and persistent across the southwest of england and wales, 20—30 millimetres of rain possible. and around some western coasts, gusts of wind of 50 miles per hour or more. quite unusual for this time of year. that rain spreading across the isle of man into north west england, affecting northern ireland, southwestern and central parts of scotland. eastern england holding onto some mostly dry conditions. northern scotland holding on to a little bit of sunshine. temperatures here actually a little bit higher than they have been. we could see highs of 17 degrees now through thursday night into friday, that band of rain will continue to drive its way and northwards lingering, i think across northern parts of scotland for the first part of friday morning and then to the south of that, well, it is a mix of sunny spells and showers. the showers quite plentiful, actually. there'll be lots of them. some will be heavy, some will be thundery. temperatures a little bit higher than they have been, 13—19 degrees, but that's still a touch below the seasonal average. what about the weekend? well, low pressure will remain in charge of the scene. so that is going to bring showers or longer spells of rain. the showers on saturday will be quite widespread. some of them will be on the heavy side. by sunday, the showers perhaps focusing across the north of the uk, something a little bit drierfurther south, not quite as cool as it has been. hello, i'm ben thompson. you're watching the context on bbc news. we will not raise tax on working people. that means no tax rises for income tax, national insurance, for vat. our manifesto comes out tomorrow. it is a very forward looking manifesto. but there is nothing in our manifesto that requires us to raise tax. tax cuts for people at every stage of their life. for people in work, for people who are setting up small businesses and self—employed, for those young people want to buy their first home, for pensioners and for families, because i believe people should keep more of their hard earned money now that we're a position to do so having restored economic stability. on the panel tonight, journalist and author jenny kleeman, john manley — politics correspondent for the irish news, and chris morris — ceo of full fact.